Hildebrandt J, Franz C E, Choroba-Mehnen B, Temme M
Pain Clinic, Institute of Anesthesiology, University of Göttingen.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Jun;13(6):681-5.
The pain drawings of 54 low-back-pain patients were examined to find out if it is possible to use them as a brief screening test in order to assess the psychological impairment of the patients. We were using the scoring system of Ransford et al, which we slightly changed, and chose as a criterion variable the ERMSS (Erweiterte Revidierte Mehrdimensionale Schmerzskala) of Cziske. This test originates in the McGill Pain Questionnaire of Melzack and Torgerson; its scales describe four dimensions of pain perception: pain intensity, the sensory-discriminative dimension reflecting the somatic aspect of pain; the affective-motivational dimension, and the total number of words, both representing the psychological involvement of a pain patient. A correlation was found between pain drawing score and the sensory-discriminative dimension of pain perception, whereas there was no such correlation between drawing score and the affective dimension. These results indicate that the pain drawing score might not be a sufficiently valid instrument for assessing psychological disturbances in pain patients to allow it to be used for individual diagnosis without hesitation.
对54名腰痛患者的疼痛绘图进行了检查,以确定是否有可能将其用作一种简短的筛查测试,从而评估患者的心理损伤。我们采用了兰斯福德等人的评分系统,并对其稍作修改,选择齐斯克的扩展修订多维疼痛量表(ERMSS)作为标准变量。该测试源自梅尔扎克和托格森的麦吉尔疼痛问卷;其量表描述了疼痛感知的四个维度:疼痛强度,反映疼痛躯体方面的感觉辨别维度;情感动机维度,以及单词总数,这两个维度都代表疼痛患者的心理参与程度。研究发现疼痛绘图得分与疼痛感知的感觉辨别维度之间存在相关性,而绘图得分与情感维度之间不存在这种相关性。这些结果表明,疼痛绘图得分可能不是评估疼痛患者心理障碍的充分有效工具,不能毫不犹豫地将其用于个体诊断。