Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Eur Urol. 2018 Sep;74(3):253-256. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
Using institutional data, we have previously developed an algorithm to identify the optimal candidates for adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) among men with pN1 prostate cancer (PCa) at radical prostatectomy (RP). This study aimed to test the external validity of our previous findings using a nationwide database while focusing on overall mortality as an endpoint. To this end, we identified 5498 pN1 PCa patients who were treated with RP, pelvic lymph node dissection, and androgen deprivation therapy with or without aRT, within the National Cancer Database, between 2004 and 2015. Patients were divided into five groups based on our previously published algorithm. Similar to our previous report, multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that only two of these groups benefit from aRT: (1) those with one to two positive nodes, pathological Gleason score 7-10, and pT3b/4 disease or positive surgical margins (hazard ratio [HR]=0.75); and (2) those with three to four positive nodes, regardless of local tumor characteristics (HR=0.57, both p=0.01). In the remaining patients (25% of the cohort), aRT had no significant survival benefit. Results were confirmed on sensitivity analyses using 1:1 propensity score-matched cohorts, excluding men who died within 3 yr of surgery and using cut-off of 6 mo post-surgery to identify receipt of aRT. Our findings corroborate the validity of our previously published criteria and highlight the importance of patient selection in pN1 PCa patients who are considered for aRT.
利用机构数据,我们之前开发了一种算法,以识别接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)治疗的 pN1 前列腺癌(PCa)男性中辅助放疗(aRT)的最佳候选者。本研究旨在使用全国性数据库测试我们之前研究结果的外部有效性,同时将总死亡率作为终点。为此,我们在 2004 年至 2015 年间在国家癌症数据库中确定了 5498 名接受 RP、盆腔淋巴结清扫术和雄激素剥夺治疗(有或无 aRT)的 pN1 PCa 患者。根据我们之前发表的算法,将患者分为五组。与我们之前的报告相似,多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,只有两组患者从 aRT 中获益:(1)有 1-2 个阳性淋巴结、病理 Gleason 评分 7-10、pT3b/4 疾病或阳性切缘的患者(风险比 [HR]=0.75);(2)有 3-4 个阳性淋巴结的患者,无论局部肿瘤特征如何(HR=0.57,两者均为 p=0.01)。在其余患者(队列的 25%)中,aRT 并没有显著的生存获益。使用 1:1 倾向评分匹配队列进行敏感性分析以及排除术后 3 年内死亡的患者和使用术后 6 个月的截止值来识别 aRT 的使用,结果得到了证实。我们的研究结果证实了我们之前发表的标准的有效性,并强调了在考虑接受 aRT 的 pN1 PCa 患者中进行患者选择的重要性。