Public Health Nutrition, University of Paderborn, 33098 Paderborn, Germany.
Nutritional Epidemiology, University of Bonn, DONALD Study, 44225 Dortmund, Germany.
Nutrients. 2018 May 12;10(5):606. doi: 10.3390/nu10050606.
It has been postulated that dietary sugar consumption contributes to increased inflammatory processes in humans, and that this may be specific to fructose (alone, in sucrose or in high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS)). Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis and systematic literature review to evaluate the relevance of fructose, sucrose, HFCS, and glucose consumption for systemic levels of biomarkers of subclinical inflammation. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries were searched for controlled intervention studies that report the effects of dietary sugar intake on (hs)CRP, IL-6, IL-18, IL-1RA, TNF-α, MCP-1, sICAM-1, sE-selectin, or adiponectin. Included studies were conducted on adults or adolescents with ≥20 participants and ≥2 weeks duration. Thirteen studies investigating 1141 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Sufficient studies (≥3) to pool were only available for (hs)CRP. Using a random effects model, pooled effects of the interventions (investigated as mean difference (MD)) revealed no differences in (hs)CRP between fructose intervention and glucose control groups (MD: −0.03 mg/L (95% CI: −0.52, 0.46), ² = 44%). Similarly, no differences were observed between HFCS and sucrose interventions (MD: 0.21 mg/L (−0.11, 0.53), ² = 0%). The quality of evidence was evaluated using Nutrigrade, and was rated low for these two comparisons. The limited evidence available to date does not support the hypothesis that dietary fructose, as found alone or in HFCS, contributes more to subclinical inflammation than other dietary sugars.
有人假设,饮食中的糖摄入量会增加人体的炎症反应,而且这种影响可能是特定于果糖(单独、在蔗糖或高果糖玉米糖浆 (HFCS) 中)的。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析和系统文献综述,以评估果糖、蔗糖、HFCS 和葡萄糖摄入量与亚临床炎症生物标志物的系统水平之间的相关性。我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆中搜索了报告饮食糖摄入量对 (hs)CRP、IL-6、IL-18、IL-1RA、TNF-α、MCP-1、sICAM-1、sE-选择素或脂联素影响的对照干预研究。纳入的研究对象为成年人或青少年,参与者人数不少于 20 人,且研究持续时间不少于 2 周。共有 13 项研究纳入了 1141 名参与者,对其进行了荟萃分析。只有足够的研究(≥3 项)可以进行汇总,才可以评估 (hs)CRP 的汇总效果。使用随机效应模型,干预措施的汇总效果(以均数差 (MD) 表示)显示,果糖干预组与葡萄糖对照组之间的 (hs)CRP 无差异(MD:−0.03 mg/L(95%CI:−0.52, 0.46),² = 44%)。同样,在 HFCS 和蔗糖干预组之间也未观察到差异(MD:0.21 mg/L(−0.11, 0.53),² = 0%)。使用 Nutrigrade 评估证据质量,这两种比较的证据质量均被评为低。目前可用的有限证据并不支持以下假设,即饮食中的果糖(单独或以 HFCS 的形式存在)比其他饮食糖更易导致亚临床炎症。