• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文化紧密度-宽松度和社交网络密度对表达积极和消极情绪的影响:来自 Facebook 用户印象管理的大规模研究。

Effects of Cultural Tightness-Looseness and Social Network Density on Expression of Positive and Negative Emotions: A Large-Scale Study of Impression Management by Facebook Users.

机构信息

1 Singapore Management University, Singapore.

2 Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Nov;44(11):1567-1581. doi: 10.1177/0146167218770999. Epub 2018 May 9.

DOI:10.1177/0146167218770999
PMID:29742997
Abstract

Using data from 13,789 Facebook users across U.S. states, this study examined the main effects of societal-level cultural tightness-looseness and its interaction effects with individuals' social network density on impression management (IM) in terms of online emotional expression. Results showed that individuals from culturally tight (vs. loose) states were more likely to express positive emotions and less likely to express negative emotions. Meanwhile, for positive emotional expression, there was a tightness-looseness by social network density interaction effect. In culturally tight states, individuals with dense (vs. sparse) networks were more likely to express positive emotions, while in culturally loose states this pattern was reversed. For negative emotional expression, however, no such interaction was observed. Our findings highlight the influence of cultural norms and social network structure on emotional expressions as IM strategies.

摘要

本研究利用美国 13789 名 Facebook 用户的数据,考察了社会文化紧密-宽松程度的主要影响及其与个体社交网络密度的交互效应对在线情感表达的印象管理(IM)的影响。结果表明,来自文化紧密(而非宽松)州的个体更有可能表达积极情绪,而较少表达消极情绪。同时,对于积极情绪表达,存在紧密-宽松程度与社交网络密度的交互效应。在文化紧密的州,网络密集(而非稀疏)的个体更有可能表达积极情绪,而在文化宽松的州则相反。然而,对于消极情绪表达,没有观察到这种交互作用。我们的研究结果强调了文化规范和社交网络结构对情感表达作为 IM 策略的影响。

相似文献

1
Effects of Cultural Tightness-Looseness and Social Network Density on Expression of Positive and Negative Emotions: A Large-Scale Study of Impression Management by Facebook Users.文化紧密度-宽松度和社交网络密度对表达积极和消极情绪的影响:来自 Facebook 用户印象管理的大规模研究。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Nov;44(11):1567-1581. doi: 10.1177/0146167218770999. Epub 2018 May 9.
2
The culture of social comparison.社会比较文化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 25;115(39):E9067-E9074. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721555115. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
3
Putting their best foot forward: emotional disclosure on Facebook.积极展示自我:脸书上的情绪表露
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012 Oct;15(10):569-72. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0200. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
4
Do Facebook Status Updates Reflect Subjective Well-Being?脸书状态更新反映主观幸福感吗?
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Jul;18(7):373-9. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0022.
5
Cultural tightness-looseness and normative social influence in eight Asian countries: Associations of individual and collective norms with vaccination intentions.文化紧密度和规范性社会影响在八个亚洲国家:个体和集体规范与疫苗接种意愿的关联。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jan;340:116431. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116431. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
6
Quantifying cultural tightness-looseness in Ecuador.量化厄瓜多尔文化的松紧程度。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 29;16(1):e0246064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246064. eCollection 2021.
7
Personality Traits, Motivations, and Emotional Consequences of Social Media Usage.社交媒体使用的人格特质、动机及情感后果
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017 Oct;20(10):615-623. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0043.
8
Measuring Emotional Contagion in Social Media.衡量社交媒体中的情绪感染
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 6;10(11):e0142390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142390. eCollection 2015.
9
The cultural dimension of tightness-looseness: An analysis of situational constraint in Estonia and Greece.文化的紧密-宽松维度:爱沙尼亚和希腊情境约束的分析。
Int J Psychol. 2015 Jun;50(3):193-204. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12097. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
10
Across-Time Change and Variation in Cultural Tightness-Looseness.文化松紧度的跨时间变化与差异
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 18;10(12):e0145213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145213. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotion regulation and mental health across cultures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.跨文化的情绪调节与心理健康:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Apr 15. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02168-8.
2
Editorial: Understanding the impact of social media on public mental health and crisis management during the COVID-19 pandemic.社论:了解社交媒体在新冠疫情期间对公众心理健康和危机管理的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 16;14:1304586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1304586. eCollection 2023.
3
How we learn social norms: a three-stage model for social norm learning.
我们如何学习社会规范:一个社会规范学习的三阶段模型。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 2;14:1153809. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1153809. eCollection 2023.
4
Validation of the Chinese Cultural Tightness-Looseness Scale and General Tightness-Looseness Scale.中国文化松紧度量表和一般松紧度量表的验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 18;14:1131868. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131868. eCollection 2023.
5
Impact of cultural tightness on vaccination rate.文化紧密性对疫苗接种率的影响。
Risk Manag Insur Rev. 2022 Fall;25(3):367-389. doi: 10.1111/rmir.12223. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
6
The Daily Rhythmic Changes of Undergraduate Students' Emotions: An Analysis Based on Tencent Tweets.大学生情绪的每日节律变化:基于腾讯微博的分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 11;13:785639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785639. eCollection 2022.
7
Increase of Collectivistic Expression in China During the COVID-19 Outbreak: An Empirical Study on Online Social Networks.新冠疫情期间中国集体主义表达的增加:在线社交网络的实证研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 20;12:632204. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.632204. eCollection 2021.
8
Where You Are Is Who You Are? The Geographical Account of Psychological Phenomena.你所在之处即你之所是?心理现象的地理学阐释。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 24;11:536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00536. eCollection 2020.