Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Jul;37(1):71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
How many patients in Denmark were treated with fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and what was their prognosis compared with patients treated with radical surgery (RS)?
This study was a retrospective Danish nationwide study, evaluating the effect of FSS compared with RS in patients with EOC, age ≤45 years and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage ≤IC3 from 2005 to 2016.
A total of 106 patients were included. Of these, 13 were treated with FSS and 93 were treated with RS. Median age was 27 versus 42 years (P < 0.0001). Overall survival did not differ significantly between the two groups. Overall survival rate in the FSS group was 100%, while the overall survival in the RS group was 87%. Disease-specific survival was 100% in the FSS group and 91% in the RS group.
This study shows that patients treated with FSS for FIGO stage I EOC do not have an impaired survival compared with patients treated with RS. Nevertheless, the conclusion must be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of patients and the retrospective nature of the study. Larger studies are needed before conclusions can be drawn.
在丹麦,有多少上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者接受了保留生育功能的手术(FSS)治疗,与接受根治性手术(RS)治疗的患者相比,他们的预后如何?
本研究是一项回顾性丹麦全国性研究,评估了 2005 年至 2016 年期间,年龄≤45 岁且国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期≤IC3 的 EOC 患者接受 FSS 与 RS 治疗的效果。
共纳入 106 例患者,其中 13 例接受 FSS 治疗,93 例接受 RS 治疗。中位年龄分别为 27 岁和 42 岁(P<0.0001)。两组患者的总生存率无显著差异。FSS 组的总生存率为 100%,而 RS 组的总生存率为 87%。FSS 组的疾病特异性生存率为 100%,RS 组为 91%。
本研究表明,接受 FSS 治疗的 FIGO 分期 I 期 EOC 患者的生存率与接受 RS 治疗的患者无差异。然而,由于患者数量有限且研究为回顾性,因此必须谨慎解释这一结论。需要更大规模的研究才能得出结论。