• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对结果的合理推断。

Fair Inference on Outcomes.

作者信息

Nabi Razieh, Shpitser Ilya

机构信息

Computer Science Department, Johns Hopkins University.

出版信息

Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2018 Feb;2018:1931-1940. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

PMID:29796336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5963284/
Abstract

In this paper, we consider the problem of fair statistical inference involving outcome variables. Examples include classification and regression problems, and estimating treatment effects in randomized trials or observational data. The issue of fairness arises in such problems where some covariates or treatments are "sensitive," in the sense of having potential of creating discrimination. In this paper, we argue that the presence of discrimination can be formalized in a sensible way as the presence of an effect of a sensitive covariate on the outcome along certain causal pathways, a view which generalizes (Pearl 2009). A fair outcome model can then be learned by solving a constrained optimization problem. We discuss a number of complications that arise in classical statistical inference due to this view and provide workarounds based on recent work in causal and semi-parametric inference.

摘要

在本文中,我们考虑涉及结果变量的公平统计推断问题。示例包括分类和回归问题,以及在随机试验或观测数据中估计治疗效果。在这类问题中,如果某些协变量或治疗方法具有产生歧视的可能性,那么公平性问题就会出现。在本文中,我们认为,歧视的存在可以以一种合理的方式形式化为敏感协变量沿着某些因果路径对结果产生的影响,这一观点是对(Pearl,2009年)观点的推广。然后,可以通过解决一个约束优化问题来学习公平结果模型。我们讨论了由于这种观点在经典统计推断中出现的一些复杂情况,并根据因果和半参数推断方面的最新工作提供了解决方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c84a/5963284/d26f55b4ff7e/nihms926551f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c84a/5963284/338a5cdcf17e/nihms926551f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c84a/5963284/d26f55b4ff7e/nihms926551f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c84a/5963284/338a5cdcf17e/nihms926551f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c84a/5963284/d26f55b4ff7e/nihms926551f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Fair Inference on Outcomes.对结果的合理推断。
Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2018 Feb;2018:1931-1940. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
2
Bayesian causal inference for observational studies with missingness in covariates and outcomes.贝叶斯因果推断在协变量和结局缺失的观察性研究中的应用。
Biometrics. 2023 Dec;79(4):3624-3636. doi: 10.1111/biom.13918. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Relaxed covariate overlap and margin-based causal effect estimation.放松协变量重叠和基于边缘的因果效应估计。
Stat Med. 2018 Dec 10;37(28):4252-4265. doi: 10.1002/sim.7919. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
5
6
Learning Optimal Fair Policies.学习最优公平策略。
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2019 Jun;97:4674-4682.
7
Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.纵向观察性研究因果推断的工具变量与逆概率加权法
Stat Methods Med Res. 2004 Feb;13(1):17-48. doi: 10.1191/0962280204sm351ra.
8
Semi-Parametric Estimation and Inference for the Mean Outcome of the Single Time-Point Intervention in a Causally Connected Population.因果关联总体中单一时间点干预平均结果的半参数估计与推断
J Causal Inference. 2017 Mar;5(1). doi: 10.1515/jci-2016-0003. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
9
Principal stratification in causal inference.因果推断中的主分层
Biometrics. 2002 Mar;58(1):21-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00021.x.
10
Matching algorithms for causal inference with multiple treatments.多处理因果推断的匹配算法。
Stat Med. 2019 Jul 30;38(17):3139-3167. doi: 10.1002/sim.8147. Epub 2019 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Reporting of Fairness Metrics in Clinical Risk Prediction Models Used for Precision Health: Scoping Review.用于精准健康的临床风险预测模型中公平性指标的报告:范围综述
Online J Public Health Inform. 2025 Mar 19;17:e66598. doi: 10.2196/66598.
2
Systematic decision frameworks for the socially responsible use of precision medicine.精准医学社会责任使用的系统决策框架。
NPJ Genom Med. 2024 Oct 5;9(1):46. doi: 10.1038/s41525-024-00433-9.
3
Bias in artificial intelligence for medical imaging: fundamentals, detection, avoidance, mitigation, challenges, ethics, and prospects.

本文引用的文献

1
On Partial Identification of the Natural Indirect Effect.关于自然间接效应的部分识别
J Causal Inference. 2017 Sep;5(2). doi: 10.1515/jci-2016-0004. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
2
Quantifying an Adherence Path-Specific Effect of Antiretroviral Therapy in the Nigeria PEPFAR Program.量化尼日利亚总统紧急艾滋病救援计划中抗逆转录病毒疗法特定依从路径的效果。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2017;112(520):1443-1452. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1295862. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
3
CAUSAL INFERENCE WITH A GRAPHICAL HIERARCHY OF INTERVENTIONS.基于干预图形层次结构的因果推断
医学成像人工智能中的偏差:基础、检测、避免、缓解、挑战、伦理及前景
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2025 Mar 3;31(2):75-88. doi: 10.4274/dir.2024.242854. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
4
Estimating and Controlling for Equalized Odds via Sensitive Attribute Predictors.通过敏感属性预测器进行均衡赔率的估计与控制。
Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2023 Dec;36:37173-37192.
5
Causal fairness assessment of treatment allocation with electronic health records.基于电子健康记录的治疗分配的因果公平性评估。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Jul;155:104656. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104656. Epub 2024 May 21.
6
Quantifying Health Outcome Disparity in Invasive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection using Fairness Algorithms on Real-World Data.利用公平算法在真实世界数据上量化侵袭性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的健康结局差异。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2024;29:419-432.
7
A Review of Partial Information Decomposition in Algorithmic Fairness and Explainability.算法公平性与可解释性中的部分信息分解综述。
Entropy (Basel). 2023 May 13;25(5):795. doi: 10.3390/e25050795.
8
Use of race in clinical algorithms.种族在临床算法中的应用。
Sci Adv. 2023 May 26;9(21):eadd2704. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.add2704.
9
Counterfactual fairness: The case study of a food delivery platform's reputational-ranking algorithm.反事实公平性:一个食品配送平台声誉排名算法的案例研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 26;13:1015100. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015100. eCollection 2022.
10
Interventional Fairness with Indirect Knowledge of Unobserved Protected Attributes.具有未观察到的受保护属性的间接知识的干预公平性。
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Nov 25;23(12):1571. doi: 10.3390/e23121571.
Ann Stat. 2016 Dec;44(6):2433-2466. doi: 10.1214/15-AOS1411. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
4
Semiparametric Theory for Causal Mediation Analysis: efficiency bounds, multiple robustness, and sensitivity analysis.因果中介分析的半参数理论:效率界、多重稳健性和敏感性分析。
Ann Stat. 2012 Jun;40(3):1816-1845. doi: 10.1214/12-AOS990.
5
Counterfactual graphical models for longitudinal mediation analysis with unobserved confounding.具有未观测混杂的纵向中介分析的反事实图形模型。
Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug;37(6):1011-35. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12058. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
6
The causal mediation formula--a guide to the assessment of pathways and mechanisms.因果中介公式——评估途径和机制的指南。
Prev Sci. 2012 Aug;13(4):426-36. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0270-1.
7
Odds ratios for mediation analysis for a dichotomous outcome.二分类结局中介分析的优势比。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec 15;172(12):1339-48. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq332. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
8
Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects.直接效应和间接效应的可识别性与可交换性。
Epidemiology. 1992 Mar;3(2):143-55. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199203000-00013.