• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空间驱避剂控制 - 传播病毒的效果:秘鲁伊基托斯的一项集群随机试验。

Efficacy of a spatial repellent for control of -borne virus transmission: A cluster-randomized trial in Iquitos, Peru.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Department of Virology and Emerging Infectious Diseases, US Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Lima, Peru, Washington, DC 20521-3230.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jun 28;119(26):e2118283119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2118283119. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2118283119
PMID:35737833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9245620/
Abstract

Over half the world's population is at risk for viruses transmitted by mosquitoes, such as dengue and Zika. The primary vector, , thrives in urban environments. Despite decades of effort, cases and geographic range of -borne viruses (ABVs) continue to expand. Rigorously proven vector control interventions that measure protective efficacy against ABV diseases are limited to in a single trial in Indonesia and do not include any chemical intervention. Spatial repellents, a new option for efficient deployment, are designed to decrease human exposure to ABVs by releasing active ingredients into the air that disrupt mosquito-human contact. A parallel, cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in Iquitos, Peru, to quantify the impact of a transfluthrin-based spatial repellent on human ABV infection. From 2,907 households across 26 clusters (13 per arm), 1,578 participants were assessed for seroconversion (primary endpoint) by survival analysis. Incidence of acute disease was calculated among 16,683 participants (secondary endpoint). Adult mosquito collections were conducted to compare abundance, blood-fed rate, and parity status through mixed-effect difference-in-difference analyses. The spatial repellent significantly reduced ABV infection by 34.1% (one-sided 95% CI lower limit, 6.9%; one-sided value = 0.0236, z = 1.98). abundance and blood-fed rates were significantly reduced by 28.6 (95% CI 24.1%, ∞); z = -9.11) and 12.4% (95% CI 4.2%, ∞); = -2.43), respectively. Our trial provides conclusive statistical evidence from an appropriately powered, preplanned cluster-randomized controlled clinical trial of the impact of a chemical intervention, in this case a spatial repellent, to reduce the risk of ABV transmission compared to a placebo.

摘要

超过一半的世界人口面临着由蚊子传播的病毒的风险,例如登革热和寨卡病毒。主要媒介 ,在城市环境中茁壮成长。尽管经过几十年的努力, 病媒病毒(ABV)的病例和地理范围仍在继续扩大。经过严格验证的针对 ABV 疾病具有保护效果的媒介控制干预措施仅限于印度尼西亚的一项单一试验,并且不包括任何化学干预措施。空间驱避剂是一种新的高效部署选择,旨在通过向空气中释放活性成分来减少人类接触 ABV,从而降低人类感染 ABV 的风险。在秘鲁伊基托斯进行了一项平行的、基于集群的随机对照试验,以量化基于 Transfluthrin 的空间驱避剂对人类 ABV 感染的影响。在 26 个集群(每组 13 个)的 2907 个家庭中,对 1578 名参与者进行了生存分析评估,以确定血清转化率(主要终点)。在 16683 名参与者中计算了急性疾病的发病率(次要终点)。进行了成年蚊子采集,通过混合效应差分差异分析比较了 丰度、吸血率和生殖力状态。空间驱避剂显著降低了 34.1%的 ABV 感染率(单侧 95%置信区间下限,6.9%;单侧 值=0.0236,z=1.98)。 丰度和吸血率分别显著降低了 28.6%(95%置信区间 24.1%,∞);z=-9.11)和 12.4%(95%置信区间 4.2%,∞); =-2.43)。我们的试验提供了来自适当加权、预先计划的基于集群的随机对照临床试验的结论性统计证据,证明了化学干预措施(在这种情况下是空间驱避剂)的影响,与安慰剂相比,降低了 ABV 传播的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8175/9245620/f7725f1b384e/pnas.2118283119fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8175/9245620/bc854f836b99/pnas.2118283119fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8175/9245620/476b2e205e9e/pnas.2118283119fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8175/9245620/897ed42df3e6/pnas.2118283119fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8175/9245620/3746d4f66978/pnas.2118283119fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8175/9245620/f7725f1b384e/pnas.2118283119fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8175/9245620/bc854f836b99/pnas.2118283119fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8175/9245620/476b2e205e9e/pnas.2118283119fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8175/9245620/897ed42df3e6/pnas.2118283119fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8175/9245620/3746d4f66978/pnas.2118283119fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8175/9245620/f7725f1b384e/pnas.2118283119fig05.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of a spatial repellent for control of -borne virus transmission: A cluster-randomized trial in Iquitos, Peru.空间驱避剂控制 - 传播病毒的效果:秘鲁伊基托斯的一项集群随机试验。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jun 28;119(26):e2118283119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2118283119. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
2
A cluster-randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a spatial repellent (Mosquito Shield™) against Aedes-borne virus infection among children ≥ 4-16 years of age in the Gampaha District, Sri Lanka: study protocol (the AEGIS program).一项在斯里兰卡加姆波哈区评估空间驱避剂(防蚊盾)对 4 岁至 16 岁儿童感染伊蚊传播病毒的疗效的整群随机、安慰剂对照试验:研究方案(AEGIS 项目)。
Trials. 2023 Jan 4;24(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06998-z.
