• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Covichem 评分预测 COVID-19 疾病的诊断效用。

Diagnostic utility of the Covichem score in predicting COVID-19 disease.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University Pendik Research and Training Hospital, 34890 Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University Pendik Research and Training Hospital, 34890 Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;60:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.07.025. Epub 2022 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2022.07.025
PMID:35905602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9287589/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identifying which patients with COVİD-19 have a high risk of severe illness is essential to optimizing management and resource utilization strategies.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to externally validate the diagnostic utility of the Covichem score for predicting COVID-19 disease severity, and secondarily to evaluate its utility in predicting intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

All consecutive COVID-19 patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) were included, and patients' demographic data, comorbidities, vital signs, oxygen requirement, and laboratory results were recorded. We calculated patients' Covichem scores and estimates (using a threshold of 0.5) and evaluated the utility of the Covichem score for predicting disease severity, ICU admission, and mortality.

RESULTS

The median Covichem score was significantly higher for patients with severe illness (Covichem score: 0.170, IQR: 0.298, n = 300 vs. Covichem score: 0.026, IQR: 0.065, n: 191; p < 0.001). Based on their Covichem scores, 12.4% (61/491) of the patients were predicted to experience severe illness (threshold: 0.5), the accuracy of the Covichem score was poor, as the area under curve (AUC) was 48.5% (18.1% sensitivity and 93.8% specificity). When we calculated a new ideal threshold, the AUC reached 82%, but the sensitivity was 79.9% and the specificity was 71.2%.

CONCLUSION

In this external validation of the Covichem score, we found that it performed worse than in the original derivation and validation study, even with the assistance of a new cutoff.

摘要

背景

识别 COVID-19 患者中哪些有发生重症的高风险对于优化管理和资源利用策略至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在外部验证 Covichem 评分预测 COVID-19 疾病严重程度的诊断效用,并评估其在预测重症监护病房(ICU)入住和院内死亡率方面的效用。

方法

所有连续因 COVID-19 就诊于急诊科(ED)的患者均被纳入研究,记录患者的人口统计学数据、合并症、生命体征、氧气需求和实验室结果。我们计算了患者的 Covichem 评分和估计值(使用阈值为 0.5),并评估了 Covichem 评分预测疾病严重程度、ICU 入住和死亡率的效用。

结果

严重疾病患者的 Covichem 评分中位数显著更高(Covichem 评分:0.170,IQR:0.298,n = 300 与 Covichem 评分:0.026,IQR:0.065,n = 191;p < 0.001)。根据他们的 Covichem 评分,有 12.4%(61/491)的患者被预测为患有严重疾病(阈值:0.5),Covichem 评分的准确性较差,曲线下面积(AUC)为 48.5%(敏感度为 18.1%,特异性为 93.8%)。当我们计算新的理想阈值时,AUC 达到 82%,但敏感度为 79.9%,特异性为 71.2%。

