• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年护理工作者之间的合作:障碍、促进因素和支持过程。

Collaboration among eldercare workers: barriers, facilitators and supporting processes.

作者信息

Jakobsen Louise M, Albertsen Karen, Jorgensen Anette F B, Greiner Birgit A, Rugulies Reiner

机构信息

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.

TeamArbejdsliv, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Sep;32(3):1127-1137. doi: 10.1111/scs.12558. Epub 2018 May 3.

DOI:10.1111/scs.12558
PMID:29726033
Abstract

To retain qualified care workers and to ensure high-quality care for residents in eldercare homes, well-functioning collaboration among care workers is pivotal. This study aims to identify barriers and facilitators of collaboration among eldercare workers and to describe the processes leading to well-functioning collaboration. We collected focus group data from 33 eldercare workers from seven Danish eldercare homes. We found that collaboration was hampered by a number of formal and informal divisions among care workers. To ensure well-functioning collaboration, social and professional relations among care workers needed to be dealt with actively by care workers and by managers. The analysis showed that managers are essential for creating a well-functioning framework around the collaboration between care workers by providing guidelines and procedures for working across various divisions, by being attentive to care workers and taking decisive action when needed and by dealing with conflicts in the workgroups.

摘要

为了留住合格的护理人员,并确保养老院居民获得高质量的护理,护理人员之间良好的协作至关重要。本研究旨在确定老年护理人员之间协作的障碍和促进因素,并描述实现良好协作的过程。我们从丹麦七家养老院的33名老年护理人员那里收集了焦点小组数据。我们发现,护理人员之间的一些正式和非正式划分阻碍了协作。为了确保良好的协作,护理人员和管理人员需要积极处理护理人员之间的社会和专业关系。分析表明,管理人员对于围绕护理人员之间的协作创建一个良好运作的框架至关重要,这包括提供跨部门工作的指导方针和程序,关注护理人员并在需要时采取果断行动,以及处理工作小组中的冲突。

相似文献

1
Collaboration among eldercare workers: barriers, facilitators and supporting processes.老年护理工作者之间的合作:障碍、促进因素和支持过程。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Sep;32(3):1127-1137. doi: 10.1111/scs.12558. Epub 2018 May 3.
2
A multilevel study on the association of observer-assessed working conditions with depressive symptoms among female eldercare workers from 56 work units in 10 care homes in Denmark.一项关于丹麦10家养老院中56个工作单位的女性老年护理工作者的观察评估工作条件与抑郁症状之间关联的多层次研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 11;5(11):e008713. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008713.
3
Facilitators and barriers for using outdoor areas in the primary work tasks of eldercare workers in nursing homes.促进和阻碍养老院护理员在主要工作任务中使用户外区域的因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 24;23(1):1300. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10308-x.
4
Betwixt and between: workplace perspectives on work reintegration in the eldercare sector in Denmark.介于两者之间:丹麦老年护理行业对重返工作岗位的职场观点。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1839-48. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.982831. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
5
Emotion work within eldercare and depressive symptoms: A cross-sectional multi-level study assessing the association between externally observed emotion work and self-reported depressive symptoms among Danish eldercare workers.老年护理中的情感劳动与抑郁症状:一项横断面多层次研究,评估丹麦老年护理工作者中外部观察到的情感劳动与自我报告的抑郁症状之间的关联。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Oct;62:183-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
6
Care workers' abusive behavior to residents in care homes: a qualitative study of types of abuse, barriers, and facilitators to good care and development of an instrument for reporting of abuse anonymously.护理人员在养老院对居民的虐待行为:对虐待类型、良好护理的障碍和促进因素的定性研究,以及开发一种匿名报告虐待的工具。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 May;25(5):733-41. doi: 10.1017/S104161021200227X. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
7
Varying viewpoints of Belgian stakeholders on models of interhospital collaboration.比利时利益相关者对医院间协作模式的不同观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):942. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3763-9.
8
Successful collaboration in dementia care from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and informal carers in Germany: results from a focus group study.德国医疗保健专业人员和非正式护理人员视角下痴呆症护理的成功协作:焦点小组研究结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 May 28;15:208. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0875-3.
9
"Sometimes I've gone home feeling that my voice hasn't been heard": a focus group study exploring the views and experiences of health care assistants when caring for dying residents.“有时我回家时会觉得自己的声音没人听到”:一项焦点小组研究,探讨医疗护理员在照顾临终居民时的观点和经历。
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Aug 19;15(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0150-3.
10
Eldercare work, migrant care workers, affective care and subjective proximity.老年护理工作、流动护理人员、情感关怀与主观亲近感
Ethn Health. 2016 Aug;21(4):379-96. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2015.1045407. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Digitally-mediated coordination in healthcare: the effects of teleconsultation on doctor-to-doctor relational coordination.医疗保健中的数字化协调:远程咨询对医生间关系协调的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 28;24(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10726-5.
2
Ward-level leadership quality and prospective low-back pain of eldercare workers: do resident handlings mediate the association?护层级领导素质与老年护理员的预期下腰痛:居民处理是否在关联中起中介作用?
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023 Sep;96(7):1049-1059. doi: 10.1007/s00420-023-01989-2. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
3
Eldercare's Turnover Intention and Human Resource Approach: A Systematic Review.
老年护理人员离职意愿与人力资源管理措施:系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;20(5):3932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053932.
4
Healthcare professionals' experiences and attitudes to care coordination across health sectors: an interview study.医疗保健专业人员在跨卫生部门协调照护方面的经验和态度:一项访谈研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03200-6.
5
Antecedents and Contextual Factors Affecting Occupational Turnover among Registered Nurses in Public Hospitals in Hong Kong: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.影响香港公立医院注册护士职业流动的前因和情境因素:一项定性描述性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 28;17(11):3834. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113834.