Elsner Bernhard, Schweder Simon, Mehrholz Jan
Department of Public Health, Medical School, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
SRH Hochschule Gera, Gera, Germany.
BMC Res Notes. 2018 May 24;11(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3450-2.
This randomized controlled trial evaluates the effects of two different rest periods between as set of balance exercises after stroke during inpatient rehabilitation.
Twenty patients after stroke [11 males; mean (SD) age 65.4 (11.5) years; duration of illness 5.3 (3.4) weeks; 16 (80%) left-sided strokes] were randomly allocated into two groups of either a full rest (FR) of 4 min (n = 10) or a short rest (SR) of 1 min between exercise sets (n = 10). Patients improved from baseline until immediately after exercises in one-leg standing time on the affected leg [SR: mean difference 5.1 s (SD 10.3) and FR: 2.0 s (2.4)] and tandem standing time (TST). [SR: 14.9 s (SD 24.6) and FR: 5.7 s (12.0)], but OLST and TST did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.35 and p = 0.52, respectively). Trial registration The study was registered retrospectively in the German Register of Clinical Trials with the ID: DRKS00013979.
这项随机对照试验评估了中风后住院康复期间一组平衡练习之间两种不同休息时间的效果。
20名中风患者[11名男性;平均(标准差)年龄65.4(11.5)岁;病程5.3(3.4)周;16例(80%)为左侧中风]被随机分为两组,一组在练习组之间进行4分钟的完全休息(FR)(n = 10),另一组进行1分钟的短暂休息(SR)(n = 10)。患者从基线到练习后立即在患侧单腿站立时间上有所改善[SR:平均差异5.1秒(标准差10.3),FR:2.0秒(2.4)]以及在串联站立时间(TST)上有所改善。[SR:14.9秒(标准差24.6),FR:5.7秒(12.0)],但两组之间的单腿站立时间和串联站立时间差异无统计学意义(分别为p = 0.35和p = 0.52)。试验注册 该研究在德国临床试验注册中心进行了回顾性注册,注册号为:DRKS00013979。