Evolutionary Ecology Group, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.
Center for Environmental Sciences and Engineering and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-4210, USA.
Sci Adv. 2018 Mar 28;4(3):eaar6603. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aar6603. eCollection 2018 Mar.
Protecting aboveground carbon stocks in tropical forests is essential for mitigating global climate change and is assumed to simultaneously conserve biodiversity. Although the relationship between tree diversity and carbon stocks is generally positive, the relationship remains unclear for consumers or decomposers. We assessed this relationship for multiple trophic levels across the tree of life (10 organismal groups, 3 kingdoms) in lowland rainforests of the Congo Basin. Comparisons across regrowth and old-growth forests evinced the expected positive relationship for trees, but not for other organismal groups. Moreover, differences in species composition between forests increased with difference in carbon stock. These variable associations across the tree of life contradict the implicit assumption that maximum co-benefits to biodiversity are associated with conservation of forests with the highest carbon storage. Initiatives targeting climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation should include both old-growth and regenerating forests to optimally benefit biodiversity and carbon storage.
保护热带森林的地上碳储量对于缓解全球气候变化至关重要,并且被认为同时可以保护生物多样性。尽管树木多样性和碳储量之间通常呈正相关,但对于消费者或分解者而言,这种关系仍不清楚。我们在刚果盆地的低地雨林中评估了跨越生命之树(10 个生物类群,3 个王国)的多个营养级别的这种关系。在再生林和原始林之间的比较表明,树木之间存在预期的正相关关系,但其他生物类群则不然。此外,森林之间的物种组成差异随着碳储量的差异而增加。这些跨越生命之树的不同关联与隐含的假设相矛盾,即与最高碳储存的森林保护相关联的是对生物多样性的最大共同效益。针对气候变化缓解和生物多样性保护的倡议应同时包括原始林和再生林,以最大限度地受益于生物多样性和碳储存。