Suppr超能文献

牙科树脂基材料的耐磨性比较及表面分析

Comparative abrasive wear resistance and surface analysis of dental resin-based materials.

作者信息

Nayyer Maleeha, Zahid Shahreen, Hassan Syed Hammad, Mian Salman Aziz, Mehmood Sana, Khan Haroon Ahmed, Kaleem Muhammad, Zafar Muhammad Sohail, Khan Abdul Samad

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials, Army Medical College, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Department of Prosthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Eur J Dent. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):57-66. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_380_17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the surface properties (microhardness and wear resistance) of various composites and compomer materials. In addition, the methodologies used for assessing wear resistance were compared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted using restorative material (Filtek Z250, Filtek Z350, QuiXfil, SureFil SDR, and Dyract XP) to assess wear resistance. A custom-made toothbrush simulator was employed for wear testing. Before and after wear resistance, structural, surface, and physical properties were assessed using various techniques.

RESULTS

Structural changes and mass loss were observed after treatment, whereas no significant difference in terms of microhardness was observed. The correlation between atomic force microscopy (AFM) and profilometer and between wear resistance and filler volume was highly significant. The correlation between wear resistance and microhardness were insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

The AFM presented higher precision compared to optical profilometers at a nanoscale level, but both methods can be used in tandem for a more detailed and precise roughness analysis.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估各种复合材料和复合体材料的表面性能(显微硬度和耐磨性)。此外,还比较了用于评估耐磨性的方法。

材料与方法

本研究使用修复材料(Filtek Z250、Filtek Z350、QuiXfil、SureFil SDR和Dyract XP)来评估耐磨性。使用定制的牙刷模拟器进行磨损测试。在耐磨性测试前后,使用各种技术评估结构、表面和物理性能。

结果

处理后观察到结构变化和质量损失,而在显微硬度方面未观察到显著差异。原子力显微镜(AFM)与轮廓仪之间以及耐磨性与填料体积之间的相关性非常显著。耐磨性与显微硬度之间的相关性不显著。

结论

在纳米尺度上,AFM比光学轮廓仪具有更高的精度,但两种方法可以串联使用,以进行更详细和精确的粗糙度分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0583/5883477/b2c11ef80244/EJD-12-57-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验