• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多少次网络欺凌?一种针对攻击性网络行为的非单一视角。

How many cyberbullying(s)? A non-unitary perspective for offensive online behaviours.

机构信息

Department of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 19;17(7):e0268838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268838. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0268838
PMID:35853008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9295961/
Abstract

Research has usually considered cyberbullying as a unitary phenomenon. Thus, it has been neglected to explore whether the specific online aggressive behaviours relate differentially to demographic features of the perpetrators of online aggressive actions, their personality characteristics, or to the ways in which they interact with the Internet. To bridge this gap, a study was conducted through a questionnaire administered online to 1228 Italian high-school students (Female: 61.1%; 14-15 yo: 48.%; 16-17 yo: 29.1%; 18-20 yo: 20.4%, 21-25 yo: 1.6%; Northern Italy: 4.1%; Central Italy: 59.2%; Southern Italy: 36.4%). The questionnaire, in addition to items about the use of social media, mechanisms of Moral Disengagement and personality characteristics of the participants in the study, also included a scale for the measurement of cyberbullying through the reference to six aggressive behaviours. The results indicate that cyberbullying can be considered as a non-unitary phenomenon in which the different aggressive behaviours can be related to different individual characteristics such as gender, personality traits and the different ways of interacting with social media. Moreover, the existence of two components of cyberbullying has been highlighted, one related to virtual offensive actions directly aimed at a victim, the other to indirect actions, more likely conducted involving bystanders. These findings open important perspectives for understanding, preventing, and mitigating cyberbullying among adolescents.

摘要

研究通常将网络欺凌视为一种单一现象。因此,人们忽视了探索特定的网络攻击行为是否与网络攻击行为实施者的人口统计学特征、个性特征或他们与互联网互动的方式有关。为了弥补这一空白,通过在线问卷对 1228 名意大利高中生进行了一项研究(女生:61.1%;14-15 岁:48%;16-17 岁:29.1%;18-20 岁:20.4%,21-25 岁:1.6%;意大利北部:4.1%;意大利中部:59.2%;意大利南部:36.4%)。该问卷除了包含社交媒体使用、道德脱离机制和研究参与者个性特征的项目外,还包括一个通过参考六种攻击行为来衡量网络欺凌的量表。研究结果表明,网络欺凌可以被视为一种非单一现象,其中不同的攻击行为可能与不同的个体特征有关,如性别、个性特征和与社交媒体的不同互动方式。此外,还强调了网络欺凌存在两个组成部分,一个与直接针对受害者的虚拟攻击性行为有关,另一个与更可能涉及旁观者的间接行为有关。这些发现为理解、预防和减轻青少年网络欺凌现象提供了重要视角。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f4d/9295961/87af2f1e06b0/pone.0268838.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f4d/9295961/813023f9ef62/pone.0268838.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f4d/9295961/87af2f1e06b0/pone.0268838.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f4d/9295961/813023f9ef62/pone.0268838.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f4d/9295961/87af2f1e06b0/pone.0268838.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
How many cyberbullying(s)? A non-unitary perspective for offensive online behaviours.多少次网络欺凌?一种针对攻击性网络行为的非单一视角。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 19;17(7):e0268838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268838. eCollection 2022.
2
Offensive acts and helping behavior on the internet: An analysis of the relationships between moral disengagement, empathy and use of social media in a sample of Italian students.网络上的攻击行为与帮助行为:对意大利学生样本中道德推脱、同理心与社交媒体使用之间关系的分析。
Work. 2019;63(3):469-477. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192935.
3
Bullying and Cyberbullying among Italian Adolescents: The Influence of Psychosocial Factors on Violent Behaviours.意大利青少年中的欺凌和网络欺凌:心理社会因素对暴力行为的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 6;18(4):1558. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041558.
4
Cyberbullies, the Cyberbullied, and Problematic Internet Use: Some Reasonable Similarities.网络欺凌者、受网络欺凌者和问题性互联网使用:一些合理的相似之处。
Psicothema. 2021 May;33(2):198-205. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2020.209.
5
Cyberbullying Victimization in WhatsApp Classmate Groups among Israeli Elementary, Middle, and High School Students.以色列中小学生在 WhatsApp 同学群中遭受网络欺凌的情况。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Aug;36(15-16):NP8498-NP8519. doi: 10.1177/0886260519842860. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
6
Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine "helping," "joining in," and "doing nothing" when witnessing cyberbullying.在目睹网络欺凌时决定“施以援手”、“参与其中”和“不作为”的个人特征及情境因素。
Aggress Behav. 2014 Sep-Oct;40(5):383-96. doi: 10.1002/ab.21534. Epub 2014 May 16.
7
The role of family and school-level factors in bullying and cyberbullying: a cross-sectional study.家庭和学校层面因素在欺凌及网络欺凌中的作用:一项横断面研究
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0907-8.
8
[Cyber-bullying in adolescents: associated psychosocial problems and comparison with school bullying].青少年网络欺凌:相关的心理社会问题及与校园欺凌的比较
Encephale. 2013 Apr;39(2):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 May 28.
9
Moral Disengagement, Empathy, and Cybervictim's Representation as Predictive Factors of Cyberbullying among Italian Adolescents.道德脱离、同理心和网络受害者形象作为意大利青少年网络欺凌的预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 31;18(3):1266. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031266.
10
[A cyberbullying study: Analysis of cyberbullying, comorbidities and coping mechanisms].[一项网络欺凌研究:网络欺凌、共病情况及应对机制分析]
Encephale. 2015 Sep;41(4):287-94. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Exclusion and Online Aggressive Behavior: Mediation Through Ego Depletion and Moderation Through Mindfulness.社会排斥与网络攻击行为:通过自我损耗的中介作用和正念的调节作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 11;15(3):346. doi: 10.3390/bs15030346.

