• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院期间出血与高出血风险急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用普拉格雷 2.5mg 维持剂量的相关性。

In-Hospital Bleeding and Utility of a Maintenance Dose of Prasugrel 2.5 mg in High Bleeding Risk Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital.

出版信息

Circ J. 2018 Jun 25;82(7):1874-1883. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0114. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0114
PMID:29695656
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data on bleeding events in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are insufficient. In addition, the efficacy and safety of a maintenance dose of prasugrel 2.5 mg/day in high bleeding risk patients are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively enrolled 1,167 consecutive patients with suspected ACS and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The maintenance dose of prasugrel 2.5 mg/day was prescribed for patients with a low body weight (≤50 kg), elderly (≥75 years), or renal insufficiency (eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m). In-hospital events were assessed in 992 ACS patients treated with drug-eluting stents. Excluding 29 in-hospital deaths, out-of-hospital events were assessed in 963 ACS patients. The primary safety outcome measure was major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 and 5). The incidence of in-hospital major bleeding was 3.4%. Multivariate analysis showed that being elderly, low body weight, renal insufficiency, stroke history, femoral approach, and mechanical support usage were independent predictors of in-hospital major bleeding. The cumulative 1-year incidence of out-of-hospital major bleeding was not significantly different between the prasugrel 2.5 mg/day (n=284) and 3.75 mg/day (n=487) groups (1.6% vs. 0.7%, log-rank P=0.24). That of out-of-hospital definite or probable stent thrombosis was 0% in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The maintenance dose of adjusted prasugrel 2.5 mg/day seems to be one option in ACS patients at high bleeding risk.

摘要

背景

关于急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)日本患者出血事件的数据不足。此外,高出血风险患者使用普拉格雷 2.5mg/日维持剂量的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。

方法和结果

我们前瞻性纳入了 1167 例疑似 ACS 并接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的连续患者。对于体重较轻(≤50kg)、年龄较大(≥75 岁)或肾功能不全(eGFR≤30mL/min/1.73m)的患者,处方普拉格雷 2.5mg/日维持剂量。992 例接受药物洗脱支架治疗的 ACS 患者评估住院期间事件。排除 29 例住院期间死亡患者,963 例 ACS 患者评估院外事件。主要安全性结局指标为主要出血(BARC 类型 3 和 5)。住院期间主要出血的发生率为 3.4%。多变量分析显示,年龄较大、体重较轻、肾功能不全、卒中史、股动脉入路和机械支持使用是住院期间主要出血的独立预测因素。普拉格雷 2.5mg/日(n=284)和 3.75mg/日(n=487)组 1 年累计院外主要出血发生率无显著差异(1.6% vs. 0.7%,对数秩 P=0.24)。两组的院外明确或可能支架血栓形成发生率均为 0%。

结论

调整后的普拉格雷 2.5mg/日维持剂量似乎是高出血风险 ACS 患者的一种选择。

相似文献

1
In-Hospital Bleeding and Utility of a Maintenance Dose of Prasugrel 2.5 mg in High Bleeding Risk Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.住院期间出血与高出血风险急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用普拉格雷 2.5mg 维持剂量的相关性。
Circ J. 2018 Jun 25;82(7):1874-1883. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0114. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
2
Impact of reduced-dose prasugrel vs. standard-dose clopidogrel on in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in 62 737 patients with acute coronary syndromes: a nationwide registry study in Japan.在 62737 例急性冠脉综合征患者中,与标准剂量氯吡格雷相比,使用低剂量普拉格雷对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗住院结局的影响:一项日本全国注册研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020 Jul 1;6(4):231-238. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz056.
3
Prasugrel-based de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS): an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised trial.基于普拉格雷的急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗降级(HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS):一项开放标签、多中心、非劣效性随机试验。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 10;396(10257):1079-1089. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31791-8. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
4
Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of coronary artery diseases--comparison of REDUCtion of prasugrEl dose or POLYmer TECHnology in ACS patients (HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS RCT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.优化冠状动脉疾病治疗策略——急性冠状动脉综合征患者中普拉格雷剂量降低或聚合物技术比较(HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS随机对照试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Sep 15;16:409. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0925-5.
5
Ischemic and Bleeding Events Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Associated With Low-Dose Prasugrel vs Standard-Dose Clopidogrel Treatment.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中与低剂量普拉格雷与标准剂量氯吡格雷治疗相关的缺血和出血事件。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202004. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2004.
6
Associations Between Chronic Kidney Disease and Outcomes With Use of Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the PROMETHEUS Study.慢性肾脏病与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用普拉格雷与氯吡格雷治疗结局的相关性:来自 PROMETHEUS 研究的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 23;10(20):2017-2025. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.047. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
7
Competing risks of major bleeding and thrombotic events with prasugrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy after stent implantation - An observational analysis from BASKET-PROVE II.支架植入术后基于普拉格雷的双联抗血小板治疗的主要出血和血栓事件的竞争风险 - BASKET-PROVE II 的观察性分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 15;14(1):e0210821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210821. eCollection 2019.
8
Time Course of Ischemic and Bleeding Burden in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Randomized to Low-Dose Prasugrel or Clopidogrel.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受低剂量普拉格雷或氯吡格雷治疗的缺血和出血负担的时间过程。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jan 22;8(2):e010956. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010956.
9
A randomised trial on platelet function-guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Rationale and design of the Testing Responsiveness to Platelet Inhibition on Chronic Antiplatelet Treatment for Acute Coronary Syndromes (TROPICAL-ACS) Trial.一项关于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者血小板功能引导下抗血小板治疗降阶梯的随机试验。急性冠状动脉综合征慢性抗血小板治疗中血小板抑制反应性测试(TROPICAL-ACS)试验的原理与设计。
Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jan 5;117(1):188-195. doi: 10.1160/TH16-07-0557. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
10
Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (TROPICAL-ACS): a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的抗血小板治疗降级指导(TROPICAL-ACS):一项随机、开放标签、多中心试验。
Lancet. 2017 Oct 14;390(10104):1747-1757. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32155-4. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Reduced-Dose Prasugrel After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Taiwanese Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.台湾急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后使用低剂量普拉格雷的临床疗效与安全性
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 27;13(23):7221. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237221.
2
Sex Differences in Bleeding Risk Associated With Antithrombotic Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗栓治疗相关出血风险的性别差异
Circ Rep. 2024 Mar 5;6(4):99-109. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0015. eCollection 2024 Apr 10.
3
Pseudoxanthoma elasticum resulting in acute coronary syndrome.
弹性假黄瘤导致急性冠状动脉综合征。
J Cardiol Cases. 2022 Aug 16;26(4):308-310. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2022.06.004. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
A Japanese Dose of Prasugrel versus a Standard Dose of Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction from the K-ACTIVE Registry.K-ACTIVE注册研究:日本剂量普拉格雷与标准剂量氯吡格雷治疗急性心肌梗死患者的比较
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 4;11(7):2016. doi: 10.3390/jcm11072016.
5
Comparison of Hemorrhagic Risk between Prasugrel and Clopidogrel: a Retrospective Study using Adverse Drug Event Reporting Databases.比较普拉格雷和氯吡格雷的出血风险:一项使用药物不良反应报告数据库的回顾性研究。
Int J Med Sci. 2020 Mar 5;17(6):728-733. doi: 10.7150/ijms.43168. eCollection 2020.