• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从生态视角看健康素养的前因后果:一项实验分析的结果。

The Antecedents and Consequences of Health Literacy in an Ecological Perspective: Results from an Experimental Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Health Science, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Firenze, Italy.

Quality and Equity Unit, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, 50141 Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 19;15(4):798. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040798.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph15040798
PMID:29671791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5923840/
Abstract

This study analyses the relationship between the antecedents and consequences of health literacy (HL) at the ecological level among the nations involved in the European Health Literacy Survey (HLS-EU). The antecedents and consequences were investigated by means of proxy indicators. The HL was measured using the 47-item HLS-EU questionnaire (HLS-EUQ47) and the Newest Vital Sign (NVS). The two measures stood in significant correlation to the outcomes of the sub-discipline of the Euro Health Consumer Index (r = 0.790 for HLS-EUQ47; r = 0.789 for NVS). The HLS-EUQ47 also stood in correlation to the percentage of population with post-secondary education (r = 0.810), the reading performance for 15-year-old students (r = 0.905), the presence of a national screening program for breast (r = 0.732) or cervical cancer (r = 0.873). The NVS stood in correlation with the unemployment rate (r = −0.778), the Gross Domestic Product (r = 0.719), the Gini coefficient (r = −0.743), the rank of the Euro Patient Empowerment Index (r = −0.826), the expenditure on social protection (r = 0.814), the Consumer Empowerment Index (r = 0.898), the percentage of adults using the internet for seeking health information (r = 0.759), the prevalence of overweight individuals (r = −0.843), the health expenditure (r = 0.766), as well as the percentage of individuals using the internet for interacting with public authorities (r = 0.755). This study provides some preliminary considerations regarding alternative means by which to study HL and proposes new methods for experimentation. The methods and the results could offer a means by which the relationship between society and overall healthcare protection could be strengthened.

摘要

本研究分析了参与欧洲健康素养调查(HLS-EU)的国家在生态层面上健康素养(HL)的前因和后果之间的关系。使用替代指标研究了前因和后果。HL 使用 47 项 HLS-EU 问卷(HLS-EUQ47)和最新生命体征(NVS)进行测量。这两种测量方法与欧洲健康消费者指数(Euro Health Consumer Index)的一个分支的结果呈显著相关(HLS-EUQ47 的 r = 0.790;NVS 的 r = 0.789)。HLS-EUQ47 还与接受过中学后教育的人口百分比(r = 0.810)、15 岁学生的阅读成绩(r = 0.905)、全国乳腺癌(r = 0.732)或宫颈癌筛查计划的存在(r = 0.873)相关。NVS 与失业率(r = −0.778)、国内生产总值(r = 0.719)、基尼系数(r = −0.743)、欧洲患者赋权指数(r = −0.826)的排名、社会保护支出(r = 0.814)、消费者赋权指数(r = 0.898)、成年人使用互联网寻求健康信息的百分比(r = 0.759)、超重人群的比例(r = −0.843)、健康支出(r = 0.766)以及个人使用互联网与公共当局互动的百分比(r = 0.755)相关。本研究提供了一些关于研究 HL 的替代方法的初步考虑,并提出了新的实验方法。这些方法和结果可以为加强社会与整体医疗保健保护之间的关系提供一种手段。

相似文献

1
The Antecedents and Consequences of Health Literacy in an Ecological Perspective: Results from an Experimental Analysis.从生态视角看健康素养的前因后果:一项实验分析的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 19;15(4):798. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040798.
2
Validation of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire in Women With Breast Cancer.欧洲健康素养调查问卷在乳腺癌女性中的效度验证。
Cancer Nurs. 2018 Mar/Apr;41(2):E40-E48. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000475.
3
Establishing the HLS-Q12 short version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire: latent trait analyses applying Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.建立欧洲健康素养调查问卷的HLS-Q12简版:应用拉施模型和验证性因素分析的潜在特质分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3275-7.
4
Being an Informed Consumer of Health Information and Assessment of Electronic Health Literacy in a National Sample of Internet Users: Validity and Reliability of the e-HLS Instrument.成为健康信息的明智消费者并在全国互联网用户样本中评估电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表(e-HLS)的有效性和可靠性
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 11;18(7):e161. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5496.
5
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire, HLS-EU-Q16: the Icelandic version.欧洲健康素养调查问卷(HLS-EU-Q16)的翻译和跨文化调适:冰岛版。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 14;20(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8162-6.
6
Determinants and Consequences of Limited Health Literacy in Polish Society.波兰社会有限健康素养的决定因素和后果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 19;17(2):642. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020642.
7
Validity and measurement invariance across sex, age, and education level of the French short versions of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire.法国版欧洲健康素养调查问卷短版在性别、年龄和教育水平上的有效性和测量不变性。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 6;13(12):e0208091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208091. eCollection 2018.
8
Measuring health literacy in Italy: a validation study of the HLS-EU-Q16 and of the HLS-EU-Q6 in Italian language, conducted in Florence and its surroundings.在意大利测量健康素养:一项针对意大利语版HLS-EU-Q16和HLS-EU-Q6的验证研究,在佛罗伦萨及其周边地区开展。
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2019 Jan-Mar;55(1):10-18. doi: 10.4415/ANN_19_01_04.
9
Determinants of health literacy in the general population: results of the Catalan health survey.一般人群健康素养的决定因素:加泰罗尼亚健康调查结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 16;19(1):1122. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7381-1.
10
Health Literacy Impact on National Healthcare Utilization and Expenditure.健康素养对国家医疗保健利用和支出的影响。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Aug 17;4(11):747-55. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.151.

