• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Increases in Sugary Drink Marketing During Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Benefit Issuance in New York.纽约补充营养援助计划发放期间含糖饮料营销增加。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jul;55(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
2
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program issuance timing is associated with sugar-sweetened beverage marketing in the USA.补充营养援助计划的发放时间与美国含糖饮料的营销有关。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Sep 23;27(1):e167. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024001563.
3
Grocery store beverage choices by participants in federal food assistance and nutrition programs.参与联邦食品援助和营养计划的人员在杂货店的饮料选择。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Oct;43(4):411-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.015.
4
Sugary Drink Consumption Among Children by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Status.儿童通过补充营养援助计划摄入含糖饮料的情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jan;58(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.08.033. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
5
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Demand and Tax Simulation for Federal Food Assistance Participants: A Case of Two New England States.含糖饮料需求与联邦食品援助计划参与者税收模拟:新英格兰两州案例
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Aug;16(4):549-558. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0399-1.
6
Nutritional profile of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program household food and beverage purchases.补充营养援助计划家庭食品和饮料购买的营养状况
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;105(6):1433-1442. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.147173. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
7
Changes in Beverage Marketing at Stores Following the Oakland Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.《奥克兰含糖饮料税实施后商店饮料营销的变化》
Am J Prev Med. 2020 May;58(5):648-656. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.12.014. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
8
Supplemental nutrition assistance program participation and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, overall and by source.补充营养援助计划的参与情况以及含糖饮料的消费情况,总体情况及按来源划分的情况。
Prev Med. 2015 Dec;81:82-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
9
Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Dietary Behaviors: Role of Community Food Environment.参与补充营养援助计划与饮食行为:社区食物环境的作用。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Jun;119(6):934-943.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.11.021. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
10
Tobacco Marketing at SNAP- and WIC-Authorized Retail Food Stores in the United States.美国 SNAP 和 WIC 授权零售食品店的烟草营销。
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Aug;46(4):541-549. doi: 10.1177/1090198119831759. Epub 2019 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program issuance timing is associated with sugar-sweetened beverage marketing in the USA.补充营养援助计划的发放时间与美国含糖饮料的营销有关。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Sep 23;27(1):e167. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024001563.
2
Support for Policies and Strategies to Promote Healthy Food Retail In-Store and Online: Perspectives From a National Sample of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participants.支持促进健康食品店内和在线零售的政策和策略:来自补充营养援助计划参与者全国样本的观点。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024 Oct;56(10):681-693. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2024.06.001. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
3
Philadelphia Beverage Tax's Impact on Beverage Ad Expenditures and Number of Ads Purchased.费城饮料税对饮料广告支出和购买广告数量的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Aug;67(2):274-281. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.03.011. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
4
Importance of Nutrition Security to CVD Prevention Efforts in the USA.营养安全对美国 CVD 预防工作的重要性。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2023 May;25(5):219-230. doi: 10.1007/s11883-023-01097-z. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
5
In-Store Marketing and Supermarket Purchases: Associations Overall and by Transaction SNAP Status.店内营销与超市购物:总体关联度及交易 SNAP 状况。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Oct;65(4):587-595. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.02.029. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
6
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)-authorised store marketing environments in Louisiana encourage the selection of less nutritious foods and beverages.路易斯安那州的补充营养援助计划(SNAP)授权商店营销环境鼓励选择营养成分较低的食品和饮料。
J Nutr Sci. 2022 Aug 4;11:e64. doi: 10.1017/jns.2022.60. eCollection 2022.
7
Beverage Availability and Price: Variations by Neighborhood Poverty Level in New York City.饮料供应与价格:纽约市不同邻里贫困水平的差异
Health Equity. 2022 Apr 27;6(1):322-329. doi: 10.1089/heq.2021.0069. eCollection 2022.
8
The Racialized Marketing of Unhealthy Foods and Beverages: Perspectives and Potential Remedies.种族主义化的不健康食品和饮料营销:观点与潜在对策。
J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(1):52-59. doi: 10.1017/jme.2022.8.
9
Improving Healthy Food Choices in Low-Income Settings in the United States Using Behavioral Economic-Based Adaptations to Choice Architecture.利用基于行为经济学的选择架构调整措施改善美国低收入地区的健康食品选择
Front Nutr. 2021 Oct 6;8:734991. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.734991. eCollection 2021.
10
Philadelphia's Excise Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Benefit Redemption.费城对含糖和人工甜味饮料征收的消费税以及补充营养援助计划福利兑换。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Nov;111(11):1986-1996. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306464. Epub 2021 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Obesity Prevention in the Supermarket-Choice Architecture and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.超市中的肥胖预防——选择架构与补充营养援助计划
Am J Public Health. 2017 Oct;107(10):1582-1583. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303991.
2
Transactions at a Northeastern Supermarket Chain: Differences by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Use.东北某连锁超市交易情况:补充营养援助计划使用情况的差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Oct;53(4):e131-e138. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
3
The Influence of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Warnings: A Randomized Trial of Adolescents' Choices and Beliefs.含糖饮料警告的影响:青少年选择与信念的随机试验
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):664-672. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
4
Effects of plain packaging, warning labels, and taxes on young people's predicted sugar-sweetened beverage preferences: an experimental study.普通包装、警示标签和税收对年轻人预测的含糖饮料偏好的影响:一项实验研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Sep 1;13(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0421-7.
5
Nutrition Assistance Programs: Cause or Solution to Obesity.营养援助计划:肥胖的成因还是解决方案。
Curr Obes Rep. 2016 Jun;5(2):176-83. doi: 10.1007/s13679-016-0207-x.
6
Associations between retail food store exterior advertisements and community demographic and socioeconomic composition.零售食品店外部广告与社区人口统计学和社会经济构成之间的关联。
Health Place. 2016 May;39:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
7
The Influence of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Labels on Parents' Choices.含糖饮料健康警示标签对家长选择的影响。
Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20153185. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3185. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
8
Regulating Tobacco Product Advertising and Promotions in the Retail Environment: A Roadmap for States and Localities.规范零售环境中的烟草产品广告与促销:州和地方的路线图。
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Winter;43(4):878-96. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12326.
9
Outstanding Questions In First Amendment Law Related To Food Labeling Disclosure Requirements For Health.与食品健康标签披露要求相关的第一修正案法律中的悬而未决问题。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Nov;34(11):1986-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0616.
10
The Relationship Between Obesity and Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): Is Mental Health a Mediator?肥胖与参与补充营养援助计划(SNAP)之间的关系:心理健康是中介因素吗?
J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2014 Oct 1;9(4):512-522. doi: 10.1080/19320248.2014.962780.

