Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, The Park Centre for Mental Health, Wacol, Queensland, Australia.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2019 Mar;89(1):75-94. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12223. Epub 2018 May 3.
Intervention on adolescent bullying is reliant on valid and reliable measurement of victimization and perpetration experiences across different behavioural expressions.
This study developed and validated a survey tool that integrates measurement of both traditional and cyber bullying to test a theoretically driven multi-dimensional model.
Adolescents from 10 mainstream secondary schools completed a baseline and follow-up survey (N = 1,217; M = 14 years; 66.2% male).
The Bullying and cyberbullying Scale for Adolescents (BCS-A) developed for this study comprised parallel victimization and perpetration subscales, each with 20 items. Additional measures of bullying (Olweus Global Bullying and the Forms of Bullying Scale [FBS]), as well as measures of internalizing and externalizing problems, school connectedness, social support, and personality, were used to further assess validity.
Factor structure was determined, and then, the suitability of items was assessed according to the following criteria: (1) factor interpretability, (2) item correlations, (3) model parsimony, and (4) measurement equivalence across victimization and perpetration experiences. The final models comprised four factors: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. The final scale was revised to two 13-item subscales. The BCS-A demonstrated acceptable concurrent and convergent validity (internalizing and externalizing problems, school connectedness, social support, and personality), as well as predictive validity over 6 months.
The BCS-A has sound psychometric properties. This tool establishes measurement equivalence across types of involvement and behavioural forms common among adolescents. An improved measurement method could add greater rigour to the evaluation of intervention programmes and also enable interventions to be tailored to subscale profiles.
干预青少年欺凌行为依赖于对不同行为表现的受害和施害经历进行有效且可靠的测量。
本研究开发并验证了一种调查工具,该工具整合了对传统欺凌和网络欺凌的测量,以测试一个基于理论的多维模型。
来自 10 所主流中学的青少年完成了基线和随访调查(N=1217;M=14 岁;66.2%为男性)。
本研究开发的青少年欺凌和网络欺凌量表(BCS-A)包括平行的受害和施害分量表,每个分量表各有 20 个项目。此外,还使用了其他的欺凌测量工具(Olweus 全球欺凌量表和欺凌形式量表[FBS]),以及用于进一步评估有效性的内化和外化问题、学校联系、社会支持和人格测量。
确定了因子结构,然后根据以下标准评估项目的适宜性:(1)因子可解释性,(2)项目相关性,(3)模型简约性,以及(4)受害和施害经历的测量等效性。最终模型包括四个因子:身体、言语、关系和网络。最终量表修订为两个 13 项分量表。BCS-A 表现出可接受的同时和收敛效度(内化和外化问题、学校联系、社会支持和人格),以及 6 个月的预测效度。
BCS-A 具有良好的心理测量学特性。该工具在青少年中常见的各种参与类型和行为形式之间建立了测量等效性。改进的测量方法可以为干预计划的评估增加更多的严谨性,也可以使干预措施能够根据子量表的特征进行定制。