Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;33(8):1057-1064. doi: 10.1002/gps.4893. Epub 2018 May 15.
We sought to replicate a previously published prediction model for progression, developed in the Cache County Dementia Progression Study, using a clinical cohort from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center.
We included 1120 incident Alzheimer disease (AD) cases with at least one assessment after diagnosis, originating from 31 AD centres from the United States. Trajectories of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes (CDR-sb) were modelled jointly over time using parallel-process growth mixture models in order to identify latent classes of trajectories. Bias-corrected multinomial logistic regression was used to identify baseline predictors of class membership and compare these with the predictors found in the Cache County Dementia Progression Study.
The best-fitting model contained 3 classes: Class 1 was the largest (63%) and showed the slowest progression on both MMSE and CDR-sb; classes 2 (22%) and 3 (15%) showed moderate and rapid worsening, respectively. Significant predictors of membership in classes 2 and 3, relative to class 1, were worse baseline MMSE and CDR-sb, higher education, and lack of hypertension. Combining all previously mentioned predictors yielded areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 and 0.75 for classes 2 and 3, respectively, relative to class 1.
Our replication study confirmed that it is possible to predict trajectories of progression in AD with relatively good accuracy. The class distribution was comparable with that of the original study, with most individuals being members of a class with stable or slow progression. This is important for informing newly diagnosed AD patients and their caregivers.
我们试图使用来自美国 31 个阿尔茨海默病中心的全国阿尔茨海默病协调中心的临床队列复制先前在 Cache County 痴呆进展研究中发表的用于进展预测的模型。
我们纳入了 1120 例阿尔茨海默病(AD)首发患者,这些患者在诊断后至少进行了一次评估。轨迹的微型精神状态检查(MMSE)和临床痴呆评定总和量表(CDR-sb)使用平行过程增长混合模型进行联合建模,以识别轨迹的潜在类别。偏倚校正的多项逻辑回归用于识别类别成员的基线预测因素,并将这些预测因素与 Cache County 痴呆进展研究中的预测因素进行比较。
最佳拟合模型包含 3 个类别:第 1 类(63%)是最大的类别,在 MMSE 和 CDR-sb 上的进展最慢;第 2 类(22%)和第 3 类(15%)的进展分别为中度和快速恶化。与第 1 类相比,第 2 类和第 3 类成员的显著预测因素是基线 MMSE 和 CDR-sb 较差、受教育程度较高以及没有高血压。将所有提到的预测因素结合起来,第 2 类和第 3 类的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.70 和 0.75,与第 1 类相比。
我们的复制研究证实,使用相对较好的准确性预测 AD 进展轨迹是可能的。类别的分布与原始研究相似,大多数患者是稳定或进展缓慢的类别的成员。这对于告知新诊断的 AD 患者及其护理人员非常重要。