• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会比较文化。

The culture of social comparison.

机构信息

Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany;

Organizational Behavior Faculty, London Business School, London NW1 4SA, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 25;115(39):E9067-E9074. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721555115. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1721555115
PMID:30201717
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6166806/
Abstract

Social comparison is one of the most ubiquitous features of human social life. This fundamental human tendency to look to others for information about how to think, feel, and behave has provided us with the ability to thrive in a highly complex and interconnected modern social world. Despite its prominent role, however, a detailed understanding of the cultural foundations of social comparison is lacking. The current research aims to fill this gap by showing that two prominent cultural dimensions, tightness-looseness and individualism-collectivism, uniquely explain variation in social-comparison proclivity across individuals, situations, and cultures. We first demonstrate the yet-undocumented link between cultural tightness and comparison proclivity across individuals, and further show that perceptions of ambient tightness and interdependence are uniquely associated with stronger social-comparison tendencies. Next, we show that these associations arise across social settings and can be attributed to properties of the settings themselves, not solely to individual differences. Finally, we show that both tight and collectivistic US states show a propensity to engage in Google searches related to specific social-comparison emotions, but that the tightness-comparison link arises from a unique psychological mechanism. Altogether, these findings show that social comparison-a fundamental aspect of human cognition-is linked to cultural practices based both in prevalence and strength of social norms as well as the tendency to construe the self in relation to others.

摘要

社会比较是人类社会生活中最普遍的特征之一。这种人类倾向于从他人那里获取有关如何思考、感受和行为的信息的基本趋势,使我们能够在高度复杂和相互关联的现代社会世界中茁壮成长。然而,尽管它的作用很突出,但对社会比较的文化基础的详细了解却很缺乏。目前的研究旨在通过展示两个突出的文化维度——紧密性-松散性和个体主义-集体主义,来填补这一空白,这些维度独特地解释了个体、情境和文化中社会比较倾向的变化。我们首先证明了文化紧密性与个体之间的比较倾向之间的联系,进一步表明,对环境紧密性和相互依存性的感知与更强的社会比较倾向有着独特的联系。接下来,我们表明这些关联存在于各种社会环境中,可以归因于环境本身的特性,而不仅仅是个体差异。最后,我们表明,紧密和集体主义的美国各州都表现出一种倾向,即参与与特定社会比较情绪相关的谷歌搜索,但紧密性与比较的联系源于一种独特的心理机制。总的来说,这些发现表明,社会比较——人类认知的一个基本方面——与基于社会规范的普遍性和强度以及将自我与他人联系起来的倾向的文化实践有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2ac/6166806/616363533e0f/pnas.1721555115fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2ac/6166806/1dbffb35075d/pnas.1721555115fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2ac/6166806/616363533e0f/pnas.1721555115fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2ac/6166806/1dbffb35075d/pnas.1721555115fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2ac/6166806/616363533e0f/pnas.1721555115fig02.jpg

相似文献

1
The culture of social comparison.社会比较文化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 25;115(39):E9067-E9074. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721555115. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
2
Effects of Cultural Tightness-Looseness and Social Network Density on Expression of Positive and Negative Emotions: A Large-Scale Study of Impression Management by Facebook Users.文化紧密度-宽松度和社交网络密度对表达积极和消极情绪的影响:来自 Facebook 用户印象管理的大规模研究。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Nov;44(11):1567-1581. doi: 10.1177/0146167218770999. Epub 2018 May 9.
3
Cultural Collectivism and Tightness Moderate Responses to Norm Violators: Effects on Power Perception, Moral Emotions, and Leader Support.文化集体主义与谨严调节对违反规范者的反应:对权力感知、道德情感和领导支持的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Jun;45(6):947-964. doi: 10.1177/0146167218802832. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
4
Cultural Psychology: Beyond East and West.文化心理学:超越东方与西方。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2024 Jan 18;75:495-526. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-021723-063333. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
5
The cultural dimension of tightness-looseness: An analysis of situational constraint in Estonia and Greece.文化的紧密-宽松维度:爱沙尼亚和希腊情境约束的分析。
Int J Psychol. 2015 Jun;50(3):193-204. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12097. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
6
When guiding principles do not guide: The moderating effects of cultural tightness on value-behavior links.当指导原则不起指导作用时:文化严谨性对价值观-行为关系的调节作用。
J Pers. 2021 Apr;89(2):325-337. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12584. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
7
Are cultures becoming individualistic? A cross-temporal comparison of individualism-collectivism in the United States and Japan.文化是否变得越来越个人主义?对美国和日本个人主义-集体主义的跨时间比较。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012 Feb;16(1):3-24. doi: 10.1177/1088868311411587. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
8
Quantifying cultural tightness-looseness in Ecuador.量化厄瓜多尔文化的松紧程度。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 29;16(1):e0246064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246064. eCollection 2021.
9
Neural basis of individualistic and collectivistic views of self.自我的个人主义和集体主义观点的神经基础。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Sep;30(9):2813-20. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20707.
10
On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness.论文化松紧性的本质与重要性。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1225-44. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1225.

