Stephan Astrid, Möhler Ralph, Renom-Guiteras Anna, Meyer Gabriele
Faculty of Health, School of Nursing Science, Witten/Herdecke University, Stockumer Straße 12, 58453, Witten, Germany.
Medical Faculty, Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 May 28;15:208. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0875-3.
Informal carers of persons with dementia are in contact with numerous healthcare professionals (HCP) in a complex healthcare system. Successful collaboration between the parties involved appears to be essential for good dementia care. Thus, we investigated the perceptions of both HCP and informal carers regarding successful collaboration and sought to describe obstacles and facilitators.
As part of the 7(th) framework EU project RightTimePlaceCare, five focus groups were conducted with HCP and informal carers of persons with dementia in Germany (n = 30 participants/ time: Oct/Nov 2011). A supplementary secondary data analysis was performed, applying qualitative content analysis with open coding.
The derived categories were sorted into three overarching themes: collaboration between HCP and informal carers, collaboration among HCP and the impact of resources and healthcare system. HCP and informal carers largely agree on what facilitates or impedes successful collaboration between them. Making the initial contact appears to be a major challenge. While HCP expect to be contacted, informal carers hesitate to seek assistance, primarily due to inner barriers. Permanent contact person/institution, well-trained, empathetic HCP who can establish a trustful relationship are regarded as facilitating collaboration. The relational perspective is more clearly emphasised by HCP than by informal carers. This may be attributed to the absence of a permanent contact person in Germany. Sufficient information relay, clear responsibilities, motivation and defined aims, and a personal relationship between professionals are mentioned as facilitators. External factors, such as rapid staff turnover, insufficient time resources and conditions specified by the health and long-term care system causing financial competition between providers, are described as general barriers to successful collaboration.
HCP and informal carers had comparable perceptions of successful collaboration among them. The initial contact seems to be particularly challenging. Better strategies are urgently needed to facilitate the access to professional support. A permanent contact person (e.g., a case manager) might improve collaboration among all the parties involved, but this is not available regularly. Constraints created by the healthcare system may considerably hinder successful collaboration.
在复杂的医疗体系中,痴呆症患者的非正式照护者会与众多医疗保健专业人员(HCP)接触。相关各方之间的成功协作对于良好的痴呆症护理似乎至关重要。因此,我们调查了医疗保健专业人员和非正式照护者对成功协作的看法,并试图描述其中的障碍和促进因素。
作为欧盟第七框架项目“RightTimePlaceCare”的一部分,在德国对医疗保健专业人员和痴呆症患者的非正式照护者进行了五次焦点小组讨论(每次n = 30名参与者:2011年10月/11月)。进行了补充性二次数据分析,采用开放式编码的定性内容分析方法。
得出的类别分为三个总体主题:医疗保健专业人员与非正式照护者之间的协作、医疗保健专业人员之间的协作以及资源和医疗体系的影响。医疗保健专业人员和非正式照护者在促进或阻碍他们之间成功协作的因素方面基本达成一致。进行初次接触似乎是一项重大挑战。虽然医疗保健专业人员期望得到联系,但非正式照护者在寻求帮助时会犹豫不决,主要是由于内心的障碍。被视为促进协作的因素包括有固定的联系人/机构、训练有素且富有同理心的医疗保健专业人员,他们能够建立信任关系。与非正式照护者相比,医疗保健专业人员更强调关系视角。这可能归因于德国缺乏固定的联系人。信息传递充分、责任明确、有积极性和明确目标以及专业人员之间的个人关系也被提及为促进因素。外部因素,如人员快速更替、时间资源不足以及健康和长期护理体系规定的条件导致提供者之间的财务竞争,被描述为成功协作的一般障碍。
医疗保健专业人员和非正式照护者对他们之间的成功协作有类似的看法。初次接触似乎特别具有挑战性。迫切需要更好的策略来促进获得专业支持。一个固定的联系人(如个案经理)可能会改善所有相关方之间的协作,但这种情况并不常见。医疗体系造成的限制可能会严重阻碍成功协作。