Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Rd., Tainan City, 701, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Rd., Tainan City, 701, Taiwan, Republic of China.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Sep;48(9):3191-3198. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3585-y.
This study aimed to compare symptoms of autism spectrum disorder using the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) and the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS™-2) and to investigate their influencing factors. The diagnostic agreement was 92.7%, but with a fair Kappa value (0.247). Children's verbal comprehension was related to the CARS scores, and no variables were related to the SRS™-2 scores. Generally, significant small correlations were found between the two measures in children with normal or borderline to below average verbal comprehension (rs = 0.32 ~ 0.49, p < .005), but not in those with impaired verbal comprehension. The CARS and the SRS™-2 may contain different explicit behaviors and collect different perspectives (i.e., those of caregivers and professionals). Therefore, they appear to complement each other.
本研究旨在使用儿童自闭症评定量表(CARS)和社会反应量表(SRSTM-2)比较自闭症谱系障碍的症状,并探讨其影响因素。诊断的符合率为 92.7%,但 Kappa 值适中(0.247)。儿童的语言理解能力与 CARS 评分有关,而 SRSTM-2 评分与任何变量均无关。一般来说,在语言理解能力正常或处于中下水平的儿童中,这两种测量方法之间存在显著的小相关关系(rs=0.32~0.49,p<0.005),但在语言理解能力受损的儿童中则没有。CARS 和 SRSTM-2 可能包含不同的显性行为,并收集不同的观点(即照顾者和专业人员的观点)。因此,它们似乎是相辅相成的。