1 QIMP Group, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
2 Department of Radiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, The Detroit Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019 Aug;39(8):1516-1530. doi: 10.1177/0271678X18776820. Epub 2018 May 23.
Absolute quantification of PET brain imaging requires the measurement of an arterial input function (AIF), typically obtained invasively via an arterial cannulation. We present an approach to automatically calculate an image-derived input function (IDIF) and cerebral metabolic rates of glucose (CMRGlc) from the [18F]FDG PET data using an integrated PET/MRI system. Ten healthy controls underwent test-retest dynamic [18F]FDG-PET/MRI examinations. The imaging protocol consisted of a 60-min PET list-mode acquisition together with a time-of-flight MR angiography scan for segmenting the carotid arteries and intermittent MR navigators to monitor subject movement. AIFs were collected as the reference standard. Attenuation correction was performed using a separate low-dose CT scan. Assessment of the percentage difference between area-under-the-curve of IDIF and AIF yielded values within ±5%. Similar test-retest variability was seen between AIFs (9 ± 8) % and the IDIFs (9 ± 7) %. Absolute percentage difference between CMRGlc values obtained from AIF and IDIF across all examinations and selected brain regions was 3.2% (interquartile range: (2.4-4.3) %, maximum < 10%). High test-retest intravariability was observed between CMRGlc values obtained from AIF (14%) and IDIF (17%). The proposed approach provides an IDIF, which can be effectively used in lieu of AIF.
正电子发射断层扫描(PET)脑成像的绝对定量需要测量动脉输入函数(AIF),通常通过动脉插管进行侵入性测量。我们提出了一种使用集成的 PET/MRI 系统从 [18F]FDG PET 数据自动计算图像衍生输入函数(IDIF)和脑葡萄糖代谢率(CMRGlc)的方法。十名健康对照者接受了 [18F]FDG-PET/MRI 的重复动态检查。成像方案包括 60 分钟的 PET 列表模式采集,同时进行飞行时间 MR 血管造影扫描以分割颈动脉,并间歇性使用 MR 导航仪监测受试者的运动。AIF 作为参考标准进行采集。使用单独的低剂量 CT 扫描进行衰减校正。评估 IDIF 和 AIF 的曲线下面积之间的百分比差异,得到的数值在±5%以内。AIF(9±8)%和 IDIF(9±7)%之间也观察到类似的重复测试变异性。在所有检查和选定的脑区中,从 AIF 和 IDIF 获得的 CMRGlc 值的绝对百分比差异为 3.2%(四分位距:(2.4-4.3)%,最大值<10%)。从 AIF(14%)和 IDIF(17%)获得的 CMRGlc 值的重复测试内变异性很高。所提出的方法提供了一个 IDIF,可以有效地替代 AIF 使用。