Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management,Faculty of Social Sciences,University of Copenhagen,Denmark.
Department of Psychology,Faculty of Social Sciences,University of Copenhagen,Denmark.
Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;213(1):404-411. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.2. Epub 2018 May 25.
Stress-related illnesses are a major threat to public health, and there is increasing demand for validated treatments.AimsTo test the efficacy of nature-based therapy (NBT) for patients with stress-related illnesses.
Randomised controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01849718) comparing Nacadia® NBT (NNBT) with the cognitive-behavioural therapy known as Specialised Treatment for Severe Bodily Distress Syndromes (STreSS). In total, 84 participants were randomly allocated to one of the two treatments. The primary outcome measure was the mean aggregate score on the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI).
Both treatments resulted in a significant increase in the PGWBI (primary outcome) and a decrease in burnout (the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Questionnaire, secondary outcome), which were both sustained 12 months later. No significant difference in efficacy was found between NNBT and STreSS for primary outcome and secondary outcomes.
The study showed no statistical evidence of a difference between NNBT and STreSS for treating patients with stress-related illnesses.Declaration of interestNone.
与压力相关的疾病是对公众健康的主要威胁，对经过验证的治疗方法的需求日益增加。
检验基于自然的疗法（NBT）对与压力相关疾病患者的疗效。
一项随机对照试验（ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01849718），比较 Nacadia® NBT（NNBT）与称为严重躯体不适综合征专项治疗（STreSS）的认知行为疗法。共有 84 名参与者被随机分配到两种治疗方法中的一种。主要结局指标是心理综合健康指数（PGWBI）的平均综合评分。
两种治疗方法都显著提高了 PGWBI（主要结局），降低了倦怠（Shirom-Melamed 倦怠问卷，次要结局），并且在 12 个月后仍持续存在。NNBT 和 STreSS 在主要结局和次要结局方面的疗效没有显著差异。
该研究没有发现 NNBT 和 STreSS 在治疗与压力相关疾病患者方面存在统计学差异的证据。
无。
