Henriksen Alexander Cuculiza, Lonsdale Markus Nowak, Fuglø Dan, Kondziella Daniel, Nersesjan Vardan, Marner Lisbeth
Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, Denmark.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Neuroimage. 2022 Jun;253:119079. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119079. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
We aimed at evaluating a Gjedde-Patlak plot and non-invasive image-derived input functions (IDIF) from the aorta to quantify cerebral glucose metabolic rate (CMRglc) in comparison to the reference standard based on sampling the arterial input function (AIF).
Six healthy subjects received 200 MBq [F]FDG simultaneously with the initiation of a three-part dynamic PET recording consisting of a 15 min-recording of the aorta, a 40 min-recording of the brain and finally 2 min-recording of the aorta. Simultaneously, the arterial F concentration was measured via arterial cannulation. Regions of interest were drawn in the aorta and the brain and time-activity curves extracted. The IDIF was obtained by fitting a triple exponential function to the aorta time-activity curve after the initial peak including the late aorta frame, thereby interpolating the arterial blood activity concentration during the brain scan. CMRglc was calculated from Gjedde-Patlak plots using AIF and IDIF, respectively and the predictive value was examined. Results from frontal cortex, insula, hippocampus and cerebellum were compared by paired t-test and agreement between the methods was analyzed by Bland-Altman plot statistics.
There was a strong linear relationship and an excellent agreement between the methods (mean±SD of CMRglcIDIF (μmol 100 g min), mean difference, mean relative difference, 95% limits of agreement): frontal cortex: 30.8 ± 3.3, 0.5, 2.2%, [-1,6:2.5], insula: 25.4 ± 2.2, 0.4, 2.4%, [-1.4:2.2], hippocampus: 16.9 ± 1.2, 0.4, 3.8%, [-1.1:2.0] and cerebellum: 23.4 ± 1.9, 0.5, 3.1%, [-1.4:2.5]).
We found excellent agreement between CMRglc obtained with an IDIF from the aorta and the reference standard with AIF. A non-invasive three-part dynamic [F]FDG PET recording is feasible as a non-invasive alternative for reliable quantification of cerebral glucose metabolism in all scanner systems. This is useful in patients with presumed global cerebral changes owing to systemic disease or for the monitoring of treatment effects.
我们旨在评估一种Gjedde-Patlak图以及从主动脉获取的非侵入性图像衍生输入函数(IDIF),以量化脑葡萄糖代谢率(CMRglc),并与基于动脉输入函数(AIF)采样的参考标准进行比较。
6名健康受试者在开始进行三部分动态PET记录时同时接受200MBq [F]FDG,该记录包括对主动脉进行15分钟记录、对大脑进行40分钟记录以及最后对主动脉进行2分钟记录。同时,通过动脉插管测量动脉血中F的浓度。在主动脉和大脑中绘制感兴趣区域并提取时间-活度曲线。通过在初始峰值(包括晚期主动脉帧)之后对主动脉时间-活度曲线拟合三重指数函数来获得IDIF,从而在脑部扫描期间内插动脉血活度浓度。分别使用AIF和IDIF从Gjedde-Patlak图计算CMRglc,并检验其预测值。通过配对t检验比较额叶皮质、岛叶、海马体和小脑的结果,并通过Bland-Altman图统计分析两种方法之间的一致性。
两种方法之间存在很强的线性关系和极好的一致性(CMRglcIDIF的均值±标准差(μmol 100g min)、平均差异、平均相对差异、95%一致性界限):额叶皮质:30.8±3.3,0.5,2.2%,[-1.6:2.5];岛叶:25.4±2.2,0.4,2.4%,[-1.4:2.2];海马体:16.9±1.2,0.4,3.8%,[-1.1:2.0];小脑:23.4±1.9,0.5,3.1%,[-1.4:2.5])。
我们发现从主动脉获得的IDIF与AIF参考标准所获得的CMRglc之间具有极好的一致性。对于所有扫描仪系统,非侵入性的三部分动态[F]FDG PET记录作为可靠量化脑葡萄糖代谢的非侵入性替代方法是可行的。这对于因全身性疾病而可能存在全脑变化的患者或用于监测治疗效果很有用。