Suppr超能文献

元记忆与对多种字体大小的记忆:知觉流畅性有何作用?

Metamemory and memory for a wide range of font sizes: What is the contribution of perceptual fluency?

作者信息

Undorf Monika, Zimdahl Malte F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):97-109. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000571. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

Abstract

Words printed in a larger 48-point font are judged to be more memorable than words printed in a smaller 18-point font, although font size does not affect actual memory. To clarify the basis of this font size effect on metamemory and memory, 4 experiments investigated how presenting words in 48 (Experiment 1) or 4 (Experiments 2 to 4) font sizes between 6 point and 500 point affected judgments of learning (JOLs) and recall performance. Response times in lexical decision tasks were used to measure perceptual fluency. In all experiments, perceptual fluency was lower for words presented in very small and very large font sizes than for words presented in intermediate font sizes. In contrast, JOLs increased monotonically with font size, even beyond the point where a large font impaired perceptual fluency. Assessments of people's metacognitive beliefs about font size revealed that the monotonic increase in JOLs was not due to beliefs masking perceptual fluency effects (Experiment 3). Also, JOLs still increased across the whole range of font sizes when perceptual fluency was made salient at study (Experiment 4). In all experiments but Experiment 4, recall performance increased with increasing font size, although to a lesser extent than JOLs. Overall, the current study supports the idea that metacognitive beliefs underlie font size effects in metamemory. As important, it reveals that people's font size beliefs have some accuracy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

用48磅较大字体打印的单词被认为比用18磅较小字体打印的单词更容易被记住,尽管字体大小并不影响实际记忆。为了阐明这种字体大小效应在元记忆和记忆方面的基础,4个实验研究了以6磅至500磅之间的48种(实验1)或4种(实验2至4)字体呈现单词如何影响学习判断(JOLs)和回忆表现。词汇判断任务中的反应时间被用来测量感知流畅性。在所有实验中,与以中等字体呈现的单词相比,以非常小和非常大字体呈现的单词的感知流畅性更低。相比之下,JOLs随着字体大小单调增加,甚至超过了大字体损害感知流畅性的那个点。对人们关于字体大小的元认知信念的评估表明,JOLs的单调增加并不是由于信念掩盖了感知流畅性效应(实验3)。此外,当在学习时使感知流畅性变得显著时,JOLs在整个字体大小范围内仍然增加(实验4)。在除实验4之外的所有实验中,回忆表现随着字体大小的增加而提高,尽管程度小于JOLs。总体而言,当前的研究支持了元认知信念是元记忆中字体大小效应基础的观点。同样重要的是,它揭示了人们关于字体大小的信念具有一定的准确性。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2018美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验