Srimathi Sundari Subramanian, Department of Visual Psychophysics, Elite School of Optometry; Binocular Vision Clinic, Sankara Nethralaya, Units of Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Srimathi Sundari Subramanian, Department of Visual Psychophysics, Elite School of Optometry, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;66(6):799-805. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1115_17.
Variant myopia (VM) presents as a discrepancy of >1 diopter (D) between subjective and objective refraction, without the presence of any accommodative dysfunction. The purpose of this study is to create a clinical profile of VM.
Fourteen eyes of 12 VM patients who had a discrepancy of >1D between retinoscopy and subjective acceptance under both cycloplegic and noncycloplegic conditions were included in the study. Fourteen eyes of 14 age- and refractive error-matched participants served as controls. Potential participants underwent a comprehensive orthoptic examination followed by retinoscopy (Ret), closed-field autorefractor (CA), subjective acceptance (SA), choroidal and retinal thickness, ocular biometry, and higher order spherical aberrations measurements.
In the VM eyes, a statistically and clinically significant difference was noted between the Ret and CA and Ret and SA under both cycloplegic and noncycloplegic conditions (multivariate repeated measures analysis of variance, P < 0.0001). A statistically significant difference was observed between the VM eyes, non-VM eyes, and controls for choroidal thickness in all the quadrants (Univariate ANOVA P < 0.05). The VM eyes had thinner choroids (197.21 ± 13.04 μ) compared to the non-VM eyes (249.25 ± 53.70 μ) and refractive error-matched controls (264.62 ± 12.53 μ). No statistically significant differences between groups in root mean square of total higher order aberrations and spherical aberration were observed.
Accommodative etiology does not play a role in the refractive discrepancy seen in individuals with the variant myopic presentation. These individuals have thinner choroids in the eye with variant myopic presentation compared to the fellow eyes and controls. Hypotheses and clinical implications of variant myopia are discussed.
变异近视(VM)表现为客观和主观验光之间相差>1 屈光度(D),且不存在任何调节功能障碍。本研究旨在建立 VM 的临床特征。
本研究纳入了 12 例 VM 患者的 14 只眼,这些患者在睫状肌麻痹和非睫状肌麻痹状态下,视网膜检影和主观接受之间存在>1D 的差异。14 只年龄和屈光不正匹配的正常眼作为对照组。潜在的参与者接受了全面的斜视检查,然后进行视网膜检影(Ret)、闭路自动折射仪(CA)、主观接受(SA)、脉络膜和视网膜厚度、眼球生物测量和高阶球差测量。
在 VM 眼中,在睫状肌麻痹和非睫状肌麻痹状态下,Ret 和 CA 以及 Ret 和 SA 之间存在统计学和临床意义上的显著差异(多变量重复测量方差分析,P<0.0001)。在 VM 眼、非 VM 眼和对照组之间,所有象限的脉络膜厚度均存在统计学显著差异(单因素方差分析 P<0.05)。VM 眼的脉络膜比非 VM 眼(249.25±53.70μm)和屈光不正匹配的对照组(264.62±12.53μm)更薄(197.21±13.04μm)。各组间总高阶像差和球差的均方根差异无统计学意义。
在具有变异近视表现的个体中,调节病因在其屈光差异中不起作用。与对侧眼和对照组相比,具有变异近视表现的眼中脉络膜更薄。讨论了变异近视的假设和临床意义。