Finn Saoirse, Fancourt Daisy
Centre for Performance Science, Royal College of Music, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Prog Brain Res. 2018;237:173-200. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 May 1.
This systematic review explored the evidence base on the impact of listening to music on biological response in both clinical and nonclinical settings. Human studies exploring the effects of listening to recorded music on biological markers were included. Studies had to involve a non-music control condition. Keyword searches were carried out of five major databases (Cochrane/Wiley, PsycINFO, PubMed, Sage, and Science Direct) and bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Studies (RoB 2.0). Forty-four studies assessing the biological impact of music listening were identified: 27 in clinical settings and 17 in nonclinical settings. Eighty-two percent had examined the effects of short-term listening interventions, while the remainder had looked at longitudinal interventions. Thirteen of 33 biomarkers tested were reported to change in response to listening to music. The most commonly analyzed biomarker was the stress hormone cortisol, with half of clinical studies demonstrating a stress-reducing effect of music listening. Blood glucose was also found repeatedly to reduce in response to music listening. Many of the other biomarkers analyzed are also part of biological stress pathways, which suggests that the primary way by which music listening affects us biologically is via modulations of stress response. Effects were shown irrespective of genre, self-selection of the music, or duration of listening, although a majority did use classical music. The evidence base for understanding biological responses to music is still developing, but there is support for the application of listening to music, especially within clinical settings for stress reduction.
本系统评价探讨了在临床和非临床环境中,聆听音乐对生物反应影响的证据基础。纳入了探索聆听录制音乐对生物标志物影响的人体研究。研究必须包含非音乐对照条件。对五个主要数据库(Cochrane/Wiley、PsycINFO、PubMed、Sage和ScienceDirect)进行了关键词检索,并使用Cochrane随机研究偏倚风险工具(RoB 2.0)评估偏倚。共识别出44项评估聆听音乐生物影响的研究:27项在临床环境中,17项在非临床环境中。82%的研究考察了短期聆听干预的效果,其余研究则关注纵向干预。在测试的33种生物标志物中,有13种据报道会因聆听音乐而发生变化。最常分析的生物标志物是应激激素皮质醇,一半的临床研究表明聆听音乐具有减轻压力的作用。还反复发现血糖会因聆听音乐而降低。分析的许多其他生物标志物也是生物应激途径的一部分,这表明聆听音乐在生物学上影响我们的主要方式是通过调节应激反应。无论音乐类型、音乐的自我选择或聆听时长如何,均显示出相应效果,尽管大多数研究使用的是古典音乐。理解音乐生物反应的证据基础仍在发展,但支持将聆听音乐应用于实践,尤其是在临床环境中用于减轻压力。