Suppr超能文献

刺激性接触性皮炎中红斑的评估。视觉评分与激光多普勒血流仪的比较。

Assessment of erythema in irritant contact dermatitis. Comparison between visual scoring and laser Doppler flowmetry.

作者信息

Willis C M, Stephens C J, Wilkinson J D

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Wycombe General Hospital, Bucks, UK.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 1988 Mar;18(3):138-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1988.tb04499.x.

Abstract

Assessment of erythema in experimentally-induced irritant contact dermatitis has been performed visually and using the laser Doppler flowmeter (LDF). A close correlation was shown between the 2 methods (r = 0.9079, p less than 0.001), with the LDF producing mean blood flow values which were able to discriminate between the different visual scores. Of the 100 patch tests evaluated, 3 gave poor correlations between their visual and LDF readings, including 2 dithranol reactions and 1 sodium hydroxide response. Patch tests with no visible erythema had blood flow values similar to those of normal untreated skin. Although the LDF was an easy instrument to operate, it was not considered suitable for use in the routine patch test clinic, due mainly to the unacceptable length of time required to measure each patch test.

摘要

在实验性诱导的刺激性接触性皮炎中,已通过肉眼和使用激光多普勒血流仪(LDF)对红斑进行了评估。两种方法之间显示出密切的相关性(r = 0.9079,p < 0.001),LDF产生的平均血流值能够区分不同的视觉评分。在评估的100次斑贴试验中,有3次其视觉和LDF读数之间的相关性较差,包括2次地蒽酚反应和1次氢氧化钠反应。没有可见红斑的斑贴试验的血流值与未治疗的正常皮肤相似。尽管LDF是一种易于操作的仪器,但主要由于测量每次斑贴试验所需的时间过长而不被认为适合在常规斑贴试验诊所中使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验