引用本文的文献

1
Dementia knowledge of family caregivers in Indonesia: A cross-sectional survey study.印度尼西亚家庭照顾者的痴呆症知识:一项横断面调查研究。
Belitung Nurs J. 2024 Oct 14;10(5):523-530. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3457. eCollection 2024.
2
Vaccine literacy, vaccination intention, and their correlation among adults in Mainland China: a cross-sectional study.中国大陆成年人的疫苗素养、接种意愿及其相关性:一项横断面研究。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Aug 10;43(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00602-7.
3
Measuring adolescent health literacy in Taiwan: validation of the health literacy assessment scale for adolescents.测量台湾青少年健康素养:青少年健康素养评估量表的验证。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 4;23(1):2409. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17167-5.
4
Health risk communication and infodemic management in Iran: development and validation of a conceptual framework.伊朗的健康风险沟通和信息疫情管理:概念框架的制定和验证。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 30;13(7):e072326. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072326.
5
Health literacy and health information sources in relation to foodborne and waterborne diseases among adults in Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia, 2022: A community-based cross-sectional study.2022年埃塞俄比亚南部盖德奥地区成年人中与食源性和水源性疾病相关的健康素养及健康信息来源:一项基于社区的横断面研究
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 29;9(5):e15856. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15856. eCollection 2023 May.
6
COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review.COVID-19 疫苗素养:范围综述。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Dec 31;19(1):2176083. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2176083. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
7
Dementia is (not) a natural part of ageing: a cross-sectional study on dementia knowledge and misconceptions in Swiss and Italian young adults, adults, and older adults.痴呆症不是衰老的自然组成部分:一项关于瑞士和意大利年轻成年人、成年人和老年人对痴呆症知识和误解的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;22(1):2176. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14578-8.
8
Factors for Effective Identification of Patients at Nutritional Risk in Clinical Practice: Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Research.临床实践中有效识别营养风险患者的因素:定性研究的主题分析
Zdr Varst. 2022 Jun 28;61(3):191-197. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2022-0025. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
From Dimensions, Levels and Domains to Context-specific Conceptualizations of Health Literacy.从健康素养的维度、水平和领域到特定情境下的概念化
Zdr Varst. 2022 Jun 28;61(3):133-136. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2022-0018. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
Misinformation, believability, and vaccine acceptance over 40 countries: Takeaways from the initial phase of the COVID-19 infodemic.40 多个国家的错误信息、可信度与疫苗接种:新冠疫情信息流初始阶段的重要发现。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0263381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263381. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Punitive laws, key population size estimates, and Global AIDS Response Progress Reports: An ecological study of 154 countries.惩罚性法律、关键人群规模估计与全球艾滋病应对进展报告:一项对154个国家的生态研究
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Mar 17;20(1):21386. doi: 10.7448/IAS.20.1.21386.
2
Biostatistics Series Module 6: Correlation and Linear Regression.生物统计学系列模块6:相关性与线性回归。
Indian J Dermatol. 2016 Nov-Dec;61(6):593-601. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.193662.
3
Country-level correlates of e-cigarette use in the European Union.欧盟国家层面与电子烟使用相关的因素。
Int J Public Health. 2016 Mar;61(2):269-75. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0792-1. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
4
Health literacy: applying current concepts to improve health services and reduce health inequalities.健康素养:运用现有概念改善卫生服务和减少健康不平等。
Public Health. 2016 Mar;132:3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
5
The Relationship between Health Literacy and Health Disparities: A Systematic Review.健康素养与健康差距之间的关系:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0145455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145455. eCollection 2015.
6
Health Literacy Impact on National Healthcare Utilization and Expenditure.健康素养对国家医疗保健利用和支出的影响。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Aug 17;4(11):747-55. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.151.
7
Smoking dependence in 18 European countries: Hard to maintain the hardening hypothesis.18个欧洲国家的吸烟依赖性:难以维持强化假说。
Prev Med. 2015 Dec;81:314-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.09.023. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
8
Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Disease and Their Related Socio-Economical, Environmental and Health Behavioral Factors: Focused on Low-Middle Income Countries- A Narrative Review Article.心血管疾病的危险因素及其相关的社会经济、环境和健康行为因素:以中低收入国家为重点——一篇叙述性综述文章。
Iran J Public Health. 2015 Apr;44(4):435-44.
9
Different Measures, Different Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Performance-Based versus Self-Reported Measures of Health Literacy and Numeracy.不同的测量方法,不同的结果?基于表现与自我报告的健康素养和算术能力测量方法的系统评价
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Oct;30(10):1538-46. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3288-4. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
10
A critical review of population health literacy assessment.人口健康素养评估的批判性综述。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 4;15:215. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1551-6.