• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用特定药物治疗工具改善重症监护病房临床药师的交接班流程:I-HAPPY研究

Improving the Clinical Pharmacist Handover Process in the Intensive Care Unit with a Pharmacotherapy-Specific Tool: The I-HAPPY Study.

作者信息

Attfield Emma, Swankhuizen Matthew P, Bruchet Nicole, Slavik Richard, Gorman Sean K

机构信息

, BSc(Pharm), ACPR, is with Fraser Health Pharmacy Services, Surrey, British Columbia.

, BSc(Pharm), PharmD, is with Kootenay Boundary Regional Hospital, Interior Health Pharmacy Services, Trail, British Columbia, and the Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.

出版信息

Can J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Mar-Apr;71(2):111-118. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

PMID:29736044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5931070/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pharmacists in the intensive care unit (ICU) provide pharmaceutical care to critically ill patients. Identification and resolution of drug therapy problems improves outcomes for these patients. To maintain continuity of care, pharmacotherapy plans should be transferred to a receiving pharmacist upon discharge of patients from the ICU. No previous studies have addressed the development or evaluation of a systematic, standardized clinical handover tool and process for pharmacists.

OBJECTIVES

To assess pharmacists' satisfaction with and utilization of a pharmacotherapy-specific handover tool and process.

METHODS

Plan-do-study-act methodology was employed to develop a clinical handover tool and process, which were implemented in a Canadian health authority. For evaluation of the tool and process, a multicentre, online survey questionnaire was distributed to 14 clinical pharmacists in the ICU and ward settings at 5 hospitals between February 15 and April 22, 2016.

RESULTS

Thirteen of the pharmacists completed the survey. All 13 pharmacists (100%) were satisfied with usability; 12 (92%) were satisfied with training, organization, and accuracy of the process; and 11 (85%) were satisfied with completeness and efficiency. Most pharmacists conducted 1 or 2 handovers per week, with each having a duration of 3-5 min. Seven (54%) of the respondents reported that they communicated handovers mostly or exclusively by telephone, and 6 (46%) reported using mostly or exclusively face-to-face communication. However, 6 (46%) reported a preference for face-to-face communication, and 3 (23%) reported a preference for the telephone; the remaining 4 (31%) had no preference for mode of communication.

CONCLUSIONS

Respondents were highly satisfied with the handover tool and process. ICU pharmacists appeared more satisfied with the training, organization, and completeness of handover, whereas ward pharmacists appeared more satisfied with the accuracy and efficiency of handover. Workload requirements were minimal, and face-to-face interaction, although slightly less well utilized than the telephone, was the preferred method of communication.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房(ICU)的药剂师为重症患者提供药学服务。识别并解决药物治疗问题可改善这些患者的治疗结局。为维持护理的连续性,患者从ICU出院时,药物治疗计划应交接给接收药剂师。此前尚无研究涉及针对药剂师的系统性、标准化临床交接工具及流程的开发或评估。

目的

评估药剂师对药物治疗特定交接工具及流程的满意度和使用情况。

方法

采用计划-实施-研究-改进方法开发临床交接工具及流程,并在加拿大某卫生部门实施。为评估该工具及流程,于2016年2月15日至4月22日向5家医院的ICU及病房的14名临床药剂师发放了多中心在线调查问卷。

结果

13名药剂师完成了调查。所有13名药剂师(100%)对可用性感到满意;12名(92%)对流程的培训、组织及准确性感到满意;11名(85%)对完整性和效率感到满意。大多数药剂师每周进行1或2次交接,每次时长3至5分钟。7名(54%)受访者表示他们主要或仅通过电话进行交接沟通,6名(46%)表示主要或仅使用面对面沟通。然而,6名(46%)表示更喜欢面对面沟通,3名(23%)表示更喜欢电话沟通;其余4名(31%)对沟通方式无偏好。

结论

受访者对交接工具及流程高度满意。ICU药剂师似乎对交接的培训、组织及完整性更满意,而病房药剂师似乎对交接的准确性和效率更满意。工作量要求最低,面对面交流虽比电话使用略少,但仍是首选的沟通方式。

