• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

涉及痴呆症患者的定性研究的安全与包容性研究实践:关键问题与策略综述

Safe and Inclusive Research Practices for Qualitative Research Involving People with Dementia: A Review of Key Issues and Strategies.

作者信息

Novek Sheila, Wilkinson Heather

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

Edinburgh Centre for Research on the Experiences of Dementia (E-CRED), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Dementia (London). 2019 Apr;18(3):1042-1059. doi: 10.1177/1471301217701274. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1177/1471301217701274
PMID:28350179
Abstract

AIM

Developing strategies to ensure the safe participation of people with dementia in research is critical to support their wider inclusion in research and to advance knowledge in the areas of dementia policy and practice.

OBJECTIVES

This literature review synthesizes and critically appraises different approaches to promote the safe participation of people with dementia in qualitative research.

METHODS

Two databases were searched for articles that discuss the methodological or ethical aspects of qualitative research involving people with dementia. We did not focus on informed consent or ethical review processes as these have been reviewed elsewhere.

FINDINGS

Key issues that impact participant safety include: language, gatekeepers, the research relationship, communication, dealing with distress, knowledge dissemination, and researcher skills.

CONCLUSION

By synthesizing different approaches to safety and highlighting areas of debate, we hope to advance discussion and to contribute to the development of inclusive research methods.

摘要

目的

制定策略以确保痴呆症患者安全参与研究对于支持他们更广泛地融入研究以及推进痴呆症政策和实践领域的知识至关重要。

目标

本文献综述综合并批判性地评估了促进痴呆症患者安全参与定性研究的不同方法。

方法

检索了两个数据库,以查找讨论涉及痴呆症患者的定性研究的方法学或伦理方面的文章。我们没有关注知情同意或伦理审查过程,因为这些已在其他地方进行了审查。

结果

影响参与者安全的关键问题包括:语言、把关人、研究关系、沟通、应对困扰、知识传播和研究人员技能。

结论

通过综合不同的安全方法并突出辩论领域,我们希望推动讨论并为包容性研究方法的发展做出贡献。

相似文献

1
Safe and Inclusive Research Practices for Qualitative Research Involving People with Dementia: A Review of Key Issues and Strategies.涉及痴呆症患者的定性研究的安全与包容性研究实践:关键问题与策略综述
Dementia (London). 2019 Apr;18(3):1042-1059. doi: 10.1177/1471301217701274. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
2
Ethical and methodological issues in interviewing persons with dementia.访谈痴呆症患者时的伦理和方法学问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2007 Sep;14(5):608-19. doi: 10.1177/0969733007080206.
3
Ethical and methodological issues in qualitative studies involving people with severe and persistent mental illness such as schizophrenia and other psychotic conditions: a critical review.涉及精神分裂症和其他精神病性障碍等严重持续性精神疾病患者的定性研究中的伦理和方法学问题:一项批判性综述。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2017;12(sup2):1368323. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2017.1368323.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Ethical issues when involving people newly diagnosed with dementia in research.将新诊断出患有痴呆症的患者纳入研究时的伦理问题。
Nurse Res. 2015 Mar;22(4):25-9. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.4.25.e1308.
6
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
7
Methodological and ethical issues in conducting qualitative research with children and young people: a literature review.针对儿童和青少年开展定性研究时的方法学与伦理问题:一项文献综述
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Sep;44(7):1250-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.015. Epub 2006 Oct 9.
8
Articulating the strategies for maximising the inclusion of people with dementia in qualitative research studies.阐明在定性研究中最大限度纳入痴呆症患者的策略。
Dementia (London). 2015 Nov;14(6):800-24. doi: 10.1177/1471301213512489. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
9
Qualitative research ethics on the spot: Not only on the desktop.现场的定性研究伦理:不仅仅是在案头工作中。
Nurs Ethics. 2016 Jun;23(4):455-64. doi: 10.1177/0969733014567023. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
10
Ethics in qualitative health research.定性健康研究中的伦理问题。
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 2002 Dec;35(8 Suppl.):563-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods for Involving People With Dementia in Health Policy and Guideline Development: A Scoping Review.让痴呆症患者参与卫生政策和指南制定的方法:一项范围综述
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70250. doi: 10.1111/hex.70250.
2
Experiences and needs of residents with dementia in relocating to an innovative living arrangement within long-term care: A qualitative study.痴呆症患者在长期护理机构中迁至创新生活安排的经历与需求:一项定性研究。
Dementia (London). 2025 Oct;24(7):1225-1240. doi: 10.1177/14713012241311433. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
3
Communicative and Methodological Challenges Related to Collecting Data with Older Adults with Dementia in Senior Living Communities During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
在新冠疫情期间,与在老年生活社区中对患有痴呆症的老年人进行数据收集相关的沟通和方法挑战。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2025 Jul;101(1):90-111. doi: 10.1177/00914150241300892. Epub 2024 Dec 8.
4
Embracing Complexity Within Creative Approaches to Dementia Research: Ethics, Reflexivity, and Research Practices.在痴呆症研究的创造性方法中拥抱复杂性:伦理、反思性与研究实践。
Int J Qual Methods. 2023 Apr 2;22:16094069231165932. doi: 10.1177/16094069231165932. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Discussing methodological gaps in psychosocial intervention research for dementia: an opinion article from the INTERDEM Methodology Taskforce guided by the MRC framework.探讨痴呆症心理社会干预研究中的方法学差距:一篇由MRC框架指导的INTERDEM方法学工作组撰写的观点文章。
Front Dement. 2024 Sep 26;3:1458023. doi: 10.3389/frdem.2024.1458023. eCollection 2024.
6
Engaging people with lived experience of dementia in research meetings and events: insights from multiple perspectives.让有痴呆症亲身经历的人参与研究会议和活动:多视角见解
Front Dement. 2024 Jul 5;3:1421737. doi: 10.3389/frdem.2024.1421737. eCollection 2024.
7
How do quantitative studies involving people with dementia report experiences of standardised data collection? A narrative synthesis of NIHR published studies.涉及痴呆症患者的定量研究如何报告标准化数据收集的经验?基于 NIHR 已发表研究的叙述性综合。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Feb 16;24(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02148-y.
8
Use of adapted or modified methods with people with dementia in research: A scoping review.使用适应或修改的方法对痴呆症患者进行研究:范围综述。
Dementia (London). 2023 Nov;22(8):1994-2023. doi: 10.1177/14713012231205610. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
9
Standardised data collection from people with dementia over the telephone: A qualitative study of the experience of DETERMIND programme researchers in a pandemic.电话中对痴呆症患者进行标准化数据收集:DETERMIND 项目研究人员在大流行期间的经验定性研究。
Dementia (London). 2023 Nov;22(8):1718-1737. doi: 10.1177/14713012231190585. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
10
Learning to use music as a resource: the experiences of people with dementia and their family care partners participating in a home-based skill-sharing music intervention: a HOMESIDE sub-study.学习将音乐作为一种资源:痴呆症患者及其家庭护理伙伴参与家庭技能共享音乐干预的经历:一项HOMESIDE子研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 18;10:1205784. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1205784. eCollection 2023.