University of Applied Sciences Zurich, Institute of Physiotherapy, Technikumstrasse 71, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland; University of Lucerne, Department Health Sciences and Health Policy, Frohburgstrasse 3, CH-6002 Lucerne, Switzerland.
University of Applied Sciences Zurich, Institute of Physiotherapy, Technikumstrasse 71, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland.
Ageing Res Rev. 2018 Aug;45:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
Multicomponent interventions (MCT) combine physical exercises and cognitive training and seem to be most effective in improving cognition in elderly people. However, literature is inconclusive if MCTs are superior to active comparison interventions, if delivery modes matter, and if people can transfer achieved effects to instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). This network meta-analysis aimed to a) identify MCTs that were effective on physical capacity and/or cognitive function and able to transfer these effects into IADL in elderly people with normal cognition (NC) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI); b) provide a rating on the best interventions per outcome; c) evaluate MCTs' mode of delivery. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials comparing MCTs to active comparison or no treatments. Six studies in participants with MCI (n = 1088) and eleven studies in participants with NC (n = 670) were included. Five effective MCTs that were superior to physical exercises or cognitive training alone in improving physical capacity and/or cognitive function were detected, however none of these MCTs improved IADL. In people with NC MCTs performed separately or simultaneously were effective. However, in people with MCI MCTs performed separately were more effective. A framework needs to be developed to better understand the mediating effects of physical capacity and cognitive function on IADL and to design MCTs that effectively improve IADL.
多组分干预(MCT)结合了体育锻炼和认知训练,似乎在改善老年人认知方面最为有效。然而,关于 MCT 是否优于积极对照干预、交付模式是否重要以及人们是否可以将所获得的效果转移到日常生活活动(IADL)中,文献尚无定论。本网络荟萃分析旨在:a)确定对认知正常(NC)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)老年人的身体能力和/或认知功能有效的 MCT,并能够将这些效果转移到 IADL 中;b)对每个结果的最佳干预措施进行评分;c)评估 MCT 的交付模式。合格的研究是将 MCT 与积极对照或无治疗进行比较的随机对照试验。纳入了 6 项针对 MCI 参与者(n=1088)和 11 项针对 NC 参与者(n=670)的研究。检测到 5 种有效的 MCT,它们优于单独的体育锻炼或认知训练,可改善身体能力和/或认知功能,但没有一种 MCT 能改善 IADL。在 NC 人群中,MCT 单独或同时进行是有效的。然而,在 MCI 人群中,MCT 单独进行更有效。需要制定一个框架来更好地理解身体能力和认知功能对 IADL 的中介作用,并设计出能有效改善 IADL 的 MCT。