Egleston Brian L, Pedraza Omar, Wong Yu-Ning, Griffin Candace L, Ross Eric A, Beck J Robert
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, 333 Cottman Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Jan 31;9:135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.01.004. eCollection 2018 Mar.
Increasing diversity in clinical trials may be worthwhile. We examined clinical trials that restricted eligibility to a single race or ethnicity.
We reviewed 19,246 trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov through January 2013. We mapped trial ZIP-codes to U.S. Census and American Community Survey data. The outcome was whether trials required participants to be from a single racial or ethnic group.
In adjusted analyses, the odds of trials restricting eligibility to a single race/ethnicity increased by 4% per year (95% CI 1.01-1.08, p = .024). Behavioral (5.79% with single race/ethnicity requirements), skin-related (4.49%), and Vitamin D (6.14%) studies had higher rates of single race/ethnicity requirements. Many other trial-specific characteristics, such as funding agency and region of the U.S. in which the trial opened, were associated with eligibility restrictions. In terms of neighborhood characteristics, studies with single race eligibility requirements were more likely to be located in ZIP-codes with greater percentages of those self-reporting the characteristic. For example, 35.2% (SD = 24.9%) of the population self-reported themselves as Black or African American in ZIP-codes with trials requiring participants to be Black/African American, but only 5.9% (SD = 6.9%) self-reported themselves as Black/African American in ZIP-codes with trials that required Asian ethnicity. In ZIP-codes with trials requiring Asian ethnicity, 24.6% (SD = 16.2%) self-reported as Asian. In ZIP-codes with trials requiring Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, 33.3% (SD = 28.5%) self-reported as Hispanic/Latino. Neighborhood level poverty rates and reduced English language ability were also associated with more single race eligibility requirements.
In selected fields, there has been a modest temporal increase in single race/ethnicity inclusion requirements. Some studies may not fall under regulatory purview and hence may be less likely to include diverse samples. Conversely, some eligibility requirements may be related to health disparities research. Future work should examine whether targeted enrollment criteria facilitates development of personalized medicine or reduces trial access.
增加临床试验的多样性可能是有价值的。我们研究了将入选资格限制在单一种族或族裔的临床试验。
我们回顾了截至2013年1月在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的19246项试验。我们将试验的邮政编码映射到美国人口普查和美国社区调查数据。结果是试验是否要求参与者来自单一的种族或族裔群体。
在调整分析中,将入选资格限制在单一种族/族裔的试验的几率每年增加4%(95%CI 1.01-1.08,p = 0.024)。行为学(5.79%有单一种族/族裔要求)、皮肤相关(4.49%)和维生素D(6.14%)研究有更高的单一种族/族裔要求率。许多其他特定试验特征,如资助机构和试验开展所在的美国地区,与入选资格限制有关。就社区特征而言,有单一种族入选要求的研究更有可能位于自我报告该特征比例更高的邮政编码区域。例如,在要求参与者为黑人/非裔美国人的试验所在的邮政编码区域,35.2%(标准差 = 24.9%)的人口自我报告为黑人或非裔美国人,但在要求亚洲族裔的试验所在的邮政编码区域,只有5.9%(标准差 = 6.9%)的人自我报告为黑人/非裔美国人。在要求亚洲族裔的试验所在的邮政编码区域,24.6%(标准差 = 16.2%)的人自我报告为亚洲人。在要求西班牙裔/拉丁裔族裔的试验所在的邮政编码区域,33.3%(标准差 = 28.5%)的人自我报告为西班牙裔/拉丁裔。社区层面的贫困率和英语能力下降也与更多的单一种族入选要求有关。
在某些选定领域,单一种族/族裔入选要求有适度的时间性增加。一些研究可能不属于监管范围,因此可能不太可能纳入多样化样本。相反,一些入选要求可能与健康差异研究有关。未来的工作应研究有针对性的入选标准是否有助于个性化医疗的发展或减少试验参与机会。