本文引用的文献

1
Theoretically Predicting Cyberbullying Perpetration in Youth With the BGCM: Unique Challenges and Promising Research Opportunities.运用BGCM理论预测青少年网络欺凌行为:独特挑战与前景广阔的研究机遇
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 29;12:708277. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708277. eCollection 2021.
2
Study of Cyberbullying among Adolescents in Recent Years: A Bibliometric Analysis.近年来青少年网络欺凌现象的研究:文献计量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 15;18(6):3016. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063016.
3
Cyberbullying Among Adolescents and Children: A Comprehensive Review of the Global Situation, Risk Factors, and Preventive Measures.
青少年和儿童中的网络欺凌:全球现状、风险因素和预防措施的全面综述。
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 11;9:634909. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.634909. eCollection 2021.
4
Personality Traits and Aggression as Explanatory Variables of Cyberbullying in Spanish Preadolescents.人格特质和攻击性作为西班牙青春期前儿童网络欺凌的解释变量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 7;17(16):5705. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165705.
5
Classroom Status Hierarchy Moderates the Association between Social Dominance Goals and Bullying Behavior in Middle Childhood and Early Adolescence.课堂地位层级调节了社会支配目标与中童年和青春期早期欺凌行为之间的关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Nov;49(11):2285-2297. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01285-z. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Mapping online hate: A scientometric analysis on research trends and hotspots in research on online hate.绘制网络仇恨图谱:网络仇恨研究趋势与热点的科学计量分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 26;14(9):e0222194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222194. eCollection 2019.
7
Young, Bullying, and Connected. Common Pathways to Cyberbullying and Problematic Internet Use in Adolescence.年轻、受欺凌与社交联系。青少年网络欺凌和问题性互联网使用的共同途径。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 4;10:1467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01467. eCollection 2019.
8
Offensive acts and helping behavior on the internet: An analysis of the relationships between moral disengagement, empathy and use of social media in a sample of Italian students.网络上的攻击行为与帮助行为:对意大利学生样本中道德推脱、同理心与社交媒体使用之间关系的分析。
Work. 2019;63(3):469-477. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192935.
9
Motives Behind Cyberbullying Perpetration: A Test of Uses and Gratifications Theory.网络欺凌行为的动机:使用与满足理论的检验。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jul;36(13-14):NP6699-NP6724. doi: 10.1177/0886260518819882. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
10
Using a Polygraph System for Evaluation of the Social Desirability Response Bias in Self-Report Measures of Aggression.使用测谎系统评估自我报告攻击性测量中的社会期望反应偏差。
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2018 Dec;43(4):309-318. doi: 10.1007/s10484-018-9414-4.