• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

度量很重要:对时间使用数据中基于评估和体验的幸福度量的调查。

The Measure Matters: An Investigation of Evaluative and Experience-Based Measures of Wellbeing in Time Use Data.

作者信息

Dolan Paul, Kudrna Laura, Stone Arthur

机构信息

Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE UK.

Center for Self-Report Science, University of Southern California Dornsife, 3620 McClintock Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061 USA.

出版信息

Soc Indic Res. 2017;134(1):57-73. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1429-8. Epub 2016 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1007/s11205-016-1429-8
PMID:28983145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5599459/
Abstract

Measures of subjective wellbeing (SWB) are used to understand how people think and feel about their lives and experiences. But the measure used matters to conclusions about how well people's lives are going. This research compares life evaluations and experienced SWB using nationally representative time use diaries, advancing previous research because diaries are less subject to recall biases than other, more popular methods. Analyses of over 20,000 US residents in 2012-2013 show life evaluations are more closely associated with positive and negative affect than experienced meaningfulness. Women have higher SWB than men except for negative affect, older age groups have higher SWB than middle age groups except for experienced meaningfulness, and younger age groups report the lowest experienced meaning. The unemployed have low life evaluations but experiences of SWB are similar across employment groups. A complete picture of SWB requires a complete set of measures.

摘要

主观幸福感(SWB)的衡量指标用于了解人们如何看待和感受自己的生活及经历。但所使用的衡量指标对于关于人们生活状况的结论很重要。本研究使用具有全国代表性的时间使用日记来比较生活评价和体验到的主观幸福感,这推进了先前的研究,因为日记比其他更流行的方法更不容易受到回忆偏差的影响。对2012 - 2013年超过20000名美国居民的分析表明,生活评价与积极和消极情绪的关联比与体验到的意义更紧密。除了消极情绪外,女性的主观幸福感高于男性;除了体验到的意义外,老年群体的主观幸福感高于中年群体;而年轻群体报告的体验到的意义最低。失业者的生活评价较低,但各就业群体的主观幸福感体验相似。主观幸福感的完整图景需要一套完整的衡量指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbfd/5599459/245a2924de8e/11205_2016_1429_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbfd/5599459/f1d8d14d77e7/11205_2016_1429_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbfd/5599459/d4f06726f985/11205_2016_1429_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbfd/5599459/b916e34a502f/11205_2016_1429_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbfd/5599459/245a2924de8e/11205_2016_1429_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbfd/5599459/f1d8d14d77e7/11205_2016_1429_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbfd/5599459/d4f06726f985/11205_2016_1429_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbfd/5599459/b916e34a502f/11205_2016_1429_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbfd/5599459/245a2924de8e/11205_2016_1429_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Measure Matters: An Investigation of Evaluative and Experience-Based Measures of Wellbeing in Time Use Data.度量很重要:对时间使用数据中基于评估和体验的幸福度量的调查。
Soc Indic Res. 2017;134(1):57-73. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1429-8. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
2
The assessment of psychometric properties for the subjective wellbeing-5 dimensions (SWB-5D) questionnaire in the general Dutch population.主观幸福感-5 维度(SWB-5D)问卷在荷兰普通人群中的心理测量学特性评估。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Jan;32(1):237-245. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03234-8. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
3
Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: emotional and cognitive evaluations of life.人格、文化与主观幸福感:对生活的情感和认知评价。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:403-25. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056. Epub 2002 Jun 10.
4
Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index.主观幸福感。幸福科学与一项国家指数提案。
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):34-43.
5
Social Security Satisfaction and People's Subjective Wellbeing in China: The Serial Mediation Effect of Social Fairness and Social Trust.中国社会保障满意度与民众主观幸福感:社会公平与社会信任的链式中介效应
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 4;13:855530. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.855530. eCollection 2022.
6
Sexual Health and Positive Subjective Well-Being in Partnered Older Men and Women.伴侣关系中的老年男性和女性的性健康与积极的主观幸福感
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 Jul;71(4):698-710. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw018. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
7
Speech language therapists' experiences with subjective well-being in people with aphasia.言语治疗师对失语症患者主观幸福感的体验。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):473-484. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12596. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
8
Age, cumulative (dis)advantage, and subjective well-being in employed and unemployed Germans: a moderated mediation model.年龄、累积(不利)优势与德国就业和失业人群的主观幸福感:一个有调节的中介模型。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2012 Jan;17(1):93-104. doi: 10.1037/a0026426. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
9
Les Misérables: An analysis of low SWB across the world.《悲惨世界》:对全球低主观幸福感的分析。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 8;14:1107939. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1107939. eCollection 2023.
10
Using path analysis to investigate the relationships between standardized instruments that measure health-related quality of life, capability wellbeing and subjective wellbeing: An application in the context of spinal cord injury.采用路径分析方法研究测量健康相关生活质量、能力幸福感和主观幸福感的标准化工具之间的关系:在脊髓损伤背景下的应用。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Sep;213:154-164. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.041. Epub 2018 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Cluster Randomised Waitlist-Controlled Trial of a Goal-Based Behaviour Change Intervention Implemented in Workplaces.一项在工作场所实施的基于目标的行为改变干预措施的混合方法整群随机等待名单对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 8;22(3):398. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030398.
2
Momentary PERMA: An Adapted Measurement Tool for Studying Well-Being in Daily Life.瞬时PERMA:一种用于研究日常生活幸福感的适配测量工具。
J Happiness Stud. 2023;24(8):2441-2472. doi: 10.1007/s10902-023-00684-w. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
3
Protocol for a cluster randomised waitlist-controlled trial of a goal-based behaviour change intervention for employees in workplaces enrolled in health and wellbeing initiatives.

