• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cluster-Randomized Test-Negative Design Trials: A Novel and Efficient Method to Assess the Efficacy of Community-Level Dengue Interventions.整群随机对照试验阴性设计:评估社区层面登革热干预措施效果的一种新颖而有效的方法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Sep 1;187(9):2021-2028. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy099.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The AWED trial (Applying Wolbachia to Eliminate Dengue) to assess the efficacy of Wolbachia-infected mosquito deployments to reduce dengue incidence in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.AWED试验(应用沃尔巴克氏体消除登革热):评估投放感染沃尔巴克氏体的蚊子以降低印度尼西亚日惹登革热发病率的效果——一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 May 31;19(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2670-z.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Assessing the efficacy of male Wolbachia-infected mosquito deployments to reduce dengue incidence in Singapore: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.评估雄性沃尔巴克氏体感染蚊子的部署在减少新加坡登革热发病率方面的效果:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Dec 17;23(1):1023. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06976-5.
6
Determining the efficacy of guppies and pyriproxyfen (Sumilarv® 2MR) combined with community engagement on dengue vectors in Cambodia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.确定孔雀鱼和吡丙醚(Sumilarv® 2MR)联合社区参与对柬埔寨登革热媒介的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Aug 4;18(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2105-2.
7
Assessing dengue transmission risk and a vector control intervention using entomological and immunological indices in Thailand: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.利用昆虫学和免疫学指标评估泰国登革热传播风险及病媒控制干预措施:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Feb 20;19(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2490-1.
8
EVITA Dengue: a cluster-randomized controlled trial to EValuate the efficacy of Wolbachia-InfecTed Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in reducing the incidence of Arboviral infection in Brazil.EVITA 登革热:一项评价感染沃尔巴克氏体的埃及伊蚊减少巴西虫媒病毒感染发病率的效果的整群随机对照试验
Trials. 2022 Mar 2;23(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-05997-4.
9
Sustainable, healthy cities: protocol of a mixed methods evaluation of a cluster randomized controlled trial for Aedes control in Brazil using a community mobilization approach.可持续、健康的城市:采用社区动员方法对巴西使用蚊虫控制的群组随机对照试验进行混合方法评估的方案。
Trials. 2020 Feb 14;21(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3714-8.
10
The validity of test-negative design for assessment of typhoid conjugate vaccine protection: comparison of estimates by different study designs using data from a cluster-randomised controlled trial.用于评估伤寒结合疫苗保护效果的检测阴性设计的有效性:使用来自一项整群随机对照试验的数据,比较不同研究设计的估计值
Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Jun;13(6):e1122-e1131. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00056-7. Epub 2025 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
RANDOMIZATION INFERENCE FOR CLUSTER-RANDOMIZED TEST-NEGATIVE DESIGNS WITH APPLICATION TO DENGUE STUDIES: UNBIASED ESTIMATION, PARTIAL COMPLIANCE, AND STEPPED-WEDGE DESIGN.用于登革热研究的整群随机试验阴性设计的随机化推断:无偏估计、部分依从性和阶梯楔形设计
Ann Appl Stat. 2023 Jun;17(2):1592-1614. doi: 10.1214/22-aoas1684. Epub 2023 May 1.
2
Spatiotemporal effects on dengue incidence based on a large cluster randomized study.基于一项大型整群随机研究的登革热发病率的时空效应
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Jul;34(7):1303-1313. doi: 10.1177/09622802251338371. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
3
The validity of test-negative design for assessment of typhoid conjugate vaccine protection: comparison of estimates by different study designs using data from a cluster-randomised controlled trial.用于评估伤寒结合疫苗保护效果的检测阴性设计的有效性:使用来自一项整群随机对照试验的数据,比较不同研究设计的估计值
Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Jun;13(6):e1122-e1131. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00056-7. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
4
Assessing Wolbachia-mediated sterility for dengue control: emulation of a cluster-randomized target trial in Singapore.评估沃尔巴克氏体介导的绝育控制登革热:在新加坡模拟一项集群随机对照目标试验。
J Travel Med. 2024 Oct 19;31(7). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taae103.
5
Hypothesis testing and sample size considerations for the test-negative design.假设检验和阴性设计的样本量考虑。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jul 16;24(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02277-4.
6
Considerations for first field trials of low-threshold gene drive for malaria vector control.考虑首次野外试验的低门槛基因驱动疟疾媒介控制。
Malar J. 2024 May 22;23(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-04952-9.
7
Hypothesis testing and sample size considerations for the test-negative design.检验阴性设计的假设检验与样本量考量
Res Sq. 2023 Dec 28:rs.3.rs-3783493. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3783493/v1.
8
Programmatic Effectiveness of a Pediatric Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine Campaign in Navi Mumbai, India.印度那瓦西瓦市小儿伤寒结合疫苗接种运动的规划效果。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jul 5;77(1):138-144. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad132.
9
Assessing the efficacy of male Wolbachia-infected mosquito deployments to reduce dengue incidence in Singapore: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.评估雄性沃尔巴克氏体感染蚊子的部署在减少新加坡登革热发病率方面的效果:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Dec 17;23(1):1023. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06976-5.
10
Efficacy of a spatial repellent for control of -borne virus transmission: A cluster-randomized trial in Iquitos, Peru.空间驱避剂控制 - 传播病毒的效果:秘鲁伊基托斯的一项集群随机试验。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jun 28;119(26):e2118283119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2118283119. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The AWED trial (Applying Wolbachia to Eliminate Dengue) to assess the efficacy of Wolbachia-infected mosquito deployments to reduce dengue incidence in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.AWED试验(应用沃尔巴克氏体消除登革热):评估投放感染沃尔巴克氏体的蚊子以降低印度尼西亚日惹登革热发病率的效果——一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 May 31;19(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2670-z.
2
Analysis of cluster-randomized test-negative designs: cluster-level methods.群组随机对照试验阴性设计分析:群组水平方法。
Biostatistics. 2019 Apr 1;20(2):332-346. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxy005.
3
The relationship between entomological indicators of Aedes aegypti abundance and dengue virus infection.埃及伊蚊数量的昆虫学指标与登革病毒感染之间的关系。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Mar 23;11(3):e0005429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005429. eCollection 2017 Mar.
4
Efficacy and effectiveness of an rVSV-vectored vaccine in preventing Ebola virus disease: final results from the Guinea ring vaccination, open-label, cluster-randomised trial (Ebola Ça Suffit!).一种重组水疱性口炎病毒载体疫苗预防埃博拉病毒病的有效性和效果:几内亚环状疫苗接种、开放标签、整群随机试验(埃博拉到此为止!)的最终结果
Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):505-518. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32621-6. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
5
A cleaner burning biomass-fuelled cookstove intervention to prevent pneumonia in children under 5 years old in rural Malawi (the Cooking and Pneumonia Study): a cluster randomised controlled trial.一项旨在预防马拉维农村地区5岁以下儿童肺炎的清洁燃烧生物质燃料炉灶干预措施(烹饪与肺炎研究):一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2017 Jan 14;389(10065):167-175. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32507-7. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
6
Effectiveness of 4% chlorhexidine umbilical cord care on neonatal mortality in Southern Province, Zambia (ZamCAT): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.赞比亚南方省 4%洗必泰脐带护理对新生儿死亡率的影响(ZamCAT):一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Nov;4(11):e827-e836. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30215-7. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
7
Invited Commentary: Beware the Test-Negative Design.特邀评论:警惕阴性对照设计。
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Sep 1;184(5):354-6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww063.
8
Theoretical Basis of the Test-Negative Study Design for Assessment of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness.用于评估流感疫苗效力的检测阴性研究设计的理论基础。
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Sep 1;184(5):345-53. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww064.
9
Symptomatic Dengue Disease in Five Southeast Asian Countries: Epidemiological Evidence from a Dengue Vaccine Trial.五个东南亚国家的有症状登革热疾病:来自一项登革热疫苗试验的流行病学证据
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Aug 17;10(8):e0004918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004918. eCollection 2016 Aug.
10
Observational studies and the difficult quest for causality: lessons from vaccine effectiveness and impact studies.观察性研究与对因果关系的艰难探索:疫苗有效性和影响研究的经验教训
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Dec 1;45(6):2060-2074. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw124.

