CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Interdisciplinary Spinal Research ISR, Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, CH, Switzerland.
CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Oct;37:75-79. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
Cervical spine (CS) range of motion (ROM) is commonly used to assess neck pain. However, this measurement is often limited by the clinician's experience and perception. Therefore, the integration of perceptual feedback of the patient can optimize and personalize treatment.
Develop and validate a questionnaire (S-ROM-Neck) to evaluate ROM of the CS from the patient's perspective.
Validation study.
The assessment tool was developed and optimized during pretest sessions. Reliability and construct validity of the questionnaire were tested. 50 participants (age >18 years) with neck pain for >90 days, able to fluently speak, read, and write in German were included. Exclusion criteria included any condition that limited manual therapy to the CS. Participants completed S-ROM-Neck twice within seven days, along with the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain intensity and the German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-G). The relative reliability, internal consistency, and absolute reliability were analyzed, and Bland-Altman plots were generated. Construct validity was established by correlating the total score of S-ROM-Neck with VAS and NDI-G based on pre-set hypotheses.
S-ROM-Neck demonstrated moderate reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.718 (Cronbach's alpha of 0.83). There was a medium negative correlation between VAS and S-ROM-Neck [Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r) = -0.30, p = 0.031] and the NDI-G and S-ROM-Neck (r = -0.40, p = 0.002).
These results indicate the reliability and internal consistency of S-ROM-Neck. This scale provides patient feedback and perspectives to optimize assessment of neck pain.
颈椎(CS)活动范围(ROM)常用于评估颈部疼痛。然而,这种测量通常受到临床医生经验和感知的限制。因此,整合患者的感知反馈可以优化和个性化治疗。
开发和验证一种从患者角度评估 CS ROM 的问卷(S-ROM-Neck)。
验证研究。
在预测试期间开发和优化评估工具。测试问卷的可靠性和结构有效性。纳入 50 名(年龄> 18 岁)患有颈痛> 90 天、能流利地说、读、写德语的参与者。排除标准包括任何限制 CS 手法治疗的条件。参与者在七天内两次完成 S-ROM-Neck 以及视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛强度和德国版颈痛残疾指数(NDI-G)。分析相对可靠性、内部一致性和绝对可靠性,并生成 Bland-Altman 图。根据预设假设,通过将 S-ROM-Neck 的总分与 VAS 和 NDI-G 进行相关性分析,建立结构有效性。
S-ROM-Neck 具有中等可靠性,组内相关系数为 0.718(Cronbach's alpha 为 0.83)。VAS 与 S-ROM-Neck 之间存在中度负相关[Spearman 秩相关系数(r)= -0.30,p = 0.031],NDI-G 与 S-ROM-Neck 之间也存在中度负相关(r = -0.40,p = 0.002)。
这些结果表明 S-ROM-Neck 的可靠性和内部一致性。该量表提供了患者的反馈和观点,以优化颈部疼痛的评估。