Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Cartilage. 2019 Oct;10(4):402-407. doi: 10.1177/1947603518777576. Epub 2018 May 23.
Delamination of the chondral surface of an osteochondral allograft (OCA) from the underlying cancellous bone has been described as a mode of failure after implantation in the knee. Our hypothesis was that increased storage time of the OCA is associated with increased risk of graft delamination after implantation.
Prospective data on 13 patients with evidence of OCA delamination identified on magnetic resonance imaging or during subsequent surgery from 2000 to 2015 were reviewed. A cohort of 33 patients without evidence of graft delamination were then matched to the delamination group based on recipient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and chondral defect location. The matched cohort size was established based on a power calculation for determining differences in OCA storage times. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up.
There was no difference in donor age, donor sex, and graft storage time between groups (30 vs. 31 days, = 0.78). There were no differences between number of previous ipsilateral knee surgeries (1.8 vs. 0.84, = 0.26), BMI (26.8 vs. 25.0 kg/m, = 0.31), total chondral defect size (6.5 vs. 5.8 cm, = 0.41) or preoperative Marx activity scores between groups.
There is no association between OCA storage time, activity level scores, or number of previous ipsilateral knee surgeries and graft delamination in our patient population. Further work is needed to identify the etiology for this mode of failure of OCAs.
异体骨软骨移植物(OCA)的软骨表面与下方松质骨分层已被描述为膝关节植入后的一种失效模式。我们的假设是,OCA 的储存时间增加与植入后移植物分层的风险增加有关。
对 2000 年至 2015 年间在磁共振成像或随后的手术中发现 OCA 分层的 13 名患者的前瞻性数据进行了回顾。然后,根据受者年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)和软骨缺损位置,将分层组与无移植物分层证据的 33 名患者进行匹配。根据确定 OCA 储存时间差异的能力计算,建立了匹配队列的大小。所有患者的随访时间均至少为 2 年。
两组之间的供体年龄、供体性别和移植物储存时间无差异(30 天与 31 天,= 0.78)。同侧膝关节手术次数(1.8 与 0.84,= 0.26)、BMI(26.8 与 25.0 kg/m,= 0.31)、总软骨缺损大小(6.5 与 5.8 cm,= 0.41)或术前 Marx 活动评分之间无差异。
在我们的患者群体中,OCA 储存时间、活动水平评分或同侧膝关节手术次数与移植物分层之间没有关联。需要进一步的工作来确定 OCAs 这种失效模式的病因。