Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Danish Research Centre for Migration Ethnicity and Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Section of Immigrant Medicine, Department of Infectious Disease, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jul;18(7):796-811. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30219-6. Epub 2018 May 17.
BACKGROUND: Rates of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are rising globally and there is concern that increased migration is contributing to the burden of antibiotic resistance in Europe. However, the effect of migration on the burden of AMR in Europe has not yet been comprehensively examined. Therefore, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and synthesise data for AMR carriage or infection in migrants to Europe to examine differences in patterns of AMR across migrant groups and in different settings. METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus with no language restrictions from Jan 1, 2000, to Jan 18, 2017, for primary data from observational studies reporting antibacterial resistance in common bacterial pathogens among migrants to 21 European Union-15 and European Economic Area countries. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to report data on carriage or infection with laboratory-confirmed antibiotic-resistant organisms in migrant populations. We extracted data from eligible studies and assessed quality using piloted, standardised forms. We did not examine drug resistance in tuberculosis and excluded articles solely reporting on this parameter. We also excluded articles in which migrant status was determined by ethnicity, country of birth of participants' parents, or was not defined, and articles in which data were not disaggregated by migrant status. Outcomes were carriage of or infection with antibiotic-resistant organisms. We used random-effects models to calculate the pooled prevalence of each outcome. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42016043681. FINDINGS: We identified 2274 articles, of which 23 observational studies reporting on antibiotic resistance in 2319 migrants were included. The pooled prevalence of any AMR carriage or AMR infection in migrants was 25·4% (95% CI 19·1-31·8; I =98%), including meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (7·8%, 4·8-10·7; I =92%) and antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (27·2%, 17·6-36·8; I =94%). The pooled prevalence of any AMR carriage or infection was higher in refugees and asylum seekers (33·0%, 18·3-47·6; I =98%) than in other migrant groups (6·6%, 1·8-11·3; I =92%). The pooled prevalence of antibiotic-resistant organisms was slightly higher in high-migrant community settings (33·1%, 11·1-55·1; I =96%) than in migrants in hospitals (24·3%, 16·1-32·6; I =98%). We did not find evidence of high rates of transmission of AMR from migrant to host populations. INTERPRETATION: Migrants are exposed to conditions favouring the emergence of drug resistance during transit and in host countries in Europe. Increased antibiotic resistance among refugees and asylum seekers and in high-migrant community settings (such as refugee camps and detention facilities) highlights the need for improved living conditions, access to health care, and initiatives to facilitate detection of and appropriate high-quality treatment for antibiotic-resistant infections during transit and in host countries. Protocols for the prevention and control of infection and for antibiotic surveillance need to be integrated in all aspects of health care, which should be accessible for all migrant groups, and should target determinants of AMR before, during, and after migration. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College Healthcare Charity, the Wellcome Trust, and UK National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-associated Infections and Antimictobial Resistance at Imperial College London.
背景:全球范围内抗生素耐药率(AMR)不断上升,人们担心移民增加正在导致欧洲抗生素耐药的负担加重。然而,移民对欧洲 AMR 负担的影响尚未得到全面研究。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定和综合有关移民到欧洲的 AMR 携带或感染的数据,以检查移民群体之间以及不同环境中 AMR 模式的差异。
方法:为了进行这项系统评价和荟萃分析,我们在 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 1 月 18 日期间,在 MEDLINE、Embase、PubMed 和 Scopus 上进行了无语言限制的检索,以获取有关 21 个欧盟-15 和欧洲经济区国家移民中常见细菌病原体的抗菌耐药性的观察性研究的原始数据。为了纳入研究,研究必须报告移民人群中实验室确认的耐药生物体的携带或感染的数据。我们从合格的研究中提取数据,并使用试点、标准化表格评估质量。我们没有检查结核病中的耐药性,并排除仅报告该参数的文章。我们还排除了移民身份由参与者父母的种族、出生国或未定义决定的文章,以及未按移民身份分类的数据的文章。结果是携带或感染抗生素耐药的生物体。我们使用随机效应模型计算每个结果的合并流行率。研究方案在 PROSPERO 中注册,编号 CRD42016043681。
发现:我们确定了 2274 篇文章,其中包括 23 项关于移民抗生素耐药性的观察性研究,涉及 2319 名移民。移民中任何 AMR 携带或 AMR 感染的合并流行率为 25.4%(95%CI 19.1-31.8;I = 98%),包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(7.8%,4.8-10.7;I = 92%)和抗生素耐药革兰氏阴性菌(27.2%,17.6-36.8;I = 94%)。难民和寻求庇护者中任何 AMR 携带或感染的合并流行率(33.0%,18.3-47.6;I = 98%)高于其他移民群体(6.6%,1.8-11.3;I = 92%)。在高移民社区环境(33.1%,11.1-55.1;I = 96%)中,抗生素耐药生物体的合并流行率略高于医院中的移民(24.3%,16.1-32.6;I = 98%)。我们没有发现 AMR 从移民传播给宿主人群的高比率的证据。
解释:移民在过境和欧洲东道国期间接触到有利于耐药性出现的条件。难民和寻求庇护者以及高移民社区环境(如难民营和拘留设施)中抗生素耐药性的增加突出表明,需要改善生活条件、获得医疗保健的机会,并采取措施,促进在过境和东道国期间检测和适当治疗抗生素耐药性感染。感染预防和控制以及抗生素监测的方案需要整合到所有方面的医疗保健中,这些方案应该对所有移民群体都可及,并应针对移民前、期间和之后 AMR 的决定因素。
资金:英国国家健康研究所帝国生物医学研究中心、帝国学院医疗慈善机构、惠康信托基金和英国国家健康研究所伦敦帝国学院医疗保健相关感染和抗生素耐药性健康保护研究单位。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018-5-17
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018-5-16
BMC Public Health. 2025-5-15
North Clin Istanb. 2025-6-23
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025-6-30
BMC Public Health. 2025-5-15
Nat Microbiol. 2025-4
Ann Glob Health. 2025-3-6
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018-3
Pathog Glob Health. 2017-6
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2016-8-9
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016-11
Epidemiol Infect. 2016-8
Internist (Berl). 2016-5