• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.过时的最大直径标准、生物力学(压力)指标的显著作用、血流动力学(流量)指标的新作用以及腹主动脉瘤破裂风险评估的多模态方法
Ann Vasc Dis. 2018 Mar 25;11(1):78-83. doi: 10.3400/avd.ra.17-00115.
2
Biomechanical indices are more sensitive than diameter in predicting rupture of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.生物力学指标比直径更能敏感地预测无症状性腹主动脉瘤的破裂。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Feb;71(2):617-626.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.03.051. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
3
Biomechanical Indices for Rupture Risk Estimation in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.用于腹主动脉瘤破裂风险评估的生物力学指标
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Apr;24(2):254-261. doi: 10.1177/1526602816680088. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
4
Estimation of wall properties and wall strength of aortic aneurysms using modern imaging techniques. One more step towards a patient-specific assessment of aneurysm rupture risk.利用现代成像技术评估主动脉瘤的壁特性和壁强度。这是朝着对动脉瘤破裂风险进行个体化评估迈出的又一步。
Med Hypotheses. 2013 Aug;81(2):212-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.04.048. Epub 2013 May 25.
5
In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk.机械壁应力与腹主动脉瘤破裂风险的体内分析
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Sep;36(3):589-97. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.125478.
6
Geometric surrogates of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall mechanics.腹主动脉瘤壁力学的几何替代指标。
Med Eng Phys. 2018 Sep;59:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
7
Low wall shear stress predominates at sites of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.低壁面切应力在腹主动脉瘤破裂部位占主导。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jun;63(6):1613-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.01.040. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
8
The - Not So - Solid 5.5 cm Threshold for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Facts, Misinterpretations, and Future Directions.腹主动脉瘤修复的并非那么可靠的5.5厘米阈值:事实、误解及未来方向
Front Surg. 2016 Jan 25;3:1. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00001. eCollection 2016.
9
Aortic Lumen Area Is Increased in Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and Correlates to Biomechanical Rupture Risk.主动脉管腔面积在破裂性腹主动脉瘤中增加,并与生物力学破裂风险相关。
J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Dec;25(6):750-756. doi: 10.1177/1526602818808292. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
10
Progression of abdominal aortic aneurysm towards rupture: refining clinical risk assessment using a fully coupled fluid-structure interaction method.腹主动脉瘤向破裂发展:使用全耦合流固相互作用方法优化临床风险评估。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2015 Jan;43(1):139-53. doi: 10.1007/s10439-014-1224-0. Epub 2014 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
New Trends of Personalized Medicine in the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Review.腹主动脉瘤治疗中个性化医疗的新趋势:综述
J Pers Med. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):1148. doi: 10.3390/jpm14121148.
2
Low and Oscillatory Wall Shear Stress Is Not Related to Aortic Dilation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve: A Time-Resolved 3-Dimensional Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.二维主动脉瓣患者低壁切应力和振荡壁切应力与主动脉扩张无关:时间分辨三维相位对比磁共振成像研究。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020 Jan;40(1):e10-e20. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313636. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
3
High-frequency murine ultrasound provides enhanced metrics of BAPN-induced AAA growth.高频鼠超声提供增强的 BAPN 诱导的 AAA 生长的指标。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019 Nov 1;317(5):H981-H990. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00300.2019. Epub 2019 Sep 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Improved Outcomes for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using Integrated Management Involving Endovascular Clamping, Endovascular Replacement, and Open Abdominal Decompression.采用包括血管内夹闭、血管内修复和开放腹部减压的综合管理方法改善破裂腹主动脉瘤的治疗效果。
Ann Vasc Dis. 2017 Mar 24;10(1):22-28. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.16-00110. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
2
A robust approach for exploring hemodynamics and thrombus growth associations in abdominal aortic aneurysms.一种用于探究腹主动脉瘤血流动力学与血栓生长关联的可靠方法。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017 Aug;55(8):1493-1506. doi: 10.1007/s11517-016-1610-x. Epub 2017 Jan 2.
3
Local Diameter, Wall Stress, and Thrombus Thickness Influence the Local Growth of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.局部直径、壁应力和血栓厚度影响腹主动脉瘤的局部生长。
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Dec;23(6):957-966. doi: 10.1177/1526602816657086. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
4
Aortic Aneurysm: Etiopathogenesis and Clinicopathologic Correlations.主动脉瘤:病因发病机制与临床病理相关性
Ann Vasc Dis. 2016;9(2):73-9. doi: 10.3400/avd.ra.16-00018. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
5
Endovascular repair or open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a Cochrane systematic review.腹主动脉瘤破裂的血管内修复或开放修复:一项Cochrane系统评价
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 12;6(2):e008391. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008391.
6
Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Patients Under Screening Age and Elective Repair Threshold.处于筛查年龄和择期修复阈值以下患者的腹主动脉瘤破裂
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;51(4):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.12.011. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
7
Association of Intraluminal Thrombus, Hemodynamic Forces, and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Expansion Using Longitudinal CT Images.利用纵向CT图像分析腔内血栓、血流动力学力与腹主动脉瘤扩张之间的关联
Ann Biomed Eng. 2016 May;44(5):1502-14. doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1461-x. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
8
Grading abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk.腹主动脉瘤破裂风险分级
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018 Feb;59(1):87-94. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.08848-0. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
9
Effect of intraluminal thrombus asymmetrical deposition on abdominal aortic aneurysm growth rate.腔内血栓不对称沉积对腹主动脉瘤生长速率的影响。
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Jun;22(3):406-12. doi: 10.1177/1526602815584018. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
10
Endovascular strategy or open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: one-year outcomes from the IMPROVE randomized trial.腹主动脉瘤破裂的血管内治疗策略或开放修复术:IMPROVE随机试验的一年结果
Eur Heart J. 2015 Aug 14;36(31):2061-2069. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv125. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

过时的最大直径标准、生物力学(压力)指标的显著作用、血流动力学(流量)指标的新作用以及腹主动脉瘤破裂风险评估的多模态方法

The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

作者信息

Kontopodis Nikolaos, Tzirakis Konstantinos, Ioannou Christos V

机构信息

Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technological Educational Institute of Crete, Estavromenos, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Dis. 2018 Mar 25;11(1):78-83. doi: 10.3400/avd.ra.17-00115.

DOI:10.3400/avd.ra.17-00115
PMID:29682111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5882355/
Abstract

Although the therapeutic management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is currently based on the maximum diameter criterion, this has often proved inaccurate and misleading. Conversely, the biomechanical approach, which takes into account the pressure-induced wall stress exerted at every point throughout the aneurysmal surface, has been proven superior in predicting the rupture risk of AAAs, and its value is being increasingly recognized among physicians. More recently, hemodynamic indices, such as flow-induced wall shear stresses, have been indicated as potentially significant determinants of AAA natural history. Ultimately, a statistical model that takes into account all these factors may be relevant for making a sound prediction of the rupture risk of aneurysms and optimizing the management of these patients.

摘要

尽管目前腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的治疗管理是基于最大直径标准,但这常常被证明是不准确和具有误导性的。相反,生物力学方法考虑了在整个动脉瘤表面每个点上由压力引起的壁应力,已被证明在预测AAA破裂风险方面更具优势,其价值在医生中越来越受到认可。最近,诸如血流诱导的壁面剪应力等血流动力学指标已被指出可能是AAA自然病程的重要决定因素。最终,一个考虑所有这些因素的统计模型可能对于合理预测动脉瘤破裂风险和优化这些患者的管理具有重要意义。