Suppr超能文献

微创食管切除术的围手术期管理与结果:台湾一家大型三级中心的病例研究

Perioperative management and outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy: case study of a high-volume tertiary center in Taiwan.

作者信息

Chang Tzu, Hsiao Po-Ni, Tsai Man-Yin, Huang Pei-Ming, Cheng Ya-Jung

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei.

Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(3):1670-1676. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.147.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mortality and complication rates for surgical esophagectomy remain high despite progress in surgical techniques and perioperative care. Minimally invasive surgery and intraoperative goal-directed fluid management are gaining popularity in Taiwan; however, perioperative complications and short-term outcomes have been rarely reported. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the surgical procedures performed as well as the perioperative outcomes and treatments after esophagectomy in a high-volume medical center in Taiwan. The goals of this study are to compare the complications and the following treatment between different surgical procedures and to analyze if any preoperative coexisting disease and anesthesia conduct might be associated with postoperative complications and hospitalization course.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients who had undergone esophagectomy and reconstruction in 2015. Patient characteristics, type of surgery performed, method of anesthesia, postoperative hospitalization course, and additional surgical interventions were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 64 patients were included. Among them, 58 patients (90.6%) were reported squamous cell carcinoma, 33 patients (51.6%) received McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), and 20 (31.3%) received Ivor-Lewis MIE. The most common postoperative complications were pulmonary complications (18.7%), such as empyema and pleural effusion, dysrhythmias (14.1%), anastomosis leakage (14.1%), vocal cord paralysis (9.4%), gastric tube stenosis (4.7%), chyle leakage (4.7%), and acute kidney injury (AKI, 4.7%). Twenty-five percent of patients received secondary operative interventions for the aforementioned complications. Postoperative arrhythmia (P=0.042), pulmonary complications (P=0.009), and AKI (P=0.015) were significantly associated with prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Thirty-day and 90-day mortality rates were 3.1% and 4.7% respectively. Patients with preoperative arrhythmias have a higher risk of developing post-operative dysrhythmia (P=0.013) and lung complications (P=0.036). Patients with an underlying heart disease are at higher risk of post-op AKI (P=0.002) and second surgical intervention (P=0.013). Chronic kidney diseases are associated with post-op dysrhythmia (P=0.013), lung complications (P=0.036) and post-op AKI (P≤0.01). Although McKeown MIE bore a significantly longer surgical time and higher intraoperatively-infused crystalloid than did Ivor Lewis MIE, there were no significant differences regarding postoperative cardiothoracic complications and patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative outcomes of McKeown MIE and Ivor-Lewis MIE were comparable in our center and short term outcomes were similar to those in previous reports. However, despite neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT), the use of minimally invasive techniques, and well-controlled anesthesia, the incidence of perioperative complications remains high. Our results suggest that patients with preoperative comorbidity of arrhythmia, heart diseases, and CKD are associated with more common post-operative complications. Furthermore, postoperative dysrhythmias, pulmonary complications, and AKI warrant special anesthetic and surgical care to prevent prolonged ICU stay.

摘要

背景

尽管手术技术和围手术期护理取得了进展,但手术切除食管的死亡率和并发症发生率仍然很高。微创手术和术中目标导向液体管理在台湾越来越受欢迎;然而,围手术期并发症和短期结果很少被报道。在这项回顾性研究中,我们分析了台湾一家大型医疗中心食管切除术后的手术操作、围手术期结果和治疗情况。本研究的目的是比较不同手术操作之间的并发症及后续治疗,并分析术前并存疾病和麻醉方式是否可能与术后并发症及住院过程相关。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2015年所有接受食管切除和重建手术患者的数据。对患者特征、手术类型、麻醉方法、术后住院过程及额外的手术干预进行了回顾和分析。

结果

共纳入64例患者。其中,58例(90.6%)为鳞状细胞癌,33例(51.6%)接受了麦克尤恩微创食管切除术(MIE),20例(31.3%)接受了艾弗-刘易斯MIE。最常见的术后并发症是肺部并发症(18.7%),如脓胸和胸腔积液、心律失常(14.1%)、吻合口漏(14.1%)、声带麻痹(9.4%)、胃管狭窄(4.7%)、乳糜漏(4.7%)和急性肾损伤(AKI,4.7%)。25%的患者因上述并发症接受了二次手术干预。术后心律失常(P=0.042)、肺部并发症(P=0.009)和AKI(P=0.015)与重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间延长显著相关。30天和90天死亡率分别为3.1%和4.7%。术前有心律失常的患者术后发生心律失常(P=0.013)和肺部并发症(P=0.036)的风险更高。有基础心脏病的患者术后发生AKI(P=0.002)和二次手术干预(P=0.013)的风险更高。慢性肾脏病与术后心律失常(P=0.013)、肺部并发症(P=0.036)和术后AKI(P≤0.01)相关。尽管麦克尤恩MIE的手术时间明显长于艾弗-刘易斯MIE,术中输注的晶体液也更多,但术后心胸并发症和患者结局并无显著差异。

结论

在我们中心,麦克尤恩MIE和艾弗-刘易斯MIE的术后结局相当,短期结局与既往报道相似。然而,尽管采用了新辅助同步放化疗(CCRT)、微创技术和良好控制的麻醉,围手术期并发症的发生率仍然很高。我们的结果表明,术前合并心律失常、心脏病和慢性肾脏病的患者术后并发症更常见。此外,术后心律失常、肺部并发症和AKI需要特殊的麻醉和手术护理,以防止ICU住院时间延长。

相似文献

2
[Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 23;44(6):577-580. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20200704-00626.
3
A comparison of short-term outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Dec;7(12):2352-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.12.15.
4
A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):204-211. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5660-4. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
6
Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Sep;42(3):430-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs031. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
7
Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;101(3):1097-103. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.062. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
10
Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.
Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):95-103. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182590603.

引用本文的文献

4
McKeown or Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Mar;9(3):1518-1527. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.01.45.
6
Reoperative Surgery After Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2021 Sep 9;32(1):60-65. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000996.
7
Risk factors and therapeutic measures for postoperative complications associated with esophagectomy.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 May 23;55:167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.05.011. eCollection 2020 Jul.

本文引用的文献

2
The surgical treatment of esophageal cancer in Sudan: A 100 consecutive cases.
Int J Surg. 2016 May;29:101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.023. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
3
Incidence and management of chylothorax after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 May;151(5):1398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.01.030. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
4
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
7
Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.
Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):95-103. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182590603.
9
Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000-2011.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 May;16(5):1055-63. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1731-3. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
10
The volume-outcome relation in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cancer. 2012 Apr 1;118(7):1754-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26383. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验