• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Validity and Reliability of Turkish Male Breast Self-Examination Instrument.土耳其男性乳房自我检查工具的效度与信度
Eur J Breast Health. 2018 Feb 15;14(2):121-126. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2018.3760. eCollection 2018 Apr 1.
2
Reliability and Validity of a Turkish version of the Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale.土耳其语版产前母乳喂养自我效能量表的信效度
Midwifery. 2018 Sep;64:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 18.
3
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale.《孕产妇产前依恋量表》土耳其语版本的效度与信度
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2015 Apr;12(2):154-61. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12052. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
4
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the pressure ulcer prevention knowledge assessment instrument.压力性溃疡预防知识评估工具土耳其语版本的效度和信度
J Tissue Viability. 2016 Nov;25(4):201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
5
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire.土耳其慢性疼痛接纳问卷的有效性和可靠性。
Balkan Med J. 2018 May 29;35(3):238-244. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2016.1998.
6
Evaluating the validity and reliability of the V-scale instrument (Turkish version) used to determine nurses' attitudes towards vital sign monitoring.评估用于确定护士对生命体征监测态度的V量表工具(土耳其语版本)的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2018 Jun;24(3):e12637. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12637. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
7
The West Haven Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory: Reliability and validity of the Turkish version in individuals with cancer.西黑文耶鲁多维疼痛量表:土耳其语版本在癌症患者中的信度和效度
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Feb;20:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
8
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument.土耳其版密歇根神经病变筛查工具的有效性和可靠性。
Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Jun 23;50(4):789-797. doi: 10.3906/sag-1906-63.
9
Validity and reliability study of the pediatric Rome III questionnaire for Turkish children and adolescents.土耳其儿童和青少年版罗马III问卷的效度与信度研究
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;27(2):129-35. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2016.15148.
10
The Turkish adaptation of scale to measure patient perceptions of the quality of nursing care and related hospital services: A validity and reliability study.用于衡量患者对护理质量及相关医院服务认知的量表的土耳其语改编版:一项效度与信度研究。
North Clin Istanb. 2017 Jan 25;3(3):187-193. doi: 10.14744/nci.2016.42650. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
'Marginalised malignancies': A qualitative synthesis of men's accounts of living with breast cancer.“边缘化的恶性肿瘤”:对男性乳腺癌患者生活经历描述的质性综合分析
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jan;149:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.032. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
2
Perspectives and Attitudes of Jordanian Male College Students on Breast Cancer Screening.约旦男大学生对乳腺癌筛查的看法和态度
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Mar;32(1):24-30. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0909-x.
3
Awareness of Risk Factors for Breast, Lung and Cervical Cancer in a UK Student Population.英国学生群体对乳腺癌、肺癌和宫颈癌风险因素的认知
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):660-3. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0770-3.
4
Validity evidence based on test content.基于测试内容的效度证据。
Psicothema. 2014;26(1):100-7. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.256.
5
Perceptions and opinions about male breast cancer and male breast self-examination: a qualitative study.关于男性乳腺癌和男性乳房自我检查的认知与看法:一项定性研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(1):243-6. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.1.243.
6
Outcome of non-metastatic male breast cancer: 118 patients.非转移性男性乳腺癌的结局:118 例患者。
Med Oncol. 2012 Jun;29(2):554-60. doi: 10.1007/s12032-011-9978-9. Epub 2011 May 15.
7
THE DUAL-FOCUS APPROACH TO CREATING BILINGUAL MEASURES.创建双语测评的双焦点方法。
J Cross Cult Psychol. 1999 Mar;30(2):206-218. doi: 10.1177/0022022199030002004.
8
Original Research: Men's awareness and knowledge of male breast cancer.原始研究:男性对男性乳腺癌的认知和了解。
Am J Nurs. 2010 Oct;110(10):32-7, 39-40; quiz 41-2. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000389672.93605.2f.
9
Male breast cancer: risk factors, diagnosis, and management (Review).男性乳腺癌:危险因素、诊断和治疗(综述)。
Oncol Rep. 2010 Nov;24(5):1115-20. doi: 10.3892/or_00000962.
10
Male breast cancer: a population-based comparison with female breast cancer.男性乳腺癌:与女性乳腺癌的基于人群的比较。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 10;28(2):232-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8162. Epub 2009 Dec 7.

土耳其男性乳房自我检查工具的效度与信度

Validity and Reliability of Turkish Male Breast Self-Examination Instrument.

作者信息

Erkin Özüm, Göl İlknur

机构信息

Department of Public Health Nursing, Ege University School of Nursing, İzmir, Turkey.

Department of Public Health Nursing, Çankırı Karatekin University School of Health Sciences, Çankırı, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Breast Health. 2018 Feb 15;14(2):121-126. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2018.3760. eCollection 2018 Apr 1.

DOI:10.5152/ejbh.2018.3760
PMID:29774322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5939976/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to measure the validity and reliability of Turkish male breast self-examination (MBSE) instrument.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The methodological study was performed in 2016 at Ege University, Faculty of Nursing, İzmir, Turkey. The MBSE includes ten steps. For validity studies, face validity, content validity, and construct validity (exploratory factor analysis) were done. For reliability study, Kuder Richardson was calculated.

RESULTS

The content validity index was found to be 0.94. Kendall W coefficient was 0.80 (p=0.551). The total variance explained by the two factors was found to be 63.24%. Kuder Richardson 21 was done for reliability study and found to be 0.97 for the instrument. The final instrument included 10 steps and two stages.

CONCLUSIONS

The Turkish version of MBSE is a valid and reliable instrument for early diagnose. The MBSE can be used in Turkish speaking countries and cultures with two stages and 10 steps.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估土耳其男性乳房自我检查(MBSE)工具的有效性和可靠性。

材料与方法

2016年在土耳其伊兹密尔的伊兹密尔埃杰大学护理学院进行了方法学研究。MBSE包括十个步骤。进行了效度研究,包括表面效度、内容效度和结构效度(探索性因素分析)。进行了信度研究,计算了库德-理查森系数。

结果

内容效度指数为0.94。肯德尔W系数为0.80(p = 0.551)。两个因素解释的总方差为63.24%。进行了库德-理查森21信度研究,该工具的信度为0.97。最终工具包括10个步骤和两个阶段。

结论

土耳其语版的MBSE是一种用于早期诊断的有效且可靠的工具。MBSE可用于讲土耳其语的国家和文化,分为两个阶段,共10个步骤。