结论

在对 Covichem 评分的外部验证中,我们发现其表现不如原始推导和验证研究中好,即使有新的截断值的帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b033/9287589/470b86eeec4c/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b033/9287589/503e4188df7a/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b033/9287589/470b86eeec4c/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b033/9287589/503e4188df7a/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b033/9287589/470b86eeec4c/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic utility of the Covichem score in predicting COVID-19 disease.Covichem 评分预测 COVID-19 疾病的诊断效用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;60:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.07.025. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
2
Comparison of 4 Different Threshold Values of Shock Index in Predicting Mortality of COVID-19 Patients.比较4种不同休克指数阈值对新型冠状病毒肺炎患者死亡率的预测作用
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021 Dec 23;17:e99. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.374.
3
Covichem: A biochemical severity risk score of COVID-19 upon hospital admission.入院时 COVID-19 的生化严重程度风险评分:Covichem。
PLoS One. 2021 May 6;16(5):e0250956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250956. eCollection 2021.
4
Validating the RISE UP score for predicting prognosis in patients with COVID-19 in the emergency department: a retrospective study.验证 RISE UP 评分在急诊科 COVID-19 患者预后预测中的有效性:一项回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e045141. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045141.
5
Usefulness of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting the severity of COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对预测 COVID-19 患者严重程度的作用:一项回顾性队列研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2022 Jan-Feb;140(1):81-86. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0298.R1.27052021.
6
Laboratory-derived early warning score for the prediction of in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit admission, medical emergency team activation and cardiac arrest in general medical wards.实验室衍生的早期预警评分用于预测综合内科病房的住院死亡率、重症监护病房入院、医疗应急小组激活和心脏骤停。
Intern Med J. 2021 May;51(5):746-751. doi: 10.1111/imj.14613.
7
Sepsis patients in the emergency department: stratification using the Clinical Impression Score, Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction score or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score?急诊科脓毒症患者:使用临床印象评分、易感性、感染、反应和器官功能障碍评分或快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分进行分层?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):328-334. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000460.
8
Validation of oxygen saturations measured in the community by emergency medical services as a marker of clinical deterioration in patients with confirmed COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.由紧急医疗服务部门在社区中测量的氧饱和度作为确诊 COVID-19 患者临床恶化的标志物的验证:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):e067378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067378.
9
Community-acquired pneumonia severity assessment tools in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: a validation and clinical applicability study.COVID-19 住院患者社区获得性肺炎严重程度评估工具:验证和临床适用性研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Jul;27(7):1037.e1-1037.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
10
Factors Associated with ICU Admission in Patients with COVID-19: The GOL2DS Score.与 COVID-19 患者 ICU 入院相关的因素:GOL2DS 评分。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 12;57(12):1356. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121356.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling COVID-19 Secrets: Harnessing Cytokines as Powerful Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Predicting Severity.揭开新冠病毒的秘密:利用细胞因子作为诊断和预测严重程度的强大生物标志物
J Inflamm Res. 2023 Dec 11;16:6055-6070. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S439217. eCollection 2023.
2
Outcome prediction in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Comparison of the performance of five severity scores.住院COVID-19患者的预后预测:五种严重程度评分的性能比较。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 8;10:1121465. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1121465. eCollection 2023.
3
Detecting Patient Deterioration Early Using Continuous Heart rate and Respiratory rate Measurements in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Covichem: A biochemical severity risk score of COVID-19 upon hospital admission.入院时 COVID-19 的生化严重程度风险评分:Covichem。
PLoS One. 2021 May 6;16(5):e0250956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250956. eCollection 2021.
2
Identification of risk factors for in-hospital death of COVID - 19 pneumonia -- lessions from the early outbreak.鉴定 COVID-19 肺炎院内死亡的风险因素——来自早期爆发的教训。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 25;21(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05814-4.
3
Prognostic factors for severity and mortality in patients infected with COVID-19: A systematic review.
利用住院 COVID-19 患者的连续心率和呼吸率测量及早发现患者恶化。
J Med Syst. 2023 Jan 24;47(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s10916-022-01898-w.
新型冠状病毒肺炎患者严重程度和死亡的预后因素:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 17;15(11):e0241955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241955. eCollection 2020.
4
External validation of a clinical risk score to predict hospital admission and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients.对一种临床风险评分模型进行外部验证,以预测 COVID-19 患者的住院和院内死亡率。
Ann Med. 2021 Dec;53(1):78-86. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1828616. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
5
Epidemiological, comorbidity factors with severity and prognosis of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新型冠状病毒肺炎的流行病学、合并症因素与严重程度及预后:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Jul 13;12(13):12493-12503. doi: 10.18632/aging.103579.
6
CO-RADS: A Categorical CT Assessment Scheme for Patients Suspected of Having COVID-19-Definition and Evaluation.CO-RADS:一种用于疑似 COVID-19 患者的 CT 分类评估方案——定义和评估。
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E97-E104. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201473. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
7
A Tool for Early Prediction of Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Multicenter Study Using the Risk Nomogram in Wuhan and Guangdong, China.一种用于早期预测严重 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的工具:来自中国武汉和广东的多中心研究使用风险列线图。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):833-840. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa443.
8
Prediction for Progression Risk in Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia: The CALL Score.COVID-19 肺炎患者进展风险预测:CALL 评分。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 12;71(6):1393-1399. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa414.
9
Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal.COVID-19 诊断和预后预测模型:系统评价和批判性评估。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 7;369:m1328. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1328.
10
Overestimation of Albumin Measured by Bromocresol Green vs Bromocresol Purple Method: Influence of Acute-Phase Globulins.用溴甲酚绿法与溴甲酚紫法测定白蛋白时的高估现象:急性期球蛋白的影响。
Lab Med. 2018 Oct 11;49(4):355-361. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmy020.