本文引用的文献

1
Income reliably predicts daily sadness, but not happiness: A replication and extension of Kushlev, Dunn, & Lucas (2015).收入能可靠地预测每日的悲伤情绪,但不能预测幸福:对库什列夫、邓恩和卢卡斯(2015年)研究的复制与拓展。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2016 Nov;7(8):828-836. doi: 10.1177/1948550616657599. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
2
Validation of a Brief Yesterday Measure of Hedonic Well-Being and Daily Activities: Comparison with the Day Reconstruction Method.一种用于衡量享乐幸福感和日常活动的简短昨日量表的验证:与日重建法的比较。
Soc Indic Res. 2014 Feb 1;115(3):907-917. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0240-z.
3
Addressing the Social Determinants of Subjective Wellbeing: The Latest Challenge for Social Policy.
一项基于目标的行为改变干预措施的群组随机候补对照试验方案,该措施针对参加健康和福利计划的工作场所员工。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 28;18(9):e0282848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282848. eCollection 2023.
4
Les Misérables: An analysis of low SWB across the world.《悲惨世界》:对全球低主观幸福感的分析。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 8;14:1107939. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1107939. eCollection 2023.
5
Informal caregiving, time use and experienced wellbeing.非正式照护、时间利用与体验幸福感。
Health Econ. 2023 Feb;32(2):356-374. doi: 10.1002/hec.4624. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
6
Negative vs. Positive Psychology: a Review of Science of Well-Being.消极心理学与积极心理学:幸福科学综述
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Dec;58(4):1091-1122. doi: 10.1007/s12124-022-09708-1. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
7
Investigating adult age differences in real-life empathy, prosociality, and well-being using experience sampling.采用经验抽样法研究现实生活中的同理心、亲社会行为和幸福感的成人年龄差异。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 2;12(1):3450. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06620-x.
8
The Role of Personality in Prediction of Satisfaction With Life in Recreational Athletes During the First Wave of Pandemic Covid-19.人格在新冠疫情第一波期间对休闲运动员生活满意度预测中的作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 20;12:820045. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.820045. eCollection 2021.
9
Predictors of subjective well-being in Korean men and women: Analysis of nationwide panel survey data.韩国男性和女性主观幸福感的预测因素:基于全国性面板调查数据的分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 10;17(2):e0263170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263170. eCollection 2022.
10
Measuring functional ability in healthy ageing: a nationwide cross-sectional survey in the Philippine older population.测量健康老龄化人群的功能能力:菲律宾老年人群的全国性横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 11;11(10):e050827. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050827.
应对主观幸福感的社会决定因素:社会政策的最新挑战。
J Soc Policy. 2013 Jul;42(3):541-565. doi: 10.1017/S0047279413000202.
4
Evidence for a midlife crisis in great apes consistent with the U-shape in human well-being.有证据表明,在中年时期,大型猿类也会经历类似于人类幸福感呈 U 型的危机。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 4;109(49):19949-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212592109. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
5
The financial crisis and the well-being of Americans.金融危机与美国人的福祉。
Oxf Econ Pap. 2012 Jan;64(1):1-26. doi: 10.1093/oep/gpr051.
6
Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: a meta-analysis.主观幸福感与生活事件适应:一项元分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar;102(3):592-615. doi: 10.1037/a0025948. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
7
Finding the key to happy aging: a day reconstruction study of happiness.寻找快乐老龄化的关键:一项关于幸福感的日间重建研究。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 Nov;66(6):665-74. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr040. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
8
Emotional experience improves with age: evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling.情绪体验随着年龄的增长而改善:基于超过 10 年经验抽样的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Mar;26(1):21-33. doi: 10.1037/a0021285.
9
High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being.高收入提高对生活的评价,但不能提高情绪幸福感。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 21;107(38):16489-93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011492107. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
10
A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States.美国心理健康状况年龄分布的概况。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 1;107(22):9985-90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003744107. Epub 2010 May 17.