Department of Marketing, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.
Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 May 21;21(6):792-798. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty076.
A between-subjects experiment examines the effects of different warning types and modified risk e-cigarette ad claims on adolescent e-cigarette craving and future e-cigarette susceptibility for two different themes. One theme focuses on nicotine and addiction, and the other on the effects of potentially harmful constituents (eg, flavored chemicals and lung disease).
The effects of warning type (control, text-only, graphic health warning [GHW] and text) and modified risk e-cigarette ad claims (control, exposure reduction, risk reduction) are tested experimentally with two different arms (themes) for a sample of 1011 adolescents who had tried either e-cigarettes or cigarettes.
For addiction, the text-only warning led to significantly less e-cigarette susceptibility than the no warning control condition. As expected, there were no differences between the GHW + text condition and text-only or control conditions for e-cigarette craving. An interaction between warning type and modified risk claims revealed significantly fewer e-cigarette cravings and less susceptibility for the text-only warning and no claim (control) condition than for any other condition. For fatal lung disease, the GHW + text condition led to fewer e-cigarette cravings and less susceptibility than the text-only warning and no warning (control) conditions.
Warning type effects can be very different under different themes (eg, addiction, fatal lung disease). In general, our results point to the effectiveness of the text-only warning for addiction and GHW + text for fatal lung disease. Relative exposure and risk modification claims (eg, less nicotine; less addicting) tend to undercut addiction warnings.
More than one type of e-cigarette warning may be necessary as e-cigarette research evolves. Our results show different warning type effects (eg, text-only; GHW + text) on e-cigarette craving and future susceptibility for adolescent experimenters depending on the risk theme (eg, addiction; lung disease) and presence of ad claims (eg, exposure and risk reduction). As research emerges on risks associated with e-cigarette use, it is important to first know what at-risk populations (eg, adolescents) believe about such risks. Such research will aid our understanding of what types of warnings might be most effective, especially in the presence of ad claims.
一项被试间实验考察了不同的警告类型和修改后的电子烟风险广告声明对两种不同主题的青少年电子烟渴望和未来电子烟易感性的影响。一个主题侧重于尼古丁和成瘾,另一个主题则侧重于潜在有害成分(如调味化学品和肺部疾病)的影响。
使用两种不同的臂(主题),对尝试过电子烟或香烟的 1011 名青少年进行了实验,测试了警告类型(对照、仅文本、图形健康警告 [GHW] 和文本)和修改后的电子烟风险广告声明(对照、减少暴露、降低风险)的效果。
对于成瘾,仅文本警告导致电子烟易感性明显低于无警告对照条件。不出所料,GHW + 文本条件与仅文本或对照条件在电子烟渴望方面没有差异。警告类型和修改后的风险声明之间的相互作用表明,仅文本警告和无声明(对照)条件比任何其他条件下电子烟渴望和易感性都明显减少。对于致命性肺部疾病,GHW + 文本条件导致的电子烟渴望和易感性低于仅文本警告和无警告(对照)条件。
在不同的主题下(例如成瘾、致命性肺部疾病),警告类型的影响可能会非常不同。一般来说,我们的结果表明,仅文本警告对于成瘾有效,而 GHW + 文本对于致命性肺部疾病有效。相对暴露和风险降低声明(例如,尼古丁含量较低;成瘾性较低)往往会削弱对成瘾的警告。
随着电子烟研究的发展,可能需要不止一种类型的电子烟警告。我们的结果表明,对于青少年实验者,不同的警告类型(例如仅文本;GHW + 文本)对电子烟渴望和未来易感性的影响取决于风险主题(例如成瘾;肺部疾病)和广告声明的存在(例如暴露和风险降低)。随着与电子烟使用相关的风险研究的出现,首先了解哪些高风险人群(例如青少年)对这些风险的看法非常重要。此类研究将有助于我们了解哪种类型的警告可能最有效,尤其是在存在广告声明的情况下。