相似文献

1
Improving the Clinical Pharmacist Handover Process in the Intensive Care Unit with a Pharmacotherapy-Specific Tool: The I-HAPPY Study.使用特定药物治疗工具改善重症监护病房临床药师的交接班流程:I-HAPPY研究
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Mar-Apr;71(2):111-118. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
2
Differences in the handover process and perception between nurses and residents in a critical care setting.重症监护环境中护士与住院医师之间在交接班过程和认知上的差异。
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Mar;24(5-6):778-85. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12707. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
3
Handover practices of nurses transferring trauma patients from intensive care units to the ward: A multimethod observational study.护士将创伤患者从重症监护病房转至病房时的交接实践:一项多方法观察性研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2020 Nov;33(6):538-545. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 May 12.
4
Lost in relocation: longitudinal surveys evaluating the effectiveness of ICU to ward handover after the introduction of an electronic patient record.在重新安置中迷失:纵向调查评估引入电子病历后 ICU 到病房交接的效果。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2022 Oct;50(4):267-272. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2022.2102778. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
5
Nursing handover from ICU to cardiac ward: Standardised tools to reduce safety risks.从重症监护病房到心脏科病房的护理交接:降低安全风险的标准化工具。
Aust Crit Care. 2016 Aug;29(3):165-71. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
6
An exploration of the handover process of critically ill patients between nursing staff from the emergency department and the intensive care unit.急诊科与重症监护病房护理人员之间危重症患者交接过程的探索。
Nurs Crit Care. 2007 Nov-Dec;12(6):261-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2007.00244.x.
7
Handover from operating theatre to the intensive care unit: A quality improvement study.手术间向重症监护病房的交接:一项质量改进研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2019 May;32(3):229-236. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
8
Completeness of the operating room to intensive care unit handover: a matter of time?手术室到重症监护病房交接的完整性:时间问题?
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Feb 5;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01247-3.
9
A Multidisciplinary QI Initiative to Improve OR-ICU Handovers.一项旨在改善手术室与重症监护病房交接的多学科质量改进计划。
Am J Nurs. 2018 Feb;118(2):48-59. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000530248.45711.60.
10
Virtual Handover of Patients in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit During the Covid-19 Crisis.新冠疫情危机期间儿科重症监护病房患者的虚拟交接
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Jun 25;14:1571-1581. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S310028. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Shift-to-Shift Handoff Research: Where Do We Go From Here?轮班交接研究:我们从这里走向何方?
J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Mar;4(1):4-8. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-11-00308.1.
2
How critical are critical care pharmacists?重症监护药剂师有多重要?
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2012 Jan;65(1):5-6. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v65i1.1095.
3
Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals.系统评价影响医疗保健专业人员采用信息和通信技术的因素。
J Med Syst. 2012 Feb;36(1):241-77. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
4
Implementation of a pharmacist-initiated pharmaceutical handover for oncology and haematology patients being transferred to critical care units.开展药师主导的针对转入重症监护病房的肿瘤和血液科患者的药学交接。
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Jul;18(7):811-6. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0713-4. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
5
An experimental comparison of handover methods.交接方法的实验比较。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 Apr;89(3):298-300. doi: 10.1308/003588407X168352.
6
Intensive care unit length of stay: Benchmarking based on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV.重症监护病房住院时长:基于急性生理与慢性健康状况评估系统(APACHE)IV的基准分析
Crit Care Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):2517-29. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000240233.01711.D9.
7
Lost in translation: challenges and opportunities in physician-to-physician communication during patient handoffs.翻译中的迷失:患者交接过程中医师间沟通的挑战与机遇
Acad Med. 2005 Dec;80(12):1094-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200512000-00005.
8
Position paper on critical care pharmacy services. Society of Critical Care Medicine and American College of Clinical Pharmacy Task Force on Critical Care Pharmacy Services.关于重症监护药学服务的立场文件。危重病医学会和美国临床药学院重症监护药学服务特别工作组。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Nov;28(11):3746-50. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200011000-00037.