• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用数字语言处理器量化听力损失成人的听觉环境及助听器的效果。

Using a Digital Language Processor to Quantify the Auditory Environment and the Effect of Hearing Aids for Adults with Hearing Loss.

作者信息

Klein Kelsey E, Wu Yu-Hsiang, Stangl Elizabeth, Bentler Ruth A

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Apr;29(4):279-291. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16114.

DOI:10.3766/jaaa.16114
PMID:29664722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6003626/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Auditory environments can influence the communication function of individuals with hearing loss and the effects of hearing aids. Therefore, a tool that can objectively characterize a patient's real-world auditory environments is needed.

PURPOSE

To use the Language Environment Analysis (LENA) system to quantify the auditory environments of adults with hearing loss, to examine if the use of hearing aids changes a user's auditory environment, and to determine the association between LENA variables and self-report hearing aid outcome measures.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This study used a crossover design.

STUDY SAMPLE

Participants included 22 adults with mild-to-moderate hearing loss, age 64-82 yr.

INTERVENTION

Participants were fitted with bilateral behind-the-ear hearing aids from a major manufacturer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The LENA system consists of a digital language processor (DLP) that is worn by an individual and records up to 16 hr of the individual's auditory environment. The recording is then automatically categorized according to time spent in different types of auditory environments (e.g., meaningful speech and TV/electronic sound) by the LENA algorithms. The LENA system also characterizes the user's auditory environment by providing the sound levels of different auditory categories. Participants in the present study wore a LENA DLP in an unaided condition and aided condition, which each lasted six to eight days. Participants wore bilateral hearing aids in the aided condition. Percentage of time spent in each auditory environment, as well as median levels of TV/electronic sounds and speech, were compared between subjects' unaided and aided conditions using paired sample t tests. LENA data were also compared to self-report measures of hearing disability and hearing aid benefit using Pearson correlations.

RESULTS

Overall, participants spent the greatest percentage of time in silence (∼40%), relative to other auditory environments. Participants spent ∼12% and 26% of their time in meaningful speech and TV/electronic sound environments, respectively. No significant differences were found between mean percentage of time spent in each auditory environment in the unaided and aided conditions. Median TV/electronic sound levels were on average 2.4 dB lower in the aided condition than in the unaided condition; speech levels were not significantly different between the two conditions. TV/electronic sound and speech levels did not significantly correlate with self-report data.

CONCLUSIONS

The LENA system can provide rich data to characterize the everyday auditory environments of older adults with hearing loss. Although TV/electronic sound level was significantly lower in the aided than unaided condition, the use of hearing aids seemed not to substantially change users' auditory environments. Because there is no significant association between objective LENA variables and self-report questionnaire outcomes, these two types of measures may assess different aspects of communication function. The feasibility of using LENA in clinical settings is discussed.

摘要

背景

听觉环境会影响听力损失患者的交流功能以及助听器的效果。因此,需要一种能够客观描述患者现实世界听觉环境的工具。

目的

使用语言环境分析(LENA)系统量化成年听力损失患者的听觉环境,研究使用助听器是否会改变用户的听觉环境,并确定LENA变量与自我报告的助听器效果测量指标之间的关联。

研究设计

本研究采用交叉设计。

研究样本

参与者包括22名年龄在64 - 82岁之间的轻至中度听力损失成年人。

干预措施

为参与者佩戴一家主要制造商生产的双侧耳背式助听器。

数据收集与分析

LENA系统由一个数字语言处理器(DLP)组成,个体佩戴该处理器可记录长达16小时的个人听觉环境。然后,LENA算法会根据在不同类型听觉环境(如,有意义的言语和电视/电子声音)中所花费的时间对录音进行自动分类。LENA系统还通过提供不同听觉类别的声级来描述用户的听觉环境。本研究中的参与者在未佩戴助听器和佩戴助听器的情况下各佩戴一个LENA DLP,每种情况持续六至八天。在佩戴助听器的情况下,参与者佩戴双侧助听器。使用配对样本t检验比较受试者在未佩戴助听器和佩戴助听器情况下在每个听觉环境中所花费时间的百分比,以及电视/电子声音和言语的中位水平。还使用Pearson相关性将LENA数据与听力残疾和助听器益处的自我报告测量指标进行比较。

结果

总体而言,相对于其他听觉环境,参与者在安静环境中所花费的时间百分比最高(约40%)。参与者分别在有意义的言语和电视/电子声音环境中花费约12%和26%的时间。在未佩戴助听器和佩戴助听器的情况下,每个听觉环境中所花费时间的平均百分比没有显著差异。佩戴助听器情况下电视/电子声音的中位水平平均比未佩戴助听器时低2.4 dB;两种情况下言语水平没有显著差异。电视/电子声音和言语水平与自我报告数据没有显著相关性。

结论

LENA系统可以提供丰富的数据来描述老年听力损失患者的日常听觉环境。尽管佩戴助听器时电视/电子声音水平显著低于未佩戴时,但使用助听器似乎并没有实质性改变用户的听觉环境。由于客观的LENA变量与自我报告问卷结果之间没有显著关联,这两种测量方法可能评估了交流功能的不同方面。本文讨论了在临床环境中使用LENA的可行性。

