• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自美国时间使用调查的体验式幸福感数据:与其他方法的比较以及按年龄和收入的分析示例

Experiential wellbeing data from the American Time Use Survey: Comparisons with other methods and analytic illustrations with age and income.

作者信息

Stone Arthur A, Schneider Stefan, Krueger Alan, Schwartz Joseph E, Deaton Angus

机构信息

Dornsife Center for Self-Report Science and the Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Dornsife Center for Self-Report Science, Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Soc Indic Res. 2018 Feb;136(1):359-378. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1532-x. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1007/s11205-016-1532-x
PMID:29755178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5945215/
Abstract

There has been a recent upsurge of interest in self-reported measures of wellbeing by official statisticians and by researchers in the social sciences. This paper considers data from a wellbeing supplement to the American Time Use Survey (ATUS), which parsed the previous day into episodes. Respondents provided ratings of five experiential wellbeing adjectives (happiness, stress, tiredness, sadness, and pain) for each of three randomly selected episodes. Because the ATUS Well-being module has not received very much attention, in this paper we provide the reader with details about the features of these data and our approach to analyzing the data (e.g., weighting considerations), and then illustrate the applicability of these data to current issues. Specifically, we examine the association of age and income with all of the experiential wellbeing adjective in the ATUS. Results from the ATUS wellbeing module were broadly consistent with earlier findings on age, but did not confirm all earlier findings between income and wellbeing. We conclude that the ATUS, with its measurement of time use, specific activities, and hedonic experience in a nationally representative survey, offers a unique opportunity to incorporate time use into the burgeoning field of wellbeing research.

摘要

近期,官方统计学家和社会科学研究人员对自我报告的幸福感测度兴趣激增。本文考虑了来自《美国时间使用调查》(ATUS)幸福感补充调查的数据,该调查将前一天划分为多个时间段。受访者对随机选取的三个时间段中的每一个,就五个体验式幸福感形容词(幸福、压力、疲惫、悲伤和痛苦)给出评分。由于ATUS幸福感模块尚未受到太多关注,本文向读者详细介绍了这些数据的特征以及我们分析数据的方法(例如加权考量),然后说明这些数据在当前问题中的适用性。具体而言,我们考察了ATUS中年龄和收入与所有体验式幸福感形容词之间的关联。ATUS幸福感模块的结果与早期关于年龄的研究结果大致一致,但并未证实所有早期关于收入与幸福感之间关系的研究结果。我们得出结论,ATUS在全国代表性调查中对时间使用、具体活动和享乐体验进行了测度,为将时间使用纳入新兴的幸福感研究领域提供了独特契机。