3
The TIRS trial: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of preventive targeted indoor residual spraying to reduce Aedes-borne viral illnesses in Merida, Mexico.TIRS 试验:评估在墨西哥梅里达采用预防性靶向室内滞留喷洒以减少基孔肯雅热和登革热等蚊媒病毒病的有效性的整群随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2020 Oct 8;21(1):839. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04780-7.
4
EVITA Dengue: a cluster-randomized controlled trial to EValuate the efficacy of Wolbachia-InfecTed Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in reducing the incidence of Arboviral infection in Brazil.EVITA 登革热:一项评价感染沃尔巴克氏体的埃及伊蚊减少巴西虫媒病毒感染发病率的效果的整群随机对照试验
Trials. 2022 Mar 2;23(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-05997-4.
5
The AWED trial (Applying Wolbachia to Eliminate Dengue) to assess the efficacy of Wolbachia-infected mosquito deployments to reduce dengue incidence in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.AWED试验(应用沃尔巴克氏体消除登革热):评估投放感染沃尔巴克氏体的蚊子以降低印度尼西亚日惹登革热发病率的效果——一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 May 31;19(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2670-z.
6
The impact of insecticide treated curtains on dengue virus transmission: A cluster randomized trial in Iquitos, Peru.杀虫剂处理过的窗帘对登革热病毒传播的影响:秘鲁伊基托斯的一项整群随机试验。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Apr 10;14(4):e0008097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008097. eCollection 2020 Apr.
7
Use of mobile data collection systems within large-scale epidemiological field trials: findings and lessons-learned from a vector control trial in Iquitos, Peru.在大规模流行病学现场试验中使用移动数据收集系统:来自秘鲁伊基托斯的一项病媒控制试验的发现和经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 15;22(1):1924. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14301-7.
8
Risk of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya transmission in the metropolitan area of Cucuta, Colombia: cross-sectional analysis, baseline for a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a novel vector tool for water containers.哥伦比亚库库塔大都市区登革热、寨卡和基孔肯雅热传播风险:横断面分析,新型水容器病媒控制工具群组随机对照试验的基线
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 30;23(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15893-4.
9
Model-based analysis of experimental data from interconnected, row-configured huts elucidates multifaceted effects of a volatile chemical on Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.基于模型的分析方法可用于研究相互连接的、行式布局的小屋中的实验数据,从而阐明挥发性化学物质对埃及伊蚊的多方面影响。
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Jun 26;11(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2919-0.
10
Natural Aedes-Borne Virus Infection Detected in Male Adult Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Collected From Urban Settings in Mérida, Yucatán, México.在墨西哥尤卡坦州梅里达的城市环境中采集的雄性埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)中检测到自然感染的黄病毒。
J Med Entomol. 2022 Jul 13;59(4):1336-1346. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjac048.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing dynamics of Aedes aegypti invasion and vector-borne disease risk for rural communities in the Peruvian Amazon.秘鲁亚马逊地区农村社区埃及伊蚊入侵动态变化及病媒传播疾病风险
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Aug 28;19(8):e0012506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012506. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Enhancing protection against vector-borne diseases in forcibly displaced communities: evaluating the efficacy of spatial repellents for cutaneous leishmaniasis control in North-East Syria.加强对被迫流离失所社区媒介传播疾病的防护:评估空间驱避剂对叙利亚东北部皮肤利什曼病防控的效果
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 3;23(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04244-2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of Wolbachia-Infected Mosquito Deployments for the Control of Dengue.沃尔巴克氏体感染蚊子的部署对登革热控制的效果。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2177-2186. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2030243.
2
Efficacy of a Spatial Repellent for Control of Malaria in Indonesia: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.空间驱避剂控制印度尼西亚疟疾的效果:一项集群随机对照试验。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Jul;103(1):344-358. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0554. Epub 2020 May 14.
3
Knowledge, attitudes and practices assessment of malaria interventions in rural Zambia.
Advances in surveillance and control methods for Aedes-borne diseases and urban vectors: report of the International Conference, August 2024, Tanzania.
