• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人相对剥夺感量表韩文版的编制与初步验证。

Development and preliminary validation of a Korean version of the Personal Relative Deprivation Scale.

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Psychology, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0197279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197279. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0197279
PMID:29746534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5945005/
Abstract

The current research developed and validated a Korean-translated version of the Personal Relative Deprivation Scale (PRDS). The PRDS measures individual differences in people's tendencies to feel resentful about what they have compared to what other people like them have. Across 2 studies, Exploratory Factor Analyses revealed that the two reverse-worded items from the original PRDS did not load onto the primary factor for the Korean-translated PRDS. A reduced 3-item Korean PRDS, however, showed good convergent validity. Replicating previous findings using Western samples, greater tendencies to make social comparisons of abilities (but not opinions) were associated with higher PRDS (Studies 1 and 2), and participants scoring higher on the 3-item Korean PRDS were more materialistic (Studies 1 and 2), reported worse physical health (Study 1), had lower self-esteem (Study 2) and experienced higher stress (Study 2).

摘要

当前的研究开发并验证了个人相对剥夺感量表(PRDS)的韩语翻译版本。PRDS 衡量了人们与喜欢他们的其他人相比,对自己所拥有的东西感到不满的倾向的个体差异。在两项研究中,探索性因素分析表明,原始 PRDS 中的两个反向词项没有加载到韩语翻译 PRDS 的主要因素上。然而,一个简化的 3 项韩语 PRDS 显示出良好的收敛效度。使用西方样本复制了先前的发现,与更高的 PRDS 相关的是更倾向于对能力(而不是意见)进行社会比较(研究 1 和 2),并且在 3 项韩语 PRDS 中得分较高的参与者更注重物质享受(研究 1 和 2),报告的身体健康状况较差(研究 1),自尊心较低(研究 2),压力较大(研究 2)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc65/5945005/c64a6b9abde3/pone.0197279.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc65/5945005/c64a6b9abde3/pone.0197279.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc65/5945005/c64a6b9abde3/pone.0197279.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and preliminary validation of a Korean version of the Personal Relative Deprivation Scale.个人相对剥夺感量表韩文版的编制与初步验证。
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0197279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197279. eCollection 2018.
2
Korean version of the Revised Caregiving Appraisal Scale: a translation and validation study.《修订版照顾者评估量表韩语版:一项翻译与验证研究》
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Aug;59(4):407-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04346.x.
3
Development of a Korean version of the Female Sexual Distress Scale.《女性性困扰量表》韩文版的编制
J Sex Med. 2006 Nov;3(6):1013-1017. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00328.x.
4
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short-Form in Cancer Patients.癌症患者应对与适应处理量表简版韩文版的信效度研究
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018 Jun;48(3):375-388. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.3.375.
5
Development and validation of the revised Identity Style Inventory (ISI-5): factor structure, reliability, and validity.修订版身份风格量表(ISI-5)的编制与验证:结构、信度与效度。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):893-904. doi: 10.1037/a0032642. Epub 2013 May 6.
6
Psychometric Properties of Korean Version of Self-Efficacy of Evidence-Based Practice Scale.《循证实践自我效能量表韩文版的心理测量学特性》
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2016 Sep;10(3):207-212. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 29.
7
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE) for individuals with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者适用的韩语版肺康复自我效能适应性指数(PRAISE)的心理测量特性。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Aug 29;12:2611-2620. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S142488. eCollection 2017.
8
[Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population].应对方式的多维评估:法国人群中简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)的效度验证
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-18.
9
[Psychometric properties of the French version of the How I Think Questionnaire].[《我如何思考问卷》法语版的心理测量学特性]
Encephale. 2013 Dec;39(6):401-7. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.10.013. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
10
Social anxiety and fear of negative evaluation: construct validity of the BFNE-II.社交焦虑与对负面评价的恐惧:BFNE-II的结构效度
J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(1):131-41. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.010. Epub 2006 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence mechanism of relative deprivation on prosocial behavior of migrant children: based on the mediating effect of self-esteem and the moderating effect of social support.相对剥夺对流动儿童亲社会行为的影响机制:基于自尊的中介作用和社会支持的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 16;16:1610985. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1610985. eCollection 2025.
2
Personal Relative Deprivation and Locus of Control.个人相对剥夺感与控制点
J Pers. 2025 Aug;93(4):845-865. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12980. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
3
Gambling in a U.S. Census Matched Sample: Examining Interactions between Means and Motives in Predicting Problematic Outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
The Interrelations Between Social Class, Personal Relative Deprivation, and Prosociality.社会阶层、个人相对剥夺感与亲社会行为之间的相互关系。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017 Aug;8(6):660-669. doi: 10.1177/1948550616673877. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
2
Social comparison, personal relative deprivation, and materialism.社会比较、个人相对剥夺感与物质主义。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2017 Jun;56(2):373-392. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12176. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
3
Predicting self-rated mental and physical health: the contributions of subjective socioeconomic status and personal relative deprivation.
美国人口匹配样本中的赌博行为:检验手段与动机在预测问题结果方面的交互作用。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Sep;40(3):1399-1421. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10302-w. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
4
Feelings of Personal Relative Deprivation and Subjective Well-Being in Japan.日本的个人相对剥夺感与主观幸福感
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb 11;13(2):158. doi: 10.3390/bs13020158.
5
The Japanese version of the Material Values Scale: construct assessment and relationship with age, personality, and subjective well-being.《物质价值观量表》的日译本:结构评估及其与年龄、人格和主观幸福感的关系。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Aug 13;10(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00889-3.
6
The contributions of social comparison to social network site addiction.社会比较对社交网站成瘾的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 28;16(10):e0257795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257795. eCollection 2021.
预测自评身心健康:主观社会经济地位和个人相对剥夺感的作用
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 22;6:1415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01415. eCollection 2015.
4
The relation between personal relative deprivation and the urge to gamble among gamblers is moderated by problem gambling severity: a meta-analysis.个人相对剥夺感与赌徒赌博冲动之间的关系受问题赌博严重程度的调节:一项荟萃分析。
Addict Behav. 2015 Jun;45:146-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.01.031. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
5
Relative deprivation: a theoretical and meta-analytic review.相对剥夺感:理论与元分析综述。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012 Aug;16(3):203-32. doi: 10.1177/1088868311430825. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
6
Personal relative deprivation, delay discounting, and gambling.个体相对剥夺感、延迟折扣与赌博。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Nov;101(5):955-73. doi: 10.1037/a0024778.
7
Self-focused attention and emotional reactivity: the role of culture.自我聚焦注意力和情绪反应性:文化的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar;98(3):507-519. doi: 10.1037/a0018534.
8
Gambling as a search for justice: examining the role of personal relative deprivation in gambling urges and gambling behavior.将赌博视为对正义的探寻:审视个人相对剥夺感在赌博冲动和赌博行为中的作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Nov;34(11):1514-29. doi: 10.1177/0146167208322956. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
9
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.用于评估和比较多重中介模型中间接效应的渐近和重抽样策略。
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879.
10
Downsides of an overly context-sensitive self: implications from the culture and subjective well-being research.过度情境敏感自我的弊端:来自文化与主观幸福感研究的启示
J Pers. 2007 Dec;75(6):1321-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00477.x.