• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童脑卒中血管再通治疗的可行性、安全性和结局。

Feasibility, safety, and outcome of recanalization treatment in childhood stroke.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Child Neurology, University Children's Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern.

出版信息

Ann Neurol. 2018 Jun;83(6):1125-1132. doi: 10.1002/ana.25242.

DOI:10.1002/ana.25242
PMID:29679441
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy (IVT/EVT) are evidence-based treatments for adults with arterial ischemic stroke (AIS). However, randomized controlled trials in pediatric patients are lacking. This study aimed to describe feasibility, safety, and outcome of IVT/EVT in children with AIS.

METHODS

This retrospective study (01/2000-12/2015) included a multicenter, population-based consecutive cohort of patients aged 1 month to 16 years, diagnosed with AIS and presenting with pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (pedNIHSS) ≥ 4. Clinical and radiological data of patients receiving IVT/EVT were compared to those receiving standard care (SC) using linear regression to adjust for potential confounders. EVT included intra-arterial thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy. Outcome was assessed 6 months after stroke using the pediatric stroke outcome measure (PSOM).

RESULTS

Overall, 150 patients (age 7.1 ± 4.9 years, 55 [37%] females) presented with pedNIHSS ≥ 4. Recanalization treatment was performed in 16 (11%), of whom 5 (3%) were treated with IVT and 11 (7%) with EVT. Patients receiving recanalization treatment were older (mean age = 11.0 vs 6.9 years, p = 0.01) and more severely affected (median pedNIHSS = 13.5 vs 8.0, p < 0.001). Death and bleeding complications did not differ between the 2 groups. Median (interquartile range) PSOM 6 months after AIS was 2.5 (1-4.3) and 1 (0-2) in the IVT/EVT and SC groups, respectively (p = 0.014). However, after multiple linear regression analysis, only higher baseline pedNIHSS remained associated with an unfavorable outcome (p < 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

Recanalization treatment is feasible and seems to be safe in severely affected pediatric AIS patients. The assessment of efficacy of IVT/EVT in pediatric stroke patients requires larger studies. Ann Neurol 2018;83:1125-1132.

摘要

目的

静脉溶栓和血管内治疗(IVT/EVT)是治疗成人动脉缺血性脑卒中(AIS)的循证治疗方法。然而,儿科患者的随机对照试验却很缺乏。本研究旨在描述 AIS 患儿接受 IVT/EVT 的可行性、安全性和结局。

方法

本回顾性研究(2000 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月)纳入了多中心、基于人群的连续队列,研究对象为年龄在 1 个月至 16 岁、经诊断患有 AIS 且具有儿科国立卫生研究院卒中量表(pedNIHSS)评分≥4 分的患儿。采用线性回归对接受 IVT/EVT 与接受标准治疗(SC)的患儿的临床和影像学数据进行比较,以调整潜在的混杂因素。EVT 包括动脉内溶栓和/或机械血栓切除术。采用小儿卒中结局量表(PSOM)于卒中后 6 个月评估结局。

结果

共有 150 例患儿(年龄 7.1±4.9 岁,55 例[37%]为女性)具有 pedNIHSS 评分≥4 分。16 例(11%)患儿接受了再通治疗,其中 5 例(3%)接受了 IVT,11 例(7%)接受了 EVT。接受再通治疗的患儿年龄更大(平均年龄 11.0 岁 vs 6.9 岁,p=0.01),且病情更严重(中位数 pedNIHSS 评分 13.5 分 vs 8.0 分,p<0.001)。两组患儿的死亡和出血并发症发生率无差异。AIS 后 6 个月,IVT/EVT 组和 SC 组的 PSOM 中位数(四分位距)分别为 2.5(1-4.3)和 1(0-2)分(p=0.014)。然而,经多元线性回归分析,仅较高的基线 pedNIHSS 与不良结局相关(p<0.001)。