整群随机对照试验阴性设计:评估社区层面登革热干预措施效果的一种新颖而有效的方法。

Cluster-Randomized Test-Negative Design Trials: A Novel and Efficient Method to Assess the Efficacy of Community-Level Dengue Interventions.

机构信息

Institute of Vector-Borne Disease, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Sep 1;187(9):2021-2028. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy099.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwy099
PMID:29741576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6118074/
Abstract

Cluster-randomized controlled trials are the gold standard for assessing efficacy of community-level interventions, such as vector-control strategies against dengue. We describe a novel cluster-randomized trial methodology with a test-negative design (CR-TND), which offers advantages over traditional approaches. This method uses outcome-based sampling of patients presenting with a syndrome consistent with the disease of interest, who are subsequently classified as test-positive cases or test-negative controls on the basis of diagnostic testing. We used simulations of a cluster trial to demonstrate validity of efficacy estimates under the test-negative approach. We demonstrated that, provided study arms are balanced for both test-negative and test-positive illness at baseline and that other test-negative design assumptions are met, the efficacy estimates closely match true efficacy. Analytical considerations for an odds ratio-based effect estimate arising from clustered data and potential approaches to analysis are also discussed briefly. We concluded that application of the test-negative design to certain cluster-randomized trials could increase their efficiency and ease of implementation.

摘要

整群随机对照试验是评估社区层面干预措施(如登革热病媒控制策略)效果的金标准。我们描述了一种新颖的整群随机试验方法,即基于阴性检测的设计(CR-TND),这种方法比传统方法具有优势。该方法基于与目标疾病一致的综合征,对出现综合征的患者进行基于结果的抽样,然后根据诊断检测将患者分类为阳性检测病例或阴性检测对照。我们使用集群试验模拟来证明阴性检测方法下疗效估计的有效性。我们证明,只要在基线时研究组在阴性和阳性疾病方面保持平衡,并且满足其他阴性检测设计假设,那么疗效估计就与真实疗效非常接近。我们还简要讨论了基于比值比的聚类数据效应估计的分析注意事项和潜在的分析方法。我们得出的结论是,将阴性检测设计应用于某些整群随机试验可以提高其效率和实施的便利性。