相似文献

1
Experiential wellbeing data from the American Time Use Survey: Comparisons with other methods and analytic illustrations with age and income.来自美国时间使用调查的体验式幸福感数据:与其他方法的比较以及按年龄和收入的分析示例
Soc Indic Res. 2018 Feb;136(1):359-378. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1532-x. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Mixed emotions across the adult life span in the United States.美国成年人一生的复杂情感。
Psychol Aging. 2015 Jun;30(2):369-82. doi: 10.1037/pag0000018. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
4
Using the experience-sampling method to examine the psychological mechanisms by which participatory art improves wellbeing.运用经验抽样法考察参与式艺术增进幸福感的心理机制。
Perspect Public Health. 2018 Jan;138(1):55-65. doi: 10.1177/1757913917739041. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
5
Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing.主观幸福感、健康与衰老。
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):640-648. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
6
How Much Time Do Patients Spend on Outpatient Visits?: The American Time Use Survey.患者在门诊就诊上花费了多少时间?:美国时间使用调查。
Patient. 2008 Jul 1;1(3):211-22. doi: 10.2165/1312067-200801030-00008.
7
Investigating the American Time Use Survey from an exposure modeling perspective.从暴露建模的角度研究美国时间利用调查。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;21(1):92-105. doi: 10.1038/jes.2009.60. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
8
Disability, participation, and subjective wellbeing among older couples.老年人夫妇的残疾、参与和主观幸福感。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Feb;74(4):588-96. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.018. Epub 2011 Nov 27.
9
Distinguishing between frequency and intensity of health-related symptoms from diary assessments.通过日记评估区分与健康相关症状的频率和强度。
J Psychosom Res. 2014 Sep;77(3):205-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
10
Experiential learning spaces and student wellbeing: a mixed-methods study of students at three research intensive UK universities.体验式学习空间与学生幸福感:对三所英国研究型大学学生的混合方法研究。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2023 Nov-Dec;35(7-8):591-604. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2023.2268720. Epub 2023 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Being as Having, Loving, and Doing: A Theory of Human Well-Being.存在、拥有、爱与做:一种人类幸福理论。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024 Nov;28(4):372-397. doi: 10.1177/10888683241263634. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
2
Remote working and experiential wellbeing: A latent lifestyle perspective using UK time use survey before and during COVID-19.远程工作和体验幸福感:使用英国时间使用调查,在 COVID-19 之前和期间的潜在生活方式视角。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 25;19(7):e0305096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305096. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploring the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Americans time use related subjective wellbeing.探究新冠疫情对美国人时间利用相关主观幸福感的影响。
Wellbeing Space Soc. 2023;4:100148. doi: 10.1016/j.wss.2023.100148. Epub 2023 May 13.
4
Income raises human well-being indefinitely, but age consistently slashes it.收入会无限提升人类福祉,但年龄却始终在削减它。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 11;13(1):5905. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33235-7.
5
Clarifying Eudaimonia and Psychological Functioning to Complement Evaluative and Experiential Well-Being: Why Basic Psychological Needs Should Be Measured in National Accounts of Well-Being.澄清幸福和心理功能以补充评价和体验幸福感:为什么基本心理需求应该在幸福感的国民账户中进行衡量。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;18(5):1121-1135. doi: 10.1177/17456916221141099. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
6
Informal caregiving, time use and experienced wellbeing.非正式照护、时间利用与体验幸福感。
Health Econ. 2023 Feb;32(2):356-374. doi: 10.1002/hec.4624. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
7
Money Does Not Always Buy Happiness, but Are Richer People Less Happy in Their Daily Lives? It Depends on How You Analyze Income.金钱并不总是能买来幸福,但富人在日常生活中就没那么幸福吗?这取决于你如何分析收入。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 31;13:883137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883137. eCollection 2022.
8
Loneliness from Young Adulthood to Old Age: Explaining Age Differences in Loneliness.从青年期到老年期的孤独感:解释孤独感的年龄差异
Int J Behav Dev. 2022 Jan 1;46(1):39-49. doi: 10.1177/0165025420971048. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
9
Measuring Online Wellbeing: A Scoping Review of Subjective Wellbeing Measures.衡量网络幸福感:主观幸福感测量的范围综述
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 11;12:616637. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616637. eCollection 2021.
10
Psychological impacts from COVID-19 among university students: Risk factors across seven states in the United States.COVID-19 对大学生心理的影响:来自美国七个州的风险因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):e0245327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245327. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Income reliably predicts daily sadness, but not happiness: A replication and extension of Kushlev, Dunn, & Lucas (2015).收入能可靠地预测每日的悲伤情绪,但不能预测幸福:对库什列夫、邓恩和卢卡斯(2015年)研究的复制与拓展。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2016 Nov;7(8):828-836. doi: 10.1177/1948550616657599. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
2
The Measure Matters: An Investigation of Evaluative and Experience-Based Measures of Wellbeing in Time Use Data.度量很重要:对时间使用数据中基于评估和体验的幸福度量的调查。
Soc Indic Res. 2017;134(1):57-73. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1429-8. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
3
Reliability, Validity, and Variability of the Subjective Well-Being Questions in the 2010 American Time Use Survey.2010年美国时间使用调查中主观幸福感问题的信度、效度和变异性
Soc Indic Res. 2016 Apr 1;126(3):1355-1373. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0923-8. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
4
Time for Each Other: Work and Family Constraints Among Couples.相互陪伴的时间:夫妻间的工作与家庭限制
J Marriage Fam. 2016 Feb 1;78(1):142-164. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12255. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
5
Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing.主观幸福感、健康与衰老。
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):640-648. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
6
Distinguishing between frequency and intensity of health-related symptoms from diary assessments.通过日记评估区分与健康相关症状的频率和强度。
J Psychosom Res. 2014 Sep;77(3):205-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
7
Validation of a Brief Yesterday Measure of Hedonic Well-Being and Daily Activities: Comparison with the Day Reconstruction Method.一种用于衡量享乐幸福感和日常活动的简短昨日量表的验证:与日重建法的比较。
Soc Indic Res. 2014 Feb 1;115(3):907-917. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0240-z.
8
Emotional experience in the mornings and the evenings: consideration of age differences in specific emotions by time of day.早晚的情绪体验:考虑特定情绪的日间时间差异中的年龄差异。
Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 6;5:185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00185. eCollection 2014.
9
More years, less yawns: fresh evidence on tiredness by age and other factors.年龄和其他因素导致的疲劳:新的研究证据表明,年龄越大,疲劳感越少。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015 Jul;70(4):576-80. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt118. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
10
The new stylized facts about income and subjective well-being.收入和主观幸福感的新风格化事实。
Emotion. 2012 Dec;12(6):1181-7. doi: 10.1037/a0029873.