Grootendorst Paul, Shim Minsup, Tieu Jimmy
Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2018 Apr 2;151(3):197-202. doi: 10.1177/1715163518768009. eCollection 2018 May-Jun.
Since 2010, most provincial Colleges of Pharmacists have licensed pharmacy technicians. The colleges hoped this would give pharmacists time to provide "expanded scope" activities such as medication reviews. Little is known, however, about the uptake and impact of pharmacy technicians on pharmacists' provision of such services. We address these questions using data for Ontario community pharmacies.
Data on pharmacists and pharmacy technicians were obtained from the Ontario College of Pharmacists website in September 2016. Their place of employment was used to calculate the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) pharmacists and technicians employed at each community pharmacy. Pharmacy claims data for the 12-month period ending March 31, 2016, were obtained from the Ontario Public Drug Programs (OPDP). These data included number of MedsChecks performed, type of MedsCheck and number of prescriptions dispensed to OPDP beneficiaries.
Pharmacy technicians were employed in 24% of the pharmacies in our sample. Technician employment rates were highest in Central Fill pharmacies and pharmacies serving long-term care facilities. In general, pharmacies employing 1 or fewer technician full-time equivalents (FTEs) had a slightly higher probability of providing MedsChecks and, of those that did provide Meds Checks Annuals, provided more of them. Pharmacies that hired 3 or more technician FTEs were markedly less likely to provide MedsChecks.
Pharmacies differ in their employment of technicians and in the apparent impact of technicians on the provision of MedsChecks. However, these represent associations. Additional research is needed to assess the causal effect of technician employment on the provision of MedsChecks.
自2010年以来,大多数省级药剂师学院已对药房技术员进行了资格认证。这些学院希望这能让药剂师有时间开展“扩展范围”的活动,如药物审查。然而,对于药房技术员对药剂师提供此类服务的接受情况和影响,我们知之甚少。我们利用安大略省社区药房的数据来解决这些问题。
2016年9月从安大略省药剂师学院网站获取了药剂师和药房技术员的数据。利用他们的就业地点来计算每个社区药房全职等效(FTE)药剂师和技术员的雇佣数量。截至2016年3月31日的12个月期间的药房报销数据来自安大略省公共药物计划(OPDP)。这些数据包括进行的药物检查数量、药物检查类型以及向OPDP受益人配发的处方数量。
在我们的样本中,24%的药房雇佣了药房技术员。在集中配药药房和为长期护理机构服务的药房中,技术员的就业率最高。一般来说,雇佣1名或更少全职等效技术员(FTE)的药房提供药物检查的可能性略高,而且在那些确实提供年度药物检查的药房中,提供的检查更多。雇佣3名或更多技术员FTE的药房提供药物检查的可能性明显较低。
各药房在技术员雇佣情况以及技术员对提供药物检查的明显影响方面存在差异。然而,这些只是关联关系。需要进一步研究来评估技术员雇佣对提供药物检查的因果效应。