结论

严重 AIS 患儿接受再通治疗是可行的,且似乎安全。需要更大规模的研究来评估 IVT/EVT 在儿科卒中患儿中的疗效。

相似文献

1
Feasibility, safety, and outcome of recanalization treatment in childhood stroke.儿童脑卒中血管再通治疗的可行性、安全性和结局。
Ann Neurol. 2018 Jun;83(6):1125-1132. doi: 10.1002/ana.25242.
2
Recanalization Treatments for Pediatric Acute Ischemic Stroke in France.法国儿科急性缺血性脑卒中的再通治疗。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231343. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31343.
3
Bridging versus Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Subgroup Pooled Meta-Analysis for Time of Intervention, Eligibility, and Study Design.桥接与直接机械取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的比较:基于干预时间、入选标准和研究设计的亚组汇总荟萃分析。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(2):223-232. doi: 10.1159/000507844. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
4
Preceding Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients Receiving Endovascular Therapy.接受血管内治疗患者的静脉溶栓前情况
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;44(1-2):51-58. doi: 10.1159/000471492. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
5
Acute Ischemic Stroke Therapy in Infective Endocarditis: Case Series and Systematic Review.感染性心内膜炎中的急性缺血性卒中治疗:病例系列与系统评价
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Aug;28(8):2207-2212. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.04.039. Epub 2019 May 23.
6
MR CLEAN-NO IV: intravenous treatment followed by endovascular treatment versus direct endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke caused by a proximal intracranial occlusion-study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.MR CLEAN-NO IV:伴或不伴静脉治疗的血管内治疗与直接血管内治疗用于治疗因近端颅内闭塞引起的急性缺血性脑卒中:一项随机临床试验的研究方案
Trials. 2021 Feb 15;22(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05063-5.
7
Intravenous Thrombolysis Is Not Associated with Increased Time to Endovascular Treatment.静脉溶栓治疗与血管内治疗时间的延长无关。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(3):321-327. doi: 10.1159/000508898. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
8
Safety of Recanalization Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Under Anticoagulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急性缺血性卒中患者在抗凝治疗下进行再通治疗的安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Sep;27(9):2296-2305. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
9
Impact of intravenous thrombolysis on recanalization rates in patients with stroke treated with bridging therapy.静脉溶栓对接受桥接治疗的中风患者再通率的影响。
Eur J Neurol. 2017 Aug;24(8):1016-1021. doi: 10.1111/ene.13330. Epub 2017 Jun 25.
10
Shorter Door-to-Needle Times Are Associated With Better Outcomes After Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy and Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者接受静脉溶栓治疗和血管内取栓术时,门到针时间越短,结局越好。
Circulation. 2023 Jul 4;148(1):20-34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064053. Epub 2023 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Recurrent basilar artery thrombectomy for pediatric vertebral dissection: illustrative case.小儿椎动脉夹层的复发性基底动脉血栓切除术:病例说明
J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2025 Aug 18;10(7). doi: 10.3171/CASE24523.
2
Intravenous Thrombolysis for Pediatric Ischemic Stroke Secondary to Cancer Therapy-related Cardiac Dysfunction.静脉溶栓治疗癌症治疗相关心脏功能障碍继发的小儿缺血性卒中
Intern Med. 2025 Jan 15;64(2):287-291. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3755-24. Epub 2024 May 30.
3
Development of Collateral Vessels after Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion in Pediatric Arterial Ischemic Stroke Relates to Stroke Etiology: A Longitudinal Study.
前循环大血管闭塞性小儿动脉缺血性脑卒中后侧支循环的发展与卒中病因学相关:一项纵向研究。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Mar 7;45(3):271-276. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8114.
4
Decompressive hemicraniectomy in pediatric malignant arterial ischemic stroke: a case-based review.去骨瓣减压术治疗小儿恶性动脉缺血性脑卒中:基于病例的综述。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2023 Sep;39(9):2377-2389. doi: 10.1007/s00381-023-06086-w. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
5
Hemorrhagic Conversion of Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中的出血性转化。
Neurotherapeutics. 2023 Apr;20(3):705-711. doi: 10.1007/s13311-023-01377-1. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
6
Mechanical Thrombectomy for Pediatric Large Vessel Occlusions : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.儿童大血管闭塞的机械取栓:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2023 Sep;33(3):635-644. doi: 10.1007/s00062-022-01246-y. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
7
This infant is having a stroke: an illustrative case report.这个婴儿正在发生中风:一个说明性病例报告。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Oct;192(5):2467-2473. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03236-y. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
8
[Arterial ischemic stroke in childhood and adolescence : Time-critical emergency in pediatrics].[儿童和青少年动脉缺血性卒中:儿科的时间紧迫型急症]
Nervenarzt. 2022 Dec;93(12):1258-1270. doi: 10.1007/s00115-022-01409-9.
9
Recanalization Treatments for Pediatric Acute Ischemic Stroke in France.法国儿科急性缺血性脑卒中的再通治疗。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231343. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31343.
10
Hyperacute treatment of childhood stroke in Lyme neuroborreliosis: report of two cases and systematic review of the literature.莱姆病神经疏螺旋体病所致儿童卒中的超急性治疗:两例报告及文献系统综述
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2022 Jun 20;15:17562864221102842. doi: 10.1177/17562864221102842. eCollection 2022.