相似文献

1
Using a Digital Language Processor to Quantify the Auditory Environment and the Effect of Hearing Aids for Adults with Hearing Loss.使用数字语言处理器量化听力损失成人的听觉环境及助听器的效果。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Apr;29(4):279-291. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16114.
2
Acclimatization to hearing aids.助听器适应。
Ear Hear. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(2):203-12. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182a8eda4.
3
Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.感音神经性听力损失患者在使用线性和压缩式助听器的未助听和助听条件下的语音识别性能。
Ear Hear. 2002 Aug;23(4):280-90. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200208000-00003.
4
Cognitive Abilities Contribute to Spectro-Temporal Discrimination in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.认知能力有助于听力障碍儿童的声谱-时谱辨别。
Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun;40(3):645-650. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000645.
5
Outcomes of Hearing Aid Use by Individuals with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL).单侧感音神经性听力损失(USNHL)患者使用助听器的效果。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Nov/Dec;28(10):941-949. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17049.
6
Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.助听器在不同输入水平下对言语可懂度的益处。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Mar;26(3):275-88. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.3.7.
7
Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.成人对滤波言语刺激的皮质听觉诱发电位(CAEPs)。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Oct;24(9):807-22. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.9.5.
8
Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.感音神经性听力损失及个人使用助听器对皮质事件相关电位和言语声音处理行为指标的影响。
Ear Hear. 2005 Apr;26(2):165-85. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200504000-00005.
9
Parent report of the development of auditory skills in infants and toddlers who use hearing aids.使用助听器的婴幼儿听觉技能发展的家长报告。
Ear Hear. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):e262-71. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000059.
10
Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.双侧助听器的空间获益。
Ear Hear. 2009 Apr;30(2):203-18. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819769c1.

引用本文的文献

1
Daily-Life Fatigue Among Adolescents Who Are Hard of Hearing: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.听力障碍青少年的日常生活疲劳:一项生态瞬时评估研究。
Ear Hear. 2025 Jul 30. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001705.
2
Examining sound levels across different time scales measured from body-worn dosimetersa).检查通过佩戴在身体上的剂量计测量的不同时间尺度下的声级a)。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2025 Feb 1;157(2):1483-1499. doi: 10.1121/10.0035807.
3
Investigating the Provision and Context of Use of Hearing Aid Listening Programs From Real-world Data: Observational Study.从真实世界数据中调查助听器聆听方案的提供情况和使用背景:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 17;24(10):e36671. doi: 10.2196/36671.
4
Effects of Wireless Remote Microphone on Speech Recognition in Noise for Hearing Aid Users in China.无线远程麦克风对中国助听器使用者在噪声环境中语音识别的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Apr 12;15:643205. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.643205. eCollection 2021.
5
Test-Retest Reliability of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.在听力学研究中,生态瞬时评估的重测信度。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Sep;31(8):599-612. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1717066. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
6
GPS predicts stability of listening environment characteristics in one location over time among older hearing aid users.GPS 预测了老年助听器使用者在一个位置上随时间推移的听力环境特征的稳定性。
Int J Audiol. 2021 May;60(5):328-340. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1831083. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
7
The Effect of Hearing Loss on Localization of Amplitude-Panned and Physical Sources.听力损失对幅度平移和物理声源定位的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Oct;31(9):690-698. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1717122. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
8
Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.老年人轻度至中度听力损失的高级助听器指向性和降噪技术的疗效和有效性。
Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):805-822. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000672.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of the Type of Toy Used During Play With the Quantity and Quality of Parent-Infant Communication.玩耍时使用的玩具类型与亲子沟通的数量和质量有关。
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Feb;170(2):132-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3753.
2
Hearing-aid use and long-term health outcomes: Hearing handicap, mental health, social engagement, cognitive function, physical health, and mortality.助听器使用与长期健康结果:听力障碍、心理健康、社会参与、认知功能、身体健康及死亡率。
Int J Audiol. 2015;54(11):838-44. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1059503. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
3
Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios.现实声音场景中信噪比的估计
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Feb;26(2):183-96. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.2.7.
4
Feasibility study to quantify the auditory and social environment of older adults using a digital language processor.使用数字语言处理器对老年人的听觉和社交环境进行量化的可行性研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Sep;35(8):1301-5. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000489.
5
Vocal interaction between children with Down syndrome and their parents.唐氏综合征患儿与其父母之间的语音互动。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 Aug;23(3):474-85. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-12-0010.
6
Sensitivity to temporal fine structure and hearing-aid outcomes in older adults.老年人对时间精细结构的敏感性与助听器效果。
Front Neurosci. 2014 Feb 5;8:7. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00007. eCollection 2014.
7
Hearing status in older persons: a significant determinant of depression and loneliness? Results from the longitudinal aging study amsterdam.老年人的听力状况:抑郁和孤独感的重要决定因素?阿姆斯特丹纵向老龄化研究结果
Am J Audiol. 2013 Dec;22(2):316-20. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0069).
8
STARR: a speech test for evaluation of the effectiveness of auditory prostheses under realistic conditions.STARR:一种在现实条件下评估听觉假体效果的言语测试。
Ear Hear. 2013 Mar-Apr;34(2):203-12. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826a8e82.
9
Do older adults have social lifestyles that place fewer demands on hearing?老年人的社交生活方式对听力的要求较低吗?
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Oct;23(9):697-711. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.9.4.
10
Quantity of parental language in the home environments of hard-of-hearing 2-year-olds.听力受损的2岁儿童家庭环境中父母语言的数量。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2012 Fall;17(4):402-20. doi: 10.1093/deafed/ens025. Epub 2012 Aug 31.