纽约补充营养援助计划发放期间含糖饮料营销增加。

Increases in Sugary Drink Marketing During Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Benefit Issuance in New York.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jul;55(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.012
PMID:29776786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6128139/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest federal food assistance program, providing $67 billion in benefits to 44 million Americans. Some states distribute SNAP benefits over one or a few days each month, which may create an incentive for retailers to heavily promote top-selling products, like sugar-sweetened beverages, when benefits are disbursed.

METHODS

A beverage environment scan assessing presence of displays, advertisements, and price promotions for sugar-sweetened, low-calorie, and unsweetened beverages was administered in a census of SNAP-authorized beverage retailers (n=630) in three cities in New York from September to November 2011. Multilevel regression models controlling for store type; county; and percentage SNAP enrollment, poverty, and non-Hispanic white population in the store's census tract were used to estimate the odds of in-store beverage marketing during the SNAP benefit issuance period compared to other days of the month. Data were analyzed in 2016.

RESULTS

There were higher odds of in-store sugar-sweetened beverage marketing during SNAP benefit issuance days (first to ninth days of the month) compared with other days of the month, particularly for sugar-sweetened beverage advertisements (OR=1.66, 95% CI=1.01, 2.72) and displays (OR=1.88, 95% CI=1.16, 3.03). In census tracts with high SNAP enrollment (>28%), the odds of a retailer having sugar-sweetened beverage displays were 4.35 times higher (95% CI=1.93, 9.98) during issuance compared with non-issuance days. There were no differences in marketing for low-calorie or unsweetened beverages.

CONCLUSIONS

Increases in sugar-sweetened beverage marketing during issuance may exacerbate disparities in diet quality of households participating in SNAP. Policy changes, like extending SNAP benefit issuance, may mitigate these effects.

摘要

简介

补充营养援助计划(SNAP)是最大的联邦食品援助计划,为 4400 万美国人提供了 670 亿美元的福利。一些州每月在一到几天内分配 SNAP 福利,这可能会促使零售商在发放福利时大力推广畅销产品,如含糖饮料。

方法

在 2011 年 9 月至 11 月期间,对纽约市的三个城市中的 630 家获得 SNAP 授权的饮料零售商进行了一项饮料环境扫描调查,评估了展示、广告和价格促销活动的存在情况,这些饮料包括含糖、低热量和无糖饮料。使用多层回归模型,控制了商店类型、县、SNAP 参与率、贫困率和商店所在普查区的非西班牙裔白人人口比例,来估计在 SNAP 福利发放期间与当月其他日子相比,店内饮料营销的几率。数据于 2016 年进行了分析。

结果

与当月其他日子相比,在 SNAP 福利发放日(月初的第 1 至 9 天),店内含糖饮料营销的几率更高,特别是含糖饮料广告(OR=1.66,95%CI=1.01,2.72)和展示(OR=1.88,95%CI=1.16,3.03)。在 SNAP 参与率较高(>28%)的普查区,与非发放日相比,零售商在发放日展示含糖饮料的几率高 4.35 倍(95%CI=1.93,9.98)。低热量或无糖饮料的营销没有差异。

结论

在发放福利期间,含糖饮料营销的增加可能会加剧参与 SNAP 的家庭在饮食质量方面的差异。政策变化,如延长 SNAP 福利发放时间,可能会减轻这些影响。