NICM Health Research Institute, University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown, Sydney, NSW, 2560, Australia.
Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 May 19;20(6):44. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0910-2.
This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the efficacy, limitations, and future of e-health treatments for anxiety. Within this, we provide detail on "first-generation" e-health approaches, such as computerized therapies. Additionally, we assess the emergence and early efficacy of newer methods of treatment delivery, including smartphone apps and virtual reality interventions, discussing the potential and pitfalls for each.
There is now substantial clinical research demonstrating the efficacy of internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of anxiety. However, the ability of these interventions for engaging patients in "real-world" settings is unclear. Recently, smartphone apps for anxiety have presented a more popular and ubiquitous method of intervention delivery, although the evidence base supporting these newer approaches drastically falls behind the extensive marketing and commercialization efforts currently driving their development. Meanwhile, the increasing availability of novel technologies, such as "virtual reality" (VR), introduces further potential of e-health treatments for generalized anxiety and anxiety-related disorders such as phobias and obsessive compulsive disorder, while also creating additional challenges for research. Although still in its infancy, e-health research is already presenting several promising avenues for delivering effective and scalable treatments for anxiety. Nonetheless, several important steps must be taken in order for academic research to keep pace with continued technological advances.
本篇综述旨在全面概述焦虑症的电子健康治疗的疗效、局限性和未来。在此基础上,我们详细介绍了“第一代”电子健康方法,如计算机疗法。此外,我们评估了新的治疗方法的出现和早期疗效,包括智能手机应用程序和虚拟现实干预,讨论了每种方法的潜力和陷阱。
现在有大量的临床研究表明,互联网提供的认知行为疗法在治疗焦虑症方面是有效的。然而,这些干预措施在现实环境中吸引患者的能力尚不清楚。最近,用于焦虑症的智能手机应用程序提供了一种更流行和无处不在的干预方式,尽管支持这些新方法的证据基础远远落后于当前推动其发展的广泛营销和商业化努力。与此同时,新技术的日益普及,如“虚拟现实”(VR),为广泛性焦虑症和焦虑相关障碍(如恐惧症和强迫症)的电子健康治疗带来了更多的潜力,同时也为研究带来了额外的挑战。尽管还处于起步阶段,但电子健康研究已经为焦虑症提供了一些有前途的有效和可扩展的治疗途径。尽管如此,为了使学术研究跟上技术进步的步伐,还必须采取几个重要步骤。