伊蚊传播疾病和城市病媒监测与控制方法的进展:2024年8月坦桑尼亚国际会议报告
Parasit Vectors. 2025 Jun 6;18(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13071-025-06838-4.
4
Impact of chemical interventions on reducing dengue, Zika, and chikungunya: a systematic review.化学干预措施对减少登革热、寨卡病毒病和基孔肯雅热的影响:一项系统评价
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2025 May 27;49:e51. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2025.51. eCollection 2025.
5
Longitudinal field evaluation of outdoor Anopheles and non-Anopheles host-seeking in response to a volatile pyrethroid spatial emanator (SE) product among forest-dwelling indigenous residents of Sumatra, Indonesia.在印度尼西亚苏门答腊岛森林居住的原住民中,针对一种拟除虫菊酯挥发性空间散发器(SE)产品,对室外按蚊和非按蚊寻找宿主行为进行纵向现场评估。
Malar J. 2025 Apr 10;24(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12936-025-05284-y.
6
Arthropod-Borne and Rodent-Borne Infections in Peru From 1990 to 2022.1990年至2022年秘鲁的节肢动物传播和啮齿动物传播感染
J Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 10;231(Supplement_1):S72-S79. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae608.
7
Effect of a spatial repellent on malaria incidence in an area of western Kenya characterised by high malaria transmission, insecticide resistance, and universal coverage of insecticide treated nets (part of the AEGIS Consortium): a cluster-randomised, controlled trial.在肯尼亚西部一个以疟疾高传播率、杀虫剂抗性以及杀虫剂处理蚊帐全面覆盖为特征的地区,空间驱避剂对疟疾发病率的影响(AEGIS联盟的一部分):一项整群随机对照试验
Lancet. 2025 Jan 11;405(10473):147-156. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02253-0. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
8
A unique mechanism of transfluthrin action revealed by mapping its binding sites in the mosquito sodium channel.通过绘制拟除虫菊酯在蚊子钠离子通道中的结合位点,揭示了其作用的独特机制。
Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2024 Dec;175:104214. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2024.104214. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
9
Advancing spatial repellents for malaria control: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a spatial repellent under operational use in Northern Uganda-study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.推进空间驱避剂在疟疾控制中的应用:在乌干达北部实际使用中的空间驱避剂的有效性和成本效益-一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Aug 22;25(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08378-1.
10
Assessing Wolbachia-mediated sterility for dengue control: emulation of a cluster-randomized target trial in Singapore.评估沃尔巴克氏体介导的绝育控制登革热:在新加坡模拟一项集群随机对照目标试验。
J Travel Med. 2024 Oct 19;31(7). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taae103.
赞比亚农村地区疟疾干预措施的知识、态度和实践评估。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8235-6.
4
Cluster-Randomized Test-Negative Design Trials: A Novel and Efficient Method to Assess the Efficacy of Community-Level Dengue Interventions.整群随机对照试验阴性设计:评估社区层面登革热干预措施效果的一种新颖而有效的方法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Sep 1;187(9):2021-2028. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy099.
5
Efficacy of Aedes aegypti control by indoor Ultra Low Volume (ULV) insecticide spraying in Iquitos, Peru.在秘鲁伊基托斯,通过室内超低容量(ULV)杀虫剂喷雾控制埃及伊蚊的效果。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Apr 6;12(4):e0006378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006378. eCollection 2018 Apr.
6
Field assessment of a novel spatial repellent for malaria control: a feasibility and acceptability study in Mondulkiri, Cambodia.实地评估一种新型疟疾控制空间驱避剂:在柬埔寨蒙多基里的可行性和可接受性研究。
Malar J. 2017 Oct 13;16(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-2059-6.
7
Efficacy and user acceptability of transfluthrin-treated sisal and hessian decorations for protecting against mosquito bites in outdoor bars.用于户外酒吧防蚊的氟氯氰菊酯处理剑麻和粗麻布装饰品的功效及用户接受度。
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Apr 20;10(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2132-6.
8
Current and Future Repellent Technologies: The Potential of Spatial Repellents and Their Place in Mosquito-Borne Disease Control.当前及未来的驱避技术:空间驱避剂的潜力及其在蚊媒疾病控制中的地位。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jan 29;14(2):124. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020124.
9
Is Dengue Vector Control Deficient in Effectiveness or Evidence?: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.登革热病媒控制在有效性还是证据方面存在不足?系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Mar 17;10(3):e0004551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004551. eCollection 2016 Mar.
10
The global burden of dengue: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.登革热的全球负担:来自《2013年全球疾病负担研究》的分析
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Jun;16(6):712-723. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00026-8. Epub 2016 Feb 10.