引用本文的文献

1
Peer pressure, anxiety, and smartphone addiction among Chinese college students: a mediation analysis.中国大学生中的同伴压力、焦虑与智能手机成瘾:一项中介效应分析
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 10;13(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03107-y.
2
Being the Best, or With the Best: A Developmental Examination of Children's Choices in a Social Comparison Dilemma.成为最佳,还是与最佳同行:对儿童在社会比较困境中选择的发展性考察。
Dev Sci. 2025 May;28(3):e70017. doi: 10.1111/desc.70017.
3
The Relationship Between Social Anxiety and Depression Among Rural High School Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Social Comparison and Social Support.

本文引用的文献

1
That's how "you" do it: Generic you expresses norms during early childhood.“你”是这样做的:泛指的“你”在幼儿期表达规范。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:183-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 May 26.
2
How "you" makes meaning.“你”如何产生意义。
Science. 2017 Mar 24;355(6331):1299-1302. doi: 10.1126/science.aaj2014.
3
Cross-validation of cultural tightness and looseness measures.文化严谨性和宽松性测量的交叉验证。
农村高中青少年社交焦虑与抑郁的关系:社会比较和社会支持的中介作用
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 28;13(5):533. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13050533.
4
Metacognitive strategies improve self-regulation skills in expert sports coaches.元认知策略可提高专业体育教练的自我调节技能。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 27;15(1):3434. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86606-7.
5
The persuasive role of generic-you in online interactions.通用第二人称“你”在网络互动中的说服作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):1347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83440-1.
6
Examining an integrated path model of psychological and sociocultural predictors of camouflaging in autistic adults.考察自闭症成年人伪装行为的心理和社会文化预测因素的综合路径模型。
Autism. 2024 Jul 27:13623613241262110. doi: 10.1177/13623613241262110.
7
Shyness and self-consistency and congruence among Chinese adolescents: mediating role of social comparison orientation and moderating role of self-focused attention.中国青少年的羞怯与自我一致性和协调性:社会比较取向的中介作用与自我聚焦关注的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 9;15:1418123. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1418123. eCollection 2024.
8
Economic segregation is associated with reduced concerns about economic inequality.经济隔离与对经济不平等的担忧减少有关。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 5;15(1):5655. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49778-w.
9
Daily social comparisons among women in midlife with elevated risk for cardiovascular disease: A within-person test of the identification/contrast model.中年心血管疾病高危女性的日常社会比较:认同/对比模型的个体内检验。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2024 Nov;16(4):1778-1800. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12553. Epub 2024 May 24.
10
Comparison Is the Thief of Joy? Introducing the Attitudes Towards Social Comparison Inventory.比较是快乐的小偷?引入态度对社会比较量表。
Assessment. 2024 Jul;31(5):1052-1069. doi: 10.1177/10731911231203968. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
Int J Psychol. 2018 Aug;53(4):287-294. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12376. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
4
Estimating search engine index size variability: a 9-year longitudinal study.估计搜索引擎索引大小的变异性:一项为期9年的纵向研究。
Scientometrics. 2016;107:839-856. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1863-z. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
5
How culture gets embrained: Cultural differences in event-related potentials of social norm violations.文化如何嵌入大脑:社会规范违反相关事件电位的文化差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 15;112(50):15348-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509839112. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
6
The tango of two deadly sins: The social-functional relation of envy and pride.两种致命罪恶的交织:嫉妒和骄傲的社会功能关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Sep;109(3):453-72. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000026. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
7
Cultures and Selves: A Cycle of Mutual Constitution.文化与自我:一个相互构成的循环。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;5(4):420-30. doi: 10.1177/1745691610375557.
8
Tightness-looseness across the 50 united states.50 个州的紧松度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 3;111(22):7990-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317937111. Epub 2014 May 19.
9
The role of culture-gene coevolution in morality judgment: examining the interplay between tightness-looseness and allelic variation of the serotonin transporter gene.文化-基因共同进化在道德判断中的作用:审视社会规范松紧程度与血清素转运体基因等位基因变异之间的相互作用。
Cult Brain. 2013;1(2):100-117. doi: 10.1007/s40167-013-0009-x. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
10
Neural evidence for individual and cultural variability in the social comparison effect.社会比较效应中个体和文化差异的神经证据。
J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 9;33(41):16200-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5084-12.2013.