• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体对个体社会责任态度的影响。

Group Effects on Individual Attitudes Toward Social Responsibility.

作者信息

Secchi Davide, Bui Hong T M

机构信息

1COMAC Research Cluster, Centre for Human Interactivity (CHI), Department of Language and Communication, University of Southern Denmark, Sdr. Stationvej 28, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark.

2Southampton Management School, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK.

出版信息

J Bus Ethics. 2018;149(3):725-746. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3106-x. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1007/s10551-016-3106-x
PMID:29780191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5956040/
Abstract

This study uses a quasi-experimental design to investigate what happens to individual socially responsible attitudes when they are exposed to group dynamics. Findings show that group engagement increases individual attitudes toward social responsibility. We also found that individuals with attitudes toward social responsibility are likely to change their opinions when group members show more positive attitudes toward social responsibility. Conversely, individuals with attitudes do not change much, independent of group characteristics. To better analyze the effect of group dynamics, the study proposes to split social responsibility into and components. Findings show that social responsibility is correlated with but different from social responsibility although the latter is more susceptible than the former to group dynamics.

摘要

本研究采用准实验设计来调查个体在接触群体动态时其社会责任态度会发生什么变化。研究结果表明,群体参与会增强个体对社会责任的态度。我们还发现,当群体成员对社会责任表现出更积极的态度时,具有社会责任态度的个体更有可能改变他们的观点。相反,持消极态度的个体则变化不大,与群体特征无关。为了更好地分析群体动态的影响,该研究建议将社会责任分为两个组成部分。研究结果表明,内在社会责任与外在社会责任相关但不同,尽管外在社会责任比内在社会责任更容易受到群体动态的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e69/5956040/c3642822b7da/10551_2016_3106_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e69/5956040/543929f72284/10551_2016_3106_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e69/5956040/6eadf97235b3/10551_2016_3106_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e69/5956040/c3642822b7da/10551_2016_3106_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e69/5956040/543929f72284/10551_2016_3106_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e69/5956040/6eadf97235b3/10551_2016_3106_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e69/5956040/c3642822b7da/10551_2016_3106_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Group Effects on Individual Attitudes Toward Social Responsibility.群体对个体社会责任态度的影响。
J Bus Ethics. 2018;149(3):725-746. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3106-x. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
2
Socialization or social structure: investigating predictors of attitudes toward filial responsibility among Chinese urban youth from one- and multiple-child families.社会化或社会结构:调查来自独生子女家庭和多子女家庭的中国城市青年对孝道责任态度的预测因素。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2004;59(2):105-24. doi: 10.2190/VL4K-HLNU-N0M4-F9RP.
3
The effects of knowledge of child development and social-emotional maturity on adolescent attitudes toward parenting.儿童发展知识和社会情感成熟度对青少年育儿态度的影响。
Adolescence. 1985 Winter;20(80):823-39.
4
Effects of responsibility attribution and message source on young adults' health attitudes and behaviors.责任归因和信息来源对年轻人健康态度和行为的影响。
J Health Commun. 2013;18(7):881-94. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.757389. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
5
Medical students' attitudes toward providing care for the underserved. Are we training socially responsible physicians?医学生对为弱势群体提供医疗服务的态度。我们培养的是对社会负责的医生吗?
JAMA. 1993 May 19;269(19):2519-23.
6
Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups.右翼威权主义和社会支配取向对外群体态度的差异影响及其通过来自外群体的威胁和与外群体的竞争所起的中介作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):684-96. doi: 10.1177/0146167205284282.
7
Trauma and PTSD symptoms in Rwanda: implications for attitudes toward justice and reconciliation.卢旺达的创伤与创伤后应激障碍症状:对司法与和解态度的影响
JAMA. 2004 Aug 4;292(5):602-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.5.602.
8
Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public.对生物技术的态度:评估信息更灵通的公众的意见。
New Genet Soc. 2005 Apr;24(1):31-56. doi: 10.1080/14636770500037693.
9
Peer group socialization of homophobic attitudes and behavior during adolescence.青少年时期同伴群体对恐同态度和行为的社会化影响。
Child Dev. 2007 Nov-Dec;78(6):1830-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01101.x.
10
The value "social responsibility" as a motivating factor for adolescents' readiness to participate in different types of political actions, and its socialization in parent and peer contexts.“社会责任”作为激励青少年准备参与不同类型政治行动的因素的价值,及其在父母和同伴环境中的社会化。
J Adolesc. 2012 Jun;35(3):533-47. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical Attitudes toward COVID-19 Passports: Evidences from Spain.对 COVID-19 护照的伦理态度:来自西班牙的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 11;18(24):13098. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413098.

本文引用的文献

1
Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.社会科学研究中方法偏差的来源及控制方法建议。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539-69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
2
Samples in applied psychology: over a decade of research in review.应用心理学中的样本:十余年研究综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Sep;96(5):1055-64. doi: 10.1037/a0023322.
3
A personality scale for social responsibility.一份社会责任人格量表。
J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1952 Jan;47(1):73-80. doi: 10.1037/h0062924.
4
Group performance and decision making.团队绩效与决策制定。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:623-55. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009.
5
AFFECTING THE SALIENCE OF THE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY NORM: EFFECTS OF PAST HELP ON THE RESPONSE TO DEPENDENCY RELATIONSHIPS.影响社会责任规范的显著性:过去的帮助对依赖关系反应的影响
J Abnorm Psychol. 1964 Mar;68:275-81. doi: 10.1037/h0040164.
6
The measurement of responsibility in children.儿童责任感的测量。
Child Dev. 1954 Mar;25(1):21-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1954.tb04739.x.
7
The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy.企业慈善事业的竞争优势。
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Dec;80(12):56-68, 133.
8
The statistical analysis of data from small groups.来自小群体数据的统计分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jul;83(1):126-37.
9
Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis.业务部门层面员工满意度、员工敬业度与业务成果之间的关系:一项元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Apr;87(2):268-79. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268.