Suppr超能文献

在针对非裔美国人的干预试验中,可感知益处和障碍在结直肠癌筛查中的作用。

The role of perceived benefits and barriers in colorectal cancer screening in intervention trials among African Americans.

机构信息

Department of Behavioral and Community Health.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, School of Public Health, 4200 Valley Drive, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2018 Jun 1;33(3):205-217. doi: 10.1093/her/cyy013.

Abstract

The Health Belief Model (HBM) is widely used in health behavior interventions. The lack of diverse samples in the development of this theory warrants additional study on how it performs among minorities. While studies have utilized HBM to address colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, limited information exists confirming how these constructs influence screening. Data from three CRC screening trials were used to examine how perceived benefits/barriers perform among African Americans (AA) and whether they serve as mechanisms of the intervention effects on screening. The data were collected in AA churches (Study 1: N = 103; Study 2: N = 285; Study 3: N = 374) where lay members conducted CRC education to increase screening. Participants perceived benefits from colonoscopy (M = 2.4/3, SD = 0.87) and perceived few barriers (M = 0.63/8, SD = 1.1). Benefits were perceived for the fecal occult blood test (M = 11.4/15, SD = 2.1), and few barriers were reported (M = 11.7/30, SD = 3.4). Benefits more consistently predicted pre-intervention screening relative to barriers. For Study 3, individuals with fewer barriers reported a greater increase in colonoscopy screening at 12-months versus those with higher barriers (OR = 0.595, 95% CI = 0.368-0.964), P = 0.035). Benefits/barriers did not mediate the relationship. Potential measurement limitations, particularly for barriers, were uncovered and further research on how to assess factors preventing AA from screening is needed.

摘要

健康信念模型(HBM)广泛应用于健康行为干预。该理论在发展过程中缺乏多样化的样本,因此需要进一步研究其在少数群体中的表现。虽然已有研究利用 HBM 来解决结直肠癌(CRC)筛查问题,但关于这些结构如何影响筛查的信息有限。本研究使用了三项 CRC 筛查试验的数据,以检验非裔美国人(AA)对感知益处/障碍的看法,以及这些结构是否作为干预对筛查影响的机制。数据是在 AA 教堂收集的(研究 1:N = 103;研究 2:N = 285;研究 3:N = 374),在那里,非专业成员进行了 CRC 教育以提高筛查率。参与者认为结肠镜检查的益处(M = 2.4/3,SD = 0.87)很大,认为很少有障碍(M = 0.63/8,SD = 1.1)。粪便潜血试验(M = 11.4/15,SD = 2.1)的益处也被感知到,而报告的障碍很少(M = 11.7/30,SD = 3.4)。益处比障碍更能预测干预前的筛查。对于研究 3,与障碍较多的个体相比,障碍较少的个体在 12 个月时报告结肠镜检查筛查的增加幅度更大(OR = 0.595,95%CI = 0.368-0.964),P = 0.035)。益处/障碍并没有调节这种关系。研究发现了潜在的测量局限性,特别是对于障碍,需要进一步研究如何评估阻止 AA 进行筛查的因素。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Evaluation of prevention behaviour and its influencing factors with respect to cancer screening.癌症筛查预防行为及其影响因素评估。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Jul;148(7):1559-1567. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-03963-w. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验