Surkan Pamela J, Sakyi Kwame S, Hu Alice, Olinto Maria T, Gonçalves Helen, Horta Bernardo L, Gigante Denise P
Social and Behavioral Interventions Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, RS, Brasil.
Rev Saude Publica. 2018;52:61. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000161. Epub 2018 May 17.
To investigate how stressful life events and social support relate to central adiposity in Southern Brazil.
Data included information from 802 participants in the 1982 Pelotas Birth Cohort that was collect in 2004-2005 and 2006. Stratifying by sex, we studied self-reported stressful life events during the year before 2004-2005 in relation to change in waist circumference between 2004-2005 and 2006 and waist-to-hip ratio in 2006, using both bivariate and multivariate linear regression models.
In adjusted models, the experience of stressful life events during the year before 2004-2005 predicted a change in waist circumference in 2006 in men and a change in both waist-to-hip ratio in 2006 and waist circumference between 2004-2005 and 2006 in women. Men who experienced two or more stressful events had on average a one centimeter increase in their waist circumference between 2004-2005 and 2006 (β = 0.97, 95%CI 0.02-1.92), compared to those reporting no stressful events. For women, those who had one and those who had two or more stressful life events had over a 1 cm increase in their waist circumference from 2004-2005 to 2006 (β = 1.37, 95%CI 0.17-2.54; β = 1.26, 95%CI 0.11-2.40, respectively), compared to those who did not experience any stressful event. For both sexes, social support level was not significantly related to either waist-to-hip ratio or change in waist circumference, and it did not modify the association between stress and central adiposity.
The experience of more than one stressful life event was associated with distinct indicators of central adiposity for men versus women.
研究生活应激事件和社会支持与巴西南部中心性肥胖之间的关系。
数据包括1982年佩洛塔斯出生队列研究中802名参与者的信息,这些信息于2004 - 2005年及2006年收集。我们按性别分层,采用双变量和多变量线性回归模型,研究了2004 - 2005年前一年自我报告的生活应激事件与2004 - 2005年至2006年腰围变化以及2006年腰臀比之间的关系。
在调整模型中,2004 - 2005年前一年经历生活应激事件可预测男性2006年腰围的变化以及女性2006年腰臀比和2004 - 2005年至2006年腰围的变化。与未报告有应激事件的男性相比,经历两次或更多应激事件的男性在2004 - 2005年至2006年期间腰围平均增加1厘米(β = 0.97,95%CI 0.02 - 1.92)。对于女性,与未经历任何应激事件的女性相比,经历一次应激事件和经历两次或更多应激事件的女性在2004 - 2005年至2006年期间腰围增加超过1厘米(分别为β = 1.37,95%CI 0.17 - 2.54;β = 1.26,95%CI 0.11 - 2.40)。对于两性而言,社会支持水平与腰臀比或腰围变化均无显著关联且未改变应激与中心性肥胖之间的关联。
男性和女性经历不止一次生活应激事件与不同的中